Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

He’s just in this topic, agreeing with the inanity of the OP and stating it’s been a point of contention. I stand by what I said.

Stand by whatever you want. You're wrong. People have absolutely been obsessed with the 300 yard number. There are countless threads arguing it.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, MJS said:

Stand by whatever you want. You're wrong. People have absolutely been obsessed with the 300 yard number. There are countless threads arguing it.

And that’s not what the OP said. Thanks for playing, Johnny tell him what he’s won.

2 minutes ago, njbuff said:

For the people who are obsessed with Allen getting a 300 yard game.....................

 

You do realize that Allen will get his 300 yard game in a loss, right?

Imagine if the Bills lost a single game. Perish the thought. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BringBackOrton said:

And that’s not what the OP said. Thanks for playing, Johnny tell him what he’s won.

You quoted Virgil and told him he was wrong about 300 yards being a point of contention. Or are you trying to revise that history as well?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, BringBackOrton said:

And that’s not what the OP said. Thanks for playing, Johnny tell him what he’s won.

So, you are apparently one of the 300 yarders??? 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, MJS said:

You quoted Virgil and told him he was wrong about 300 yards being a point of contention. Or are you trying to revise that history as well?

No one has EVER argued that you need to pass for 300 yards to have a chance to win a game. Its what the OP wrote and Virgil agreed with. It’s a bad straw man and it’s embarrassing. Go Bills.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, BringBackOrton said:

No one has EVER argued that you need to pass for 300 yards to have a chance to win a game. Its what the OP wrote and Virgil agreed with. It’s a bad straw man and it’s embarrassing. Go Bills.

Um, actually some have. And yes, it’s embarrassing. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BringBackOrton said:

No one has EVER argued that you need to pass for 300 yards to have a chance to win a game. Its what the OP wrote and Virgil agreed with. It’s a bad straw man and it’s embarrassing. Go Bills.


Actually it was said in the game day thread today. Hold on I’ll dig up the post.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

No one has EVER argued that you need to pass for 300 yards to have a chance to win a game. Its what the OP wrote and Virgil agreed with. It’s a bad straw man and it’s embarrassing. Go Bills.

 

You've been absent on a lot of posts then.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BringBackOrton said:

No one has EVER argued that you need to pass for 300 yards to have a chance to win a game. Its what the OP wrote and Virgil agreed with. It’s a bad straw man and it’s embarrassing. Go Bills.

And that's not what the OP stated either. You are reading between the lines and putting your own interpretation on what they said.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

No one has EVER argued that you need to pass for 300 yards to have a chance to win a game. Its what the OP wrote and Virgil agreed with. It’s a bad straw man and it’s embarrassing. Go Bills.


here we are:

And this is why your QB needs to be able to throw for 300+ yards. If the opposing offense is going to score at will, you'll need to respond.

 

If we get behind by double digits early, we can't go out there and do nothing drive after drive with no sense of urgency. That's what Tyrod did, and it ensured we lost those games. 

 

Posted
Just now, MJS said:

And that's not what the OP stated either. You are reading between the lines and putting your own interpretation on what they said.

 

22 minutes ago, prissythecat said:

Dam Prescott - 355 yards

 

Josh Allen - 231 yards

 

 

Dak should have won right?

What’s the interpretation besides, Dak threw for 300+ yards and therefore should have won?

 

This kind of crap really isn’t clever. It doesn’t elevate any kind of discourse. It’s the same dog ***** posting that made the BBMB a hell hole. Weird call out threads because some drunk dude was an idiot on WGR is garbage posting, and should be stopped

Just now, Wayne Cubed said:


here we are:

And this is why your QB needs to be able to throw for 300+ yards. If the opposing offense is going to score at will, you'll need to respond.

 

If we get behind by double digits early, we can't go out there and do nothing drive after drive with no sense of urgency. That's what Tyrod did, and it ensured we lost those games. 

 

Needs to be able to throw for 300 yards is not the same thing as needs to throw for 300 yards. But you knew that.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Wayne Cubed said:


here we are:

And this is why your QB needs to be able to throw for 300+ yards. If the opposing offense is going to score at will, you'll need to respond.

 

If we get behind by double digits early, we can't go out there and do nothing drive after drive with no sense of urgency. That's what Tyrod did, and it ensured we lost those games. 

 

 

LOL...Big Dingus. GO FIGURE!!! 

Posted
26 minutes ago, prissythecat said:

Dam Prescott - 355 yards

 

Josh Allen - 231 yards

 

 

Dak should have won right?


Yeah you really showed the bills fans!  
learn how to enjoy a win. 

×
×
  • Create New...