jrober38 Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Who forced them to call a witness from Schiff's list? Nobody forced them - it was a choice the minority made. The defense doesn't have any witnesses who actually help their case, unless they want to commit perjury. There's a reason a bunch of witnesses were blocked from testifying. Edited January 21, 2020 by jrober38 1 1
CoudyBills Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 11 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: The minority was also permitted to call fact witnesses and a couple of their witnesses did testify. It also wasn't a trial. My bad, you are correct. Not a trial. Political stunt. I mis-typed. 1
Foxx Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, jrober38 said: The defense doesn't have any witnesses who actually help their case, unless they want to commit perjury. There's a reason a bunch of witnesses were blocked from testifying. how can you possibly know this? hint: you can't. 4
dubs Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 When does this sham get started. the most hilarious part of all of this is the Dems are totally backed into a corner. Even if you assume that trump withheld funds so that the Ukraine could investigate Biden and Crowdstrike, it’s a totally defendable position given the potential corruption of Biden and the DNC!
B-Man Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 The magic, lemming-tested, word of the day ? Cover-up ! I'd suggest taking a drink after every time a democrat uses it, but I don't have enough liquor in the house.........? . 1 1
jrober38 Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Foxx said: how can you possibly know this? hint: you can't. If witnesses could exonerate the President, why on earth would he block them from testifying?
Deranged Rhino Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 10 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Who forced them to call a witness from Schiff's list? Nobody forced them - it was a choice the minority made. More dishonesty from the king of it. The minority had NO chance to call witnesses of their own choosing. None. Because Schiff is a cheat. Like you're full of Schiff. ***** off with that dishonest disinformation. 3 minutes ago, dubs said: When does this sham get started. the most hilarious part of all of this is the Dems are totally backed into a corner. Even if you assume that trump withheld funds so that the Ukraine could investigate Biden and Crowdstrike, it’s a totally defendable position given the potential corruption of Biden and the DNC! It gets started really tomorrow. Today is the rules. It'll be lawyers arguing minutia of the Senate all day. It'll be a circus, nasty, and unwatchable. 1
Foxx Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, jrober38 said: If witnesses could exonerate the President, why on earth would he block them from testifying? come on... this isn't that hard. in case you are unaware, this is following precedent and protecting future actions against the presidency. much like has happened in the past. separation of powers. Edited January 21, 2020 by Foxx 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: If witnesses could exonerate the President, why on earth would he block them from testifying? This is a garbage take. Complete garbage. We live in a system of justice where you're innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around. The house didn't prove, or come close to proving, guilt. 2 1
jrober38 Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Foxx said: come on... this isn't that hard. in case you are unaware, this is following precedent and protecting future actions against the presidency. much like has happened in the past. separation of powers. It's really sad if you actually believe this.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 Just now, jrober38 said: It's really sad if you actually believe this. It's really sad that you're pushing a complete reversal of 100s of years of liberal philosophy and jurisprudence simply because you got a BAD case of TDS. 1
Foxx Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 (edited) hey Chuck: kiss it! all you other Dems deserve it after the horseshit you put on in the House.... https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1219675037332054019 Edited January 21, 2020 by Foxx 3
Foxx Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1219675522336264197 1 1
B-Man Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 Schumer Flips Out When McConnell Drops the Trial Schedule and Rules on Him . 1 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1219675522336264197 Jordan just now says he expects no witnesses and this to be over by end of next week. 1 1 1
GG Posted January 21, 2020 Posted January 21, 2020 9 minutes ago, jrober38 said: It's really sad if you actually believe this. It's sadder that you are willing to toss the Constitution aside for your partisan beliefs. 6
Recommended Posts