jrober38 Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: Rudy should testify!! Rudy is heading to jail just like Trump's last lawyer. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: Why would the people under oath lie about that? So, you'd admit that saying all the intel agencies cleared Biden is not a proven fact?
jrober38 Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Foxx said: to me, when someone can't recall something, pretty much across the board, not even what he testified to mere weeks ago, says that he is being disingenuous, at best. Why would anyone "remember" something that might implicate them in a crime?
Foxx Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 lol, now we know why Schifty wanted the recess. to spin to the cameras. telling, they have nothing. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Foxx said: lol, now we know why Schifty wanted the recess. to spin to the cameras. telling, they have nothing. Correct. Have to set the hook.
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Foxx said: lol, now we know why Schifty wanted the recess. to spin to the cameras. telling, they have nothing. ya ya 1
dubs Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 4 minutes ago, jrober38 said: It comes straight from the testimony given by people over the past 3 days. They all said the Biden conspiracy was total garbage. the other things, since when is US foreign intelligence responsible for investigating domestic crimes? Wouldn’t the more appropriate approach be to get the attorney general or a special council involved, not people with no authority to investigate and prosecute domestic crimes? 1
Westside Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: ya ya Gartibbob? 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 16 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Horseshit. Simple question. The reason no one answers I presume is the desire to not be on the record saying it was wrong or impeachable. If you won't say his actions, if proven, were wrong, there is no sense conversing with you. EARMUFFS! I find your language offensive, or would if I did not swear like a longshoreperson myself. But a reminder that Tibsy, Busey and jrobers may all have a snow day today. Let’s put impeachable to the side for a moment, there seems to be ample evidence an objective person would be able to look at the political landscape right now and acknowledge there is no consensus there. As for “wrong”, are you asking if the overly simplistic fact pattern you outlined is morally wrong, wrong from a legal perspective and are you speaking in political terms? For instance, I thought it wrong that Trump inserted himself into the NFL controversy with players kneeling. I did not think it an impeachable offense. I also thought it wrong of Trump to make comments about John McCain as a POW, but given the political nature of the dispute between the two, McCains own pettiness and the fact that he was just another fat cat politician engorging himself at public trough, context was important to me. I would agree that if Trump was a Russian spy, working in the interests of the Russians, to destroy our country as suggested by many of your people, that would constitute an impeachable offense and I would consider it “wrong”. 4
jrober38 Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, Foxx said: lol, now we know why Schifty wanted the recess. to spin to the cameras. telling, they have nothing. They have nothing? They a first hand witness saying the President, Vice President and Secretary of State were all part of a conspiracy to get a foreign government to do a quid pro quo, digging up dirt on a political opponent in exchange for a meeting and money that had already been allocated to them by congress. 2
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: LOL, so dishonest
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: They have nothing? They a first hand witness saying the President, Vice President and Secretary of State were all part of a conspiracy to get a foreign government to do a quid pro quo, digging up dirt on a political opponent in exchange for a meeting and money that had already been allocated to them by congress. He admitted he's not a first hand witness to anything of the sort
Foxx Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: you know it as well as most here if they are honest with themselves. if they had anything, they would not have to continually to to spin testimony. the testimony would speak for itself. when has a chairman ever come out in the middle of a hearing to tell the public what a witness just said?
jrober38 Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Foxx said: you know it as well as most here if they are honest with themselves. if they had anything, they would not have to continually to to spin testimony. the testimony would speak for itself. when has a chairman ever come out in the middle of a hearing to tell the public what a witness just said? When has the chairmen been part of a hearing where someone says the President committed a crime?
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Foxx said: you know it as well as most here if they are honest with themselves. if they had anything, they would not have to continually to to spin testimony. the testimony would speak for itself. when has a chairman ever come out in the middle of a hearing to tell the public what a witness just said? What color is the sky in your world?
Recommended Posts