Jump to content

No Steve Tasker on NFL 100???

BillsFan692

By BillsFan692
in The Stadium Wall Archives

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

SMAKCruiser
SMAKCruiser

He's not even one of the NFLs top 1000

Gugny
Gugny

Jesus.  He really wasn't that great.  My God.

Virgil
Virgil

To me, it depends on what the list is meant for.  If it’s meant to be the top 100 players, regardless of position or fielding a team, then no he doesn’t.    If you are fielding a team, then he

Brianmoorman4jesus All Pro

Brianmoorman4jesus

Posted
Posted

I wonder how many current players are going to make this list. At first thought, I figured a few and now that I’m really thinking about it, you are really probably only looking at Brady and Viniteri. There almost definitely won’t be anyone else unless you count coaches. 

RiotAct Hall of Famer

RiotAct

Posted
Posted
  On 12/7/2019 at 2:43 AM, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

I wonder how many current players are going to make this list. At first thought, I figured a few and now that I’m really thinking about it, you are really probably only looking at Brady and Viniteri. There almost definitely won’t be anyone else unless you count coaches. 

Expand  

Rodgers?

 

Brees?

 

Van Der Esch?

BullBuchanan All Pro

BullBuchanan

Posted
Posted
  On 12/7/2019 at 2:43 AM, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

I wonder how many current players are going to make this list. At first thought, I figured a few and now that I’m really thinking about it, you are really probably only looking at Brady and Viniteri. There almost definitely won’t be anyone else unless you count coaches. 

Expand  

I'd add Brees. I think he's top 5 all time and that should get it done as a QB.

  • Like (+1) 1
Blank Stare All Pro

Blank Stare

Posted
Posted
  On 12/7/2019 at 3:09 AM, Gugny said:

Jesus.  He really wasn't that great.  My God.

Expand  

It’s silly to even include special teams players in the top 100 players of all time, but if you’re going to include them, Tasker is pretty widely thought of as the greatest special teams player of all time. As such, he should be on the list. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Gugny Hall of Famer

Gugny

Posted
Posted
  On 12/7/2019 at 3:26 AM, TheProcess said:

It’s silly to even include special teams players in the top 100 players of all time, but if you’re going to include them, Tasker is pretty widely thought of as the greatest special teams player of all time. As such, he should be on the list. 

Expand  

 

Let them make a list of Top 100 Special Team Players and he can be on that.  There's probably 1000 players better than Tasker in the history of the NFL.  He was great at what he did, but let's not pretend he was a game changer.  Come on.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
LSHMEAB Veteran

LSHMEAB

Posted
Posted
  On 12/7/2019 at 3:06 AM, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

Brees should be but my guess is he won’t be. Rogers certainly won’t be and shouldn’t be even close IMO

Expand  

Rodgers is the greatest statistical QB of all time. It could be argued that he's the BEST QB of all time. I wouldn't make that argument because rings matter, but this is just insane. He's EASILY in the top 100. Almost feel like you may be kidding.

  • Like (+1) 1
Blank Stare All Pro

Blank Stare

Posted
Posted
  On 12/7/2019 at 3:31 AM, Gugny said:

 

Let them make a list of Top 100 Special Team Players and he can be on that.  There's probably 1000 players better than Tasker in the history of the NFL.  He was great at what he did, but let's not pretend he was a game changer.  Come on.

Expand  

Oh I’m with you. It’s silly to include ST players on this list. Especially, when thinking of all the great players you have to cut from the top 100 of all time to include them. It’s a disservice to all the great players from other position groups who were left off the list that contributed more to the game (e.g., Warren Sapp, JJ Watt, some of the great QBs and receivers that will inevitably be left off). But, if they are feeling the need to squeeze in ST players, Tasker should be near the top of the list. Just my opinion though. 

row_33 Hall of Famer

row_33

Posted
Posted
  On 12/7/2019 at 3:36 AM, LSHMEAB said:

Rodgers is the greatest statistical QB of all time. It could be argued that he's the BEST QB of all time. I wouldn't make that argument because rings matter, but this is just insane. He's EASILY in the top 100. Almost feel like you may be kidding.

Expand  


still take Favre over Rodgers

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Virgil All Pro

Virgil

Posted
Posted
  On 12/7/2019 at 3:09 AM, Gugny said:

Jesus.  He really wasn't that great.  My God.

Expand  


To me, it depends on what the list is meant for.  If it’s meant to be the top 100 players, regardless of position or fielding a team, then no he doesn’t. 
 

If you are fielding a team, then he deserves to be there for Special Teams.  

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Blank Stare All Pro

Blank Stare

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 12/7/2019 at 3:39 AM, TheProcess said:

Oh I’m with you. It’s silly to include ST players on this list. Especially, when thinking of all the great players you have to cut from the top 100 of all time to include them. It’s a disservice to all the great players from other position groups who were left off the list that contributed more to the game (e.g., Warren Sapp, JJ Watt, some of the great QBs and receivers that will inevitably be left off). But, if they are feeling the need to squeeze in ST players, Tasker should be near the top of the list. Just my opinion though. 

Expand  


Side note, has an active player even been named yet? Just curious. Outside of Watt or Fitzgerald,  I’m not sure how many come close. 
 

Update: Realized I’m completely bypassing the QBs when talking about current players. Obviously Brady is in. 

Edited by TheProcess
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...