row_33 Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 stuff like this should be for serious and proven matters a silly game of innuendo defeats the purpose and just makes the GOP steely to return the favour 10-fold 2 1
Koko78 Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) Well, at least Trump will have a unified government in 2021 now. Can finally get down to business. Edited December 5, 2019 by Koko78 8
Nanker Posted December 5, 2019 Author Posted December 5, 2019 I hope Cocaine Mitch doesn’t take it up until June of next year.
IDBillzFan Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 It's a good thing Kamala Harris has freed up her time. Well done, Dems. I didn't think you'd be stupid enough to do this...yet here we are. Thanks for everything. Sincerely, Trump/Pence 2020 Re-election Campaign 1 1
Koko78 Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 14 minutes ago, Nanker said: I hope Cocaine Mitch doesn’t take it up until June of next year. Or drag it out through the primary season. You know, by scheduling trial days to occur when the Democrats have debates planned, etc. Be a real shame if the push by all these states to have early primaries blew up in their faces. 1
Capco Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 "Never before, in the history of the republic, have we been forced to consider the conduct of a president who appears to have solicited personal, political favors from a foreign government." Is it that Trump supporters simply think the above is bogus/hot air? Or do they just not care and turn a blind eye even if they think he did do what he is being accused of, perhaps by citing other presidents who they think did the same or worse? I'd hope it's mostly the former.
Warren Zevon Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 38 minutes ago, Nanker said: I hope Cocaine Mitch doesn’t take it up until June of next year. Me too - more time for the courts go through all the appeals regarding his finances. There's a reason Trump and his minions keep screaming IMPEACHMENT BY CHRISTMAS! Trump wants it to happen ASAP
DC Tom Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 25 minutes ago, Capco said: "Never before, in the history of the republic, have we been forced to consider the conduct of a president who appears to have solicited personal, political favors from a foreign government." Is it that Trump supporters simply think the above is bogus/hot air? Or do they just not care and turn a blind eye even if they think he did do what he is being accused of, perhaps by citing other presidents who they think did the same or worse? I'd hope it's mostly the former. Trump supporters believe the latter. Sane people who are paying attention know it's the former. 1 1
Capco Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) 13 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Sane people who are paying attention know it's the former. Well now you're jumping the gun a bit yourself. Unless you think the Democrats intentionally picked insane witnesses. At Wednesday’s session, three legal experts called by Democrats said impeachment was merited. Noah Feldman, a Harvard Law School professor, said he considered it clear that the president’s conduct met the definition of “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Said Michael Gerhardt, a University of North Carolina law professor, “If what we’re talking about is not impeachable … then nothing is impeachable.” The only Republican witness, Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, dissented from the other legal experts. He said the Democrats were bringing a “slipshod impeachment” case against the president, but he didn’t excuse Trump’s behavior. “It is not wrong because President Trump is right,” Turley said. “A case for impeachment could be made, but it cannot be made on this record.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/pelosi-gives-approval-for-drafting-impeachment-articles-against-trump Idk, but I think it would be pretty difficult to get a job as a law professor at Harvard if you were insane. Just a hunch though. Edited December 5, 2019 by Capco 1
SoCal Deek Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 So now we’ll have to pass the impeachment to find out what’s in it. Nancy is on a roll here. (She’s just made herself into a laughing stock punch line for all of history to come.)
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 5 minutes ago, Capco said: Well now you're jumping the gun a bit yourself. Unless you think the Democrats intentionally picked insane witnesses. At Wednesday’s session, three legal experts called by Democrats said impeachment was merited. Noah Feldman, a Harvard Law School professor, said he considered it clear that the president’s conduct met the definition of “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Said Michael Gerhardt, a University of North Carolina law professor, “If what we’re talking about is not impeachable … then nothing is impeachable.” The only Republican witness, Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, dissented from the other legal experts. He said the Democrats were bringing a “slipshod impeachment” case against the president, but he didn’t excuse Trump’s behavior. “It is not wrong because President Trump is right,” Turley said. “A case for impeachment could be made, but it cannot be made on this record.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/pelosi-gives-approval-for-drafting-impeachment-articles-against-trump Idk, but I think it would be pretty difficult to get a job as a law professor at Harvard if you were insane. Just a hunch though. quick question for you.... do you think the insane think they're insane or sane?
Capco Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Foxx said: quick question for you.... do you think the insane think they're insane or sane? As a matter of fact I know a paranoid schizophrenic who is fully aware that he's insane. Some do know and some don't. No need to paint with such broad strokes.
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, Capco said: As a matter of fact I know a paranoid schizophrenic who is fully aware that he's insane. Some do know and some don't. No need to paint with such broad strokes. ummm.. so again... who is the one painting with a broad brush?
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 They went to “Harvard” so they’re automatically our betters, incapable of being partisan hacks. Holy Schiff what an appeal to authority. 1
Capco Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Foxx said: ummm.. so again... who is the one painting with a broad brush? The person who asked a question trying to characterize all insane people.
DC Tom Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: They went to “Harvard” so they’re automatically our betters, incapable of being partisan hacks. Holy Schiff what an appeal to authority. I'm routinely thankful I chose not to go to Harvard. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 No one who attended Harvard ever lied! They’re scholars! And our betters! 1
Recommended Posts