Bray Wyatt Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 21 minutes ago, Uncle Joe said: Why Jerry didn't make it today: this gif is amazing! 2 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 Just now, Foxx said: will we have a bipartisan acquital? I think so. I think there's a chance three flip: Jones (needs to vote to acquit to have any chance of winning), Manchin (same), and possibly Sinema. 3 1
Nanker Posted January 31, 2020 Author Posted January 31, 2020 9 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said: this gif is amazing! also fake. just sayin'. and sorry to say nonetheless. 2
keepthefaith Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 15 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: They will fight to the death. I hope so. That's a fitting outcome for many of them. 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I think so. I think there's a chance three flip: Jones (needs to vote to acquit to have any chance of winning), Manchin (same), and possibly Sinema. And don't forget Diane Feinstein ? 1 2
Bray Wyatt Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 4 minutes ago, Nanker said: also fake. just sayin'. and sorry to say nonetheless. next thing you are gunna tell me is wrestling is fake! 1 2
Foxx Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 (edited) i would venture that the one most disappointed with no more witnesses, would be John Bolton. his gambit to not testify in the House and time his book sales with a Senate appearance just evaporated like a long shot pony. add in that a good portion of his book appears to be headed to the classified dustbin, there goes John's dreams of being a star. Edited January 31, 2020 by Foxx 4
CoudyBills Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 8 minutes ago, Nanker said: also fake. just sayin'. and sorry to say nonetheless. Way to ruin it, jerk.
Nanker Posted January 31, 2020 Author Posted January 31, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said: next thing you are gunna tell me is wrestling is fake! It's old and was debunked years ago... sadly. It's a clever, clever clip, and was one of my favorites. 2 minutes ago, CoudyBills said: Way to ruin it, jerk. Well, all I can say is... JERK THIS! Edited January 31, 2020 by Nanker 2 4
CoudyBills Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Terrible. Complete bull####. 4
CoudyBills Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 Where you at tonight @Tiberius? I want to be sure you make 20 cents off of responding to me today.
Bob in Mich Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 35 minutes ago, Foxx said: Bob, i think you might have a serious issue. please, for your own mental health, seek help. Boy, full circle or what? Just the other day you seemed to not like me and you were calling me names. Here today you are concerned for me. That is so nice
Foxx Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 5 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Boy, full circle or what? Just the other day you seemed to not like me and you were calling me names. Here today you are concerned for me. That is so nice the other day you had you head up yer ass. not that you have extracted it yet or anything.... 1
Nanker Posted January 31, 2020 Author Posted January 31, 2020 Bob, have the decency to leave and take your diseased, decrepit mind with you. You're a poor, ruined soul that shows little hope of redemption, let alone honesty. Go buy a gun and do the right thing... for all of us. And may God have mercy on your soul. 1
Bob in Mich Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 (edited) Reposting Posted October 30, 2019 On 5/8/2019 at 2:37 PM, Bob in Mich said: Thought I would re-post this here. If we do actually get into impeachment it might be interesting to see how the backpedaling from today's Repubs follows the Dems actions from the Clinton impeachment in the 90's. Obviously the details are different but if we go down the path there will be similarities I would guess too. The other day I found a 1999 email I wrote to a friend expressing frustration with the Dems and their constant backpedaling with respect to Bill Clinton's impeachment. I recall too at that time my golf partner calling me the Raging Republican. You may think I am now a Raging Democrat but I view myself as Independent and have voted for plenty of Dems and Repubs and will likely continue that pattern. I wouldn't want anyone convicted of non-existent crimes but I also don't think we should ignore misdeeds just because of our party affiliation. I think we citizens should be more like jurors and less like the lawyers I see around here. Here is the 99 email: > I think I'm finally starting to put together some clues on this ... > > Many Clinton supporters view all of the Republicans as the Religious > Right Wing, therefor the enemy. They feel that for many years the > Religious Right has been trying to take away more and more personal > freedoms in the name of morality. They want the government to stay out of > their personal lives. That feeling is at the root of this Clinton > support. They see Ken Starr as one who has pried into the President's > personal life. They feel that the Republicans (aka Christian Coalition) > now are trying to throw him out of office because of 'immoral behavior in > his private life'. Many have decided that regardless of the facts, they > are not giving any more ground to this morality craze. > > Also, most people that liked Bill (before all of this) knew he had > told lies in the past and they accepted him anyway. Many of us that > didn't like him because of his lying felt that his backers just couldn't > see how dishonest the guy was. In reality the backers saw the dishonesty > and liked him for his other fine leadership qualities. When he is finally > caught red handed in these lies, his detractors say 'See, we told he was > dishonest. Look at the evidence we have on him.' While his supporters > say, 'What's the big deal? He told a lie about sex. The economy is > great. Get over it.' > > This is the backstepping I've seen in protecting our buddy Bill. It > seems so many points have been conceded, yet there's always another > position to fall back to ... > > 1. The story breaks... He did not have an affair with this > 'gold-digger'. She is just trying to smear the President or just out to > get a book deal for her self. The Whitehouse says that she was stalking > the President and that the FBI is investigating her. > 2. Talk of the stained dress surfaces. Now the stance is 'I > doubt he had any affair, but even if he did, so what if he committed > adultery, it's strictly a personal matter between himself, his family, and > his God. The damn Republicans probably planted this woman in there to try > to get Clinton'. > 3. He lied about sex, so what, everybody lies about sex. Who > hasn't lied about sex? Obstruction of Justice! Get real. > 4. He didn't have any obligation to do the job of the Jones' > attorneys. He wasn't forthcoming and he was evasive. He can be > misleading without committing perjury. There's nothing illegal just > because he didn't offer up answers to questions he wasn't asked. Besides > he had to protect Hillary. > 5. OK, maybe he lied, but it was a civil matter and the case > was eventually thrown out. Everybody lies in civil cases. It's not a > serious matter to commit perjury in a civil case. Besides, that Ken > Starr spent how many millions of dollars? He was appointed to investigate > Whitewater and then it became Travelgate and blah, blah, blah ... That > Betty Curry thing? He was just helping to refresh his memory, that's all. > 6. Well, he had to lie to the Grand Jury. What was he going to > do, admit to perjury in the Jones case - that would have been stupid. He > had to deny that he lied earlier or Ken Starr, that no good, rotten, > bastard .... would be able to indict him for perjury when he leaves > office. He has to maintain that he never lied now, or Starr will get him. > > 7. Look, perjury is just not that serious of a matter. It's > certainly not a 'high crime or misdemeanor like treason or bribery'. > There's no way they could make any case for Obstruction of Justice. The > obstruction case is purely speculation. He says- She says case - could > never be proven. Even if, for the purposes of argument, you suppose all > allegations are true, these are not 'high crimes or misdemeanors'. > 8. The House prosecutors show that a few Federal Judges have > been removed by the Senate for just such deeds (The Senate labeling the > perjury a 'high crime or misdemeanor'). Ok, in some cases perjury could > be grounds for removal, but not in this case. This case is only about sex > and lying about it and if that pervert Starr wasn't peeping into > everybody's bedroom... Would you want to be asked sexual questions under > oath? > 9. The Senators are not just jurors, you know. They are trying > the case. They need to consider more than just the facts, the rule of > law, and the Constitution. They also need to consider what's in the best > interests of this country. The House managers may have made a pretty good > case, but it is not in our best interests to remove the president even if > he committed perjury and obstruction of justice. > 10. And then the latest to my ears ... They had no business > asking him personal, private questions in a grand jury setting where he > couldn't plead the fifth (the protection from self incrimination). That > f***er Ken Starr. It was a witch hunt. Any evidence against Clinton has > to be discounted because of the 'illegitimate' means that were used in > acquiring it. It doesn't really matter what they found out because of the > way they went about it. Edited January 31, 2020 by Bob in Mich 1
Bob in Mich Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 2 minutes ago, Nanker said: Bob, have the decency to leave and take your diseased, decrepit mind with you. You're a poor, ruined soul that shows little hope of redemption, let alone honesty. Go buy a gun and do the right thing... for all of us. And may God have mercy on your soul. Remember that time in the cannabis thread when I apologized for implying you were an #######? That was easily the posting I regret the most. Undoubtedly you are a colossal ####### and I was as wrong as possible. 1
Recommended Posts