Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been giving this some thought. If you were starting from scratch with a football team, where would you begin as GM? Would you go for a quarterback first? Build the lines and go from there? Load up on skill position players and hope for the best?

 

My initial thought is that I'd prioritize positions in this order:

 

OL
K/P
QB
DL
CB
WR
TE
RB
LB
S

 

I think a team with a dominant offensive line and kicking game can get a lot done in terms of ball control and dictating the pace of games, so that's why I would make sure I have those in place before I insert a young quarterback.

 

I could be widely panned as wrong in my thinking, but I'm curious as to what philosophies we have on the board in terms of positional importance. Ultimately, it's about Ws.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

1. QB

2. LT

3. Pass rusher

4. #1 CB

5. #1 WR

6. C

 

But you always take the superior talent where possible.

 

Absolutely this.

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, T master said:

It all starts in the trenches !! On both sides of the ball !! 

This^^^. If the O line doesn’t  control the line of scrimmage the team is likely to loose. Imo, an above average D combined with a very good O is where it’s at, you have to be able to score more than your opponent, it’s that simple. At present we are barely doing this. 

 

Go Bills!!!

Edited by Don Otreply
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

QB is first by a mile and its not even close. 

LT

DE

CB

 

But its hard to create a generic list because a lot of times positional importance is based on the type of scheme or system being ran.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Everyone agrees the O-line

 

and then maybe two teams act likes it’s a priority

 

quite amusing every year

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, T master said:

It all starts in the trenches !! On both sides of the ball !! 

 

No sorry that's BS. A great QB will win you 9-10 games pretty much on his own(see Peyton Manning). There is no other single position that evens comes close to this level of importance.

 

Yes a good O and D line will help but those are numerous positions you need to fill instead of just one. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

1. QB

2. LT

3. Pass rusher

4. #1 CB

5. #1 WR

6. C

 

But you always take the superior talent where possible.

Close to my list:

1. QB

2. Pass Rusher

3. #1 CB

4. LT

5. #1 WR

 

I would also take elite talent anywhere though. You need stars to win.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, row_33 said:

Everyone agrees the O-line

 

and then maybe two teams act likes it’s a priority

 

quite amusing every year

 

 

 

Maybe its not as much a priority as people who don't know football think?

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

It’s QB and everything else. You are right in that. Nothing else is close.

I don't know. If you put Mahomes behind the worst line in football, with no skill position talent to speak of, would he really be successful?

Edited by Giuseppe Tognarelli
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Prioritizing the kicker and punter over a QB?

 

QB

OL

Secondary

WR

RB

LB

DL

TE

K

P

 

QB is always going to be the most important, but it is also the position you need to be most patient with. Don't just grab the best a available, grab one that will become great and pick up place holders until then.

 

Oline is obviously super important. Then the secondary for me. You can go very far with a good secondary. It will mask problems in other defensive position groups. Dline is not as important to me because coverage, including at the linebacker spot, trumps pressure these days.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, matter2003 said:

 

No sorry that's BS. A great QB will win you 9-10 games pretty much on his own(see Peyton Manning). There is no other single position that evens comes close to this level of importance.

 

Yes a good O and D line will help but those are numerous positions you need to fill instead of just one. 

 

Well my answer would have been different if the OP would have said position but he said positions plural so that was my reason for my reply, but to reply to you if a QB is running for his life or on his back every play no matter if you are Brady or Manning it won't matter now maybe a Favre or Rogers maybe but a pocket passer is doomed if they have no line to protect them just my humble opinion ...

Posted
Just now, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

I don't know. If you put Mahomes behind the worst line in football, with no skill position talent to speak of, would he really be successful?

Doesn't matter. You pounce on a QB that shows evidence of being great no matter where you are in the process, because you might not get another chance to get one. Then you build around him. But yes, if you don't have a good one available, you prioritize other positions and wait patiently until you find one.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

I don't know. If you put Mahomes behind the worst line in football, with no skill position talent to speak of, would he really be successful?

Yes he would win 10 games.

×
×
  • Create New...