Jump to content

The Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump


Nanker

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Foxx said:

come on, tibs. stop being so disingenuous. you know what Collins is saying here. that being, that what the Democrats have done here, a total partisan impeachment opens the way and sets a dangerous precedent on it happening to any future president, including a Democrat one.

Republicans are the ones being partisan by obstructing justice here. They are part of the cover up. Purely political response to obvious abuse of power. 

 

If a Democrat was trying to do this you'd be screaming your head off. 

 

Why does Trump have to lie almost constantly? Because he has to! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Republicans are the ones being partisan by obstructing justice here. They are part of the cover up. Purely political response to obvious abuse of power. 

 

If a Democrat was trying to do this you'd be screaming your head off. 

 

Why does Trump have to lie almost constantly? Because he has to! 

are we really going to have an honest discussion here?

 

if so, please tell me exactly how the Repubs are obstructing justice here as i do not know exactly to what it is you are referring to.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

are we really going to have an honest discussion here?

 

if so, please tell me exactly how the Repubs are obstructing justice here as i do not know exactly to what it is you are referring to.

 

 

God Bless You Foxx.

 

 

But you are REALLY wasting your time.

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nancy Pelosi Makes an Unintended Admission While Ranting Incoherently About Impeachment

adam-schiff-pelosi-AP-620x435.jpg

 

Amazingly, all these same people who vehemently opposed Clinton’s impeachment as “partisan” are suddenly all for this partisan impeachment. For Adam Schiff’s part, he even won his office by campaigning against an impeachment manager during Clinton’s trial.

 

While Pelosi was announcing the managers, she went on what can only be described as an incoherent rant. Here’s a clip of her attempting to make some kind of elusive point about time.  (Video at link)

 

 

Wait, what? You’d be forgiven if you thought she was drunk.

But inside of that word salad of a press conference she held, two statements caught my eye that I think summarize the Democrat viewpoint of impeachment perfectly, even though they’d love to pretend otherwise.

 

Take this one citing Putin as one of the reasons for Trump’s impeachment.

Quote

Speaker Pelosi: "This is about the Constitution of the United States and it's important for the president to know, and Putin to know, that voters in America should decide who our president is, not Putin and Russia."

 

What does Vladimir Putin have to do with an impeachment over dealings with Ukraine, a country that is currently fighting a sometimes hot, sometimes cold war with Russia?

 

I think it’s obvious. This is Pelosi admitting, whether she realizes it or not, that this is all about re-litigating  the 2016 election and handicapping the President for 2020. They see this as their chance to tarnish Trump for not doing their bidding and laying down against Hillary Clinton. The wishes of the voters are just an afterthought to these people and they’ll do whatever it takes to overcome them. To bring up Putin and Trump supposedly stealing elections, during a speech on something totally divorced from that topic, makes that abundantly clear.

 

And just to drive that point home further, Pelosi then made this assertion.

Quote

Speaker Nancy Pelosi: "He has been impeached. He's been impeached forever. They can never erase that."

 

Again, if this is just about the rule of law, why is she bragging about having impeached the President forever, as if that follows any semblance of American ideals? If he’s acquitted, then he’s not “impeached forever” anymore than someone acquitted of a crime is charged forever.

 

More at the link:

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Kemp said:

 

Parnas testifying about things he said and did would be hearsay? 

 

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you're not a lawyer.

 

Why didn't the House insist on his testimony?   It's their job. 

 

PS, why did the House introduce this evidence now and not part of their proceedings?  If you are a lawyer, what would this say about your abilities?

Edited by GG
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Doc said:


Wrong. Read the Mueller report. It details the real made up narrative.  Only idiots bought the Russian collusion farce. 

Oh stop, you didn't read the report, you are just repeating the Trump mantra like a child. 

 

 

Trump and Russia did and still are working together. And don't think this will go away, we will bring these people to justice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, GG said:

Why didn't the House insist on his testimony?   It's their job. 

 

PS, why did the House introduce this evidence now and not part of their proceedings?  If you are a lawyer, what would this say about your abilities?

if Collins is defecting, the Dems are in serious trouble.

https://twitter.com/JeremyAdler/status/1217538473969815559

 

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Oh stop, you didn't read the report, you are just repeating the Trump mantra like a child. 

 

 

Trump and Russia did and still are working together. And don't think this will go away, we will bring these people to justice

 

LOL!  Like you read it, much less understood it!

 

Let me help you: no collusion/conspiracy.  Hence no ramifications for Trump then, now or ever.

 

When you grow up and accept it, we'll stop treating you like a baby.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...