IDBillzFan Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 14 hours ago, daz28 said: Poll: Majority say Trump should be removed by Senate https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/479427-poll-majority-say-trump-should-be-removed-by-senate I'm old enough to remember that time polls told me it was Hillary in a landslide. 1 2
The Poojer Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 While i agree with the message he is conveying, the dangerous part is when he says that people are depending on congress to do things for 'us'......good lord, that's a scary way to live your life 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: 8
IDBillzFan Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I was kind of impressed the way the entire world watched Schiff spend an entire day lying....undeniably lying...with every statement. I mean, even some of the dumbest leftists could very easily prove he was lying. And yet at day's end, all the leftist media mouthpieces were talking about what a masterful job Schiff did. I read some check marks admitting they've spent their entire lives listening to prosecutors, and what they heard from Schiff yesterday was not only the best they've ever heard, it was epic and historic and will be remembered in history as a pivotal moment in American politics. The left ain't that smart, but damn they can coordinate a message in record time. Edited January 23, 2020 by IDBillzFan 4
snafu Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Senator Rand Paul Makes President Trump an Offer He Really Should Accept . Bad idea, bigly.
daz28 Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 3 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said: Over time some cities have had over 100% voter turnout, do the research, and that is BEFORE the incredibly added incentive to boost the votes by employing the total popular vote. You eliminate the electoral college the incentive to cheat goes up exponentially. Just wait til you see the voter turnout in NYC, LA, San Fran, Chicago, Detroit. They wil magically all be in the 90% if not over 100%. I'm not saying you're wrong, but this is what I found: Cities lead the nation in many ways, but not in voter turnout https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/campaign/309190-cities-lead-the-nation-in-many-ways-but-not-in-voter-turnout
RoyBatty is alive Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 1 minute ago, daz28 said: I'm not saying you're wrong, but this is what I found: Cities lead the nation in many ways, but not in voter turnout https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/campaign/309190-cities-lead-the-nation-in-many-ways-but-not-in-voter-turnout IMO cant go by one election, especially the Clinton-Trump, Democrats assumed they would win easily, the deomcratic turnout overall was weak compared to the avid Trump supporters.
snafu Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 44 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said: I was kind of impressed the way the entire world watched Schiff spend an entire day lying....undeniably lying...with every statement. I mean, even some of the dumbest leftists could very easily prove he was lying. And yet at day's end, all the leftist media mouthpieces were talking about what a masterful job Schiff did. I read some check marks admitting they've spent their entire lives listening to prosecutors, and what they heard from Schiff yesterday was not only the best they've ever heard, it was epic and historic and will be remembered in history as a pivotal moment in American politics. The left ain't that smart, but damn they can coordinate a message in record time. He's very well spoken for a deranged lunatic. 1
RochesterRob Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 Just now, snafu said: He's very well spoken for a deranged lunatic. We have all seen through our personal lives examples of people who were very well spoken but were proven to be morons when the content was analyzed. The same with people that were loud and/or forceful. Politicians are keenly aware that there is quite a swath of voters who cannot discern between eloquent speech and vapid comment. Long term the republic hangs in the balance over this. The well spoken fools will be back I'm afraid. 2
daz28 Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said: IMO cant go by one election, especially the Clinton-Trump, Democrats assumed they would win easily, the deomcratic turnout overall was weak compared to the avid Trump supporters. The article goes deeper than just 2016. Here's a quote: "Lack of voter turnout is a problem in nearly every city, not just every four years, but every year in local elections. According to an analysis from Portland State University, turnout in the nation’s largest 30 cities is a dismal 20 percent of the voting age population." I couldn't find much hard data, but most articles and data seemed to be of this general consensus
snafu Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 On 1/21/2020 at 11:47 AM, snafu said: Cue Ethel Merman: There's no business like show business and I tell you it's soTraveling through the country is so thrilling, standing out in front on opening nightsSmiling as you watch the theater filling, and there's your billing out there in lights There's no people like show people, they smile when they are lowAngels come from everywhere with lots of jack, and when you lose it, there's no attackWhere could you get money that you don't give back? Let's go on with the show Day three. 3
daz28 Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 I found this to be very interesting though, and it seems to show what little faith people have in the process itself. Look at the chart above the article: Even in the last presidential election, just 56 percent of could-be voters showed up to the polls. In fact, in hundreds of counties around the U.S., the number of eligible individuals who did not vote far outweighed the number of ballots actually cast for Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton in 2016. If those millions of no-shows had picked “nobody” on the ballot—the effective choice of their abstention—“nobody” would have won in a landslide. https://www.citylab.com/life/2018/11/voter-turnout-midterm-election-statistics-map/574939/
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 17 minutes ago, daz28 said: I'm not saying you're wrong, but this is what I found: Cities lead the nation in many ways, but not in voter turnout https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/campaign/309190-cities-lead-the-nation-in-many-ways-but-not-in-voter-turnout Different issue. This is referencing percentage of the eligible voters who register, and then vote. What’s being referenced in his argument is that in several counties the voter turnout has been larger than the population of registered voters. 1
Foxx Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 (edited) day 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcRCpUFBPac https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os_UjunQZTc Edited January 23, 2020 by Foxx 2
RoyBatty is alive Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 When is this political soap opera suppose to be over? At least Biden can continue to make gaffees on the campagin trail as some of his competition is stuck in the Senate trying to stay awake.
daz28 Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 6 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Different issue. This is referencing percentage of the eligible voters who register, and then vote. What’s being referenced in his argument is that in several counties the voter turnout has been larger than the population of registered voters. He specifically said cities, and even listed each of them. Again, the data is elusive, so I'm not going to argue something that can't be proven, but when 20% of voting age people are voting I can't see what crazy math it would take to say that 100% of registered voters voted.
Foxx Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 (edited) oh boy, Jerry Lewis Nads is first up. Edited January 23, 2020 by Foxx
3rdnlng Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, daz28 said: He specifically said cities, and even listed each of them. Again, the data is elusive, so I'm not going to argue something that can't be proven, but when 20% of voting age people are voting I can't see what crazy math it would take to say that 100% of registered voters voted. What you'll find is that certain precincts in large democratic party controlled cities have 100+% voting. Philadelphia is one and so is Los Angeles County who had an extra 1.5 million voters on their rolls. Google and take a deep dive for yourself.
Tiberius Posted January 23, 2020 Posted January 23, 2020 38 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said: IMO cant go by one election, especially the Clinton-Trump, Democrats assumed they would win easily, the deomcratic turnout overall was weak compared to the avid Trump supporters. Face it, we just out number you guys. --- In a brief tweet, Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.) explained, “Zelensky told Trump he needed military aid. Then Trump said, ‘I would like you to do us a favor, though.’ That same day, Michael Duffey sent an email directing military aid to be withheld. Now the White House is withholding Duffey’s emails. This is a cover-up.”
Recommended Posts