Warren Zevon Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Shem Horne Tracy Beanz Fudge Your 3 main sources You're pathetic 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Posted November 20, 2019 Waiting on the actual indictment -- will be interesting reading. 3 1
jrober38 Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said: Yes it sounds to me like you are looking to force fit a law to fit what you believe to have taken place. A meeting does not have any value, and to think using a meeting as a tool to extort a foreign country is a joke I'm not forcing anything. There is plenty you can read online to educate yourself on the issue. The meeting isn't the issue. The issue is the investigation into a political rival. Trump extorted an ally at war with a US enemy to benefit himself politically. Laws were clearly broken, even if you don't agree with them. Edited November 20, 2019 by jrober38
Uncle Joe Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Waiting on the actual indictment -- will be interesting reading. But isn't this investigation now illegal because Trump asked for an investigation? Asking for a friend. 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: The issue is the investigation into a political rival. Trump extorted an ally at war with a US enemy to benefit himself politically. Laws were clearly broken, even if you don't agree with them. Remember you said that in two weeks... 1
dubs Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: I'm not forcing anything. There is plenty you can read online to educate yourself on the issue. The meeting isn't the issue. The issue is the investigation into a political rival. Trump extorted an ally at war with a US enemy to benefit himself politically. Laws were clearly broken, even if you don't agree with them. wrong again. investigating corruption is permissible and expected, especially when it’s someone so high up in US government as Joe Biden. 2
Bray Wyatt Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: I'm not forcing anything. There is plenty you can read online to educate yourself on the issue. The meeting isn't the issue. The issue is the investigation into a political rival. Trump extorted an ally at war with a US enemy to benefit himself politically. Laws were clearly broken, even if you don't agree with them. The only thing confirmed by Sondland in regards to a this for that was the meeting for announcement. That does not come close to extortion. The investigation aspect has to do with corruption, and was something that was brought up before Biden declared he was running, this is not new. 1
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 15 minutes ago, jrober38 said: Unable to think for myself? I'm just looking at the testimony that's been given by witnesses under oath. Trump extorted a foreign government for his political gain domestically. In doing so he broke federal campaign finance laws. All of that is obvious at this point. No, you're actually looking at the reports of the testimony. If you were looking at the testimony, you see it wasn't nearly this unambiguous. 2
GG Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Waiting on the actual indictment -- will be interesting reading. Which bottom tier Dem candidate is going to hammer Biden with this tonight? 2 1
BillsFanNC Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Uncle Joe said: But isn't this investigation now illegal because Trump asked for an investigation? Asking for a friend. Yes, Hunter Biden is retroactively entering the 2020 race, so off limits. You absolutely cannot investigate potential political opponents for their alleged past misdeeds, but you can indeed plan to "investigate" them in the future in case they win (insurance policy). 3
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, GG said: Which bottom tier Dem candidate is going to hammer Biden with this tonight? Tulsi ... if she's on stage? I forget if she is. 1
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, jrober38 said: extorted an ally at war with a US enemy Nine words, three lies. That's incredible. 6
GG Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Tulsi ... if she's on stage? I forget if she is. I was thinking her or Kamala. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: Nine words, three lies. That's incredible. It really is.
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Tulsi ... if she's on stage? I forget if she is. And she'll look good doing it. ? 2
Foxx Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, GG said: Which bottom tier Dem candidate is going to hammer Biden with this tonight? none. their polling will have shown them that it is not a good thing for a Dem. that or the DNC will have prohibited it.
Foxx Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 https://twitter.com/rameswaram/status/1197215939126689792 2 5 1
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Yes, let's ask Pompeo! Just now1m ago McFaul: Sondland's assertion that he did not connect Burisma, Biden is 'insulting to our intelligence'
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: What's this!? Money laundering? Graft? You don't say... 2
Recommended Posts