Jump to content

The Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump


Nanker

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

be careful what you wish for, you just might get it. you guys prove over and over that you have learned nothing.

 

 

 

24 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Nope 

You Trump bots sure hate polls. Not hard to figure out why.

 

The only things you guys like are lies. 

it's not that we hate polls, tibs. it's that we are capable of learning from history. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, westside2 said:

I'm going to play your game. Prove to everyone that you don't have multiple accounts. Prove you're innocent of that accusation. 

You are a communists. 

 

Prove you are not. 

 

Basically, you jusy thought up a dumb accusation, can't prove it at all, and you suck 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

And yet you trail after me like a lost puppy. Sad. 

 

Poor Westy 

  Just following in the tradition of Herbert Hoover's volunteerism to fix a problem.  You're a difficult problem to fix but it would be satisfying from a personal standpoint to know that we set you straight.  By the way it is very possible that Hillary was influenced by Hoover's line of thinking when she came up with her "it takes a village" philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Foxx said:

i have learned that unless a liberal discovers things for themselves, there is nothing in the world i am going to say that will ever change their mind. 

 

Well, good for you.  Your clever comeback is very clever indeed.  I mean, you even got 2 morons to like it.   Perhaps that was your goal, rather than a discussion?  Though to be fair, DR likes every comment or joke.  It's a way to garner supporters I guess.

 

Just to review though, you respond to my post with a question, I answer, you make a vague statement, I ask for clarity, you refuse to clarify your point, you give up,  and you make your clever comeback with attempted insult.   Good job!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Well, good for you.  Your clever comeback is very clever indeed.  I mean, you even got 2 morons to like it.   Perhaps that was your goal, rather than a discussion?  Though to be fair, DR likes every comment or joke.  It's a way to garner supporters I guess.

 

Just to review though, you respond to my post with a question, I answer, you make a vague statement, I ask for clarity, you refuse to clarify your point, you give up,  and you make your clever comeback with attempted insult.   Good job!

 

He asked you to think for yourself. 

 

You refused. Because you're incapable of it. 

 

That's all that happened. The fact it upsets you should cause you to question why... but you won't, because even that requires you to think for yourself. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, this book leak is now more evidence that trump did something completely within his authority as part of the anti-corruption treaty with Ukraine?

 

i still don’t know exactly what the Dems are asserting: That democrats running for office are immune from scrutiny regarding corruption and possible election interference so the president is forbidden from investigating and just is obliged to mail the check of US taxpayer funds to countries who have potentially conspired to interfere in the election with said Dems?  Do I have that right?

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dubs said:

So, this book leak is now more evidence that trump did something completely within his authority as part of the anti-corruption treaty with Ukraine?

 

i still don’t know exactly what the Dems are asserting: That democrats running for office are immune from scrutiny regarding corruption and possible election interference so the president is forbidden from investigating and just is obliged to mail the check of US taxpayer funds to countries who have potentially conspired to interfere in the election with said Dems?  Do I have that right?

 

 

 

 

Spot on. 

 

It's an attempt to accuse Trump of being guilty of exactly what they did themselves in 2016. It's an attempt to get ahead of Barr and Durham. 

 

It won't work.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...