Bob in Mich Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, RochesterRob said: Taste defeat, troll! Did you do a bit part for Monty Python as the 'black knight' guarding a bridge. You were hilarious then too. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Posted November 20, 2019 As we know, Corn is the most exposed of all the journos. He has a BIG stake in this and will continue to push lies (as he's done for three years) to save his own ass. It won't work. 3
Bob in Mich Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: The Ukrainians were asked to look into the 2016 election interference the previous administration participated in - you know, the same election the Democrats examined Trump's undies over. Why was that ok to investigate the Trump campaign, yet it is not ok to investigate 2016 election interference by the Ukraine and the Democrats? And as a bonus question - why is ok for Joe Biden to secure graft through his son Hunter? Consider if that were Trump/Trump Jr. Would you think that was wrong? Happy to get into that after you please answer my question. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I know many won't want to see it, but trying to leverage the Ukraine aid for his own personal political benefit was attempted and was wrong. Suspend for a moment what has or will be proven. Just answer a simple question, please. If Trump's intent and actions were exactly as I just stated in the paragraph above, would you think that either wrong or impeachable? Edited November 20, 2019 by Bob in Mich
TH3 Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: As we know, Corn is the most exposed of all the journos. He has a BIG stake in this and will continue to push lies (as he's done for three years) to save his own ass. It won't work. Putting your life jacket on? 2
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Happy to get into that after you please answer my question. Suspend for a moment what has or will be proven. Just answer a simple question, please. If Trump's intent and actions were exactly as I just stated in the paragraph above, would you think that either wrong or impeachable? I never wrote what you have in quotes from me. Did you mean to misrepresent what I wrote? Or what it an accident? (the second part) Edited November 20, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 1
Warren Zevon Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, TH3 said: Putting your life jacket on? Can bots swim?
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: I never wrote what you have in quotes from me. Did you mean to misrepresent what I wrote? Or what it an accident? It looks like an honest error on his part. Stupid mistake, but honest. Someone tell me again pot is harmless. 1
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Gary Busey said: Can bots swim? They don't need to. They just walk underwater. Source: Dr. Roy Hinckley and Mr William Gilligan. 1
Bob in Mich Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: I never wrote what you have in quotes from me. Did you mean to misrepresent what I wrote? Or what it an accident? Sorry, not really sure how that happened. I was trying to quote myself in order to include enough of my prior post so that the question still made sense. That second quoted part was mine. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Posted November 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, TH3 said: Putting your life jacket on? You have no idea what's about to happen... which makes this funnier. The "bribe' has moved from being attached to the aid money, to a white house visit. But if you've been paying attention, the white house visit angle has already been shredded in previous testimony. What's about to happen to Sondland won't be pretty. 5
B-Man Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 HMM: ‘Bro-like’: Schiff aide was White House friend of alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella. Alleged Ukraine whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was close friends at the White House with an official who is now a key aide to Adam Schiff, the House Intelligence Committee chairman leading the Democratic push to impeach President Trump. WHOLE LOTTA NOTHIN’: Ken Starr: Witnesses Haven’t Accused Trump of Breaking the Law: ‘The idea it’s an impeachable offense is to me quite extreme, it’s extravagant.’ HEH: “This tweet is such a perfect example of cocooned liberal self-love.” .
Warren Zevon Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: You have no idea what's about to happen... which makes this funnier. The "bribe' has moved from being attached to the aid money, to a white house visit. But if you've been paying attention, the white house visit angle has already been shredded in previous testimony. What's about to happen to Sondland won't be pretty.
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: You have no idea what's about to happen... which makes this funnier. The "bribe' has moved from being attached to the aid money, to a white house visit. But if you've been paying attention, the white house visit angle has already been shredded in previous testimony. What's about to happen to Sondland won't be pretty. I cannot believe the Democrats have not called it a day on this. The released polls (I know, I know) show independents up 10% in the Are you ***** kidding me? category in just three days. It isn't going to get better. Is Nancy letting this run so it never comes up again? Schiffy over-promised and under-delivered (again). Is this to shut up up? And they must know if it moved to the Senate things only get worse for them. Are the votes not there to bring impeachment proceedings? 3
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Would anyone be surprised if a Russian hit took place? Trump supporters would just laugh it off, "Obama and Hillary did worse" "The Army is providing supportive assistance to help Lt. Col. Vindman with the public attention," Col. Kathy Turner, an Army spokeswoman, said in a written statement. "As a matter of practice, the Army would neither confirm nor deny any safety or security measures taken on behalf of an individual; however, as we would with any Soldier, the Army will work with civilian authorities to ensure that he and his family are properly protected," she added. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/army-providing-security-assistance-vindman-key-witness-impeachment/story?id=67137282 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I cannot believe the Democrats have not called it a day on this. The released polls (I know, I know) show independents up 10% in the Are you ***** kidding me? category in just three days. It isn't going to get better. Is Nancy letting this run so it never comes up again? Schiffy over-promised and under-delivered (again). Is this to shut up up? And they must know if it moved to the Senate things only get worse for them. Are the votes not there to bring impeachment proceedings? They have no choice but to keep going. They are boxed in by the crazies in their own party, and by their media counterparts who are BEGGING them to provide something substantive -- unlike they did with Trump/Russia. FISA is looming. They know it. This is their last attempt at a hail mary. 2 2
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Ooooh (make sense yet?) Oh, of course he is. I know it is a pretty tight circle on this, but shesh you'd think there were only three attorneys in all of DC the way the same people keep popping up again, and again for the deep staters. 1
Recommended Posts