Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 20 minutes ago, jrober38 said: Pretty sad that these guys were two witnesses the Republicans wanted. Neither did anything to help their cause. Sondland is going to be devastating. That was a real disaster. Morrison was just so funny dancing around why he went to the lawyers. SNL will eat that up
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: SNL will eat that up Certainly sounds like a successful impeachment. I pity you. 3
SoCal Deek Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: That was a real disaster. Morrison was just so funny dancing around why he went to the lawyers. SNL will eat that up See if you can follow along....he said he went to the lawyers because they were always on these calls but in this case were not for whatever reason so he gave them a debrief. Once again Tibs...please attend your local school board meeting and you’ll find that the board has a lawyer sitting right there on the dais! It doesn’t mean your school board are all crooks.
Koko78 Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, Doc said: Is Zelensky still saying there was no pressure? Was an investigation started? Was the money released after conditions were met? If the answer to all 3 is still "no," there's no case here. They're trying to get around the 'no pressure' comment by pretending that Trump's power was so drastically superior to Zelensky, that any simple request made to Ukraine is a mandate that cannot be refused, no matter what. Of course that ruins their quid pro quo argument, but that's old news. We're on to bribery (with no actual bribes in sight) because the term tests well with focus groups! The Democrats are hilariously scraping the bottom of the barrel. 1 hour ago, Rob's House said: 6
Doc Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 18 minutes ago, Koko78 said: They're trying to get around the 'no pressure' comment by pretending that Trump's power was so drastically superior to Zelensky, that any simple request made to Ukraine is a mandate that cannot be refused, no matter what. Of course that ruins their quid pro quo argument, but that's old news. We're on to bribery (with no actual bribes in sight) because the term tests well with focus groups! The Democrats are hilariously scraping the bottom of the barrel. I'm open to the idea that Zelensky could be lying when he says there no pressure because he needs that aid to prevent all those soldiers from dying (even though they never realized it was held-up). But the fact that there was no investigation backs that up. And the money was released. I mean, you pressure/bribe someone to do something and they don't do it...it's obviously bribery! As for calling it bribery, I thought it was a good point that at no time during the investigations was the word "bribery" used, except by Pelosi recently because of the focus groups, and then her drones afterwards. 1
njbuff Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 So what’s the next impeachable offense gonna be when this utter garbage falls thru? What???? The President uses 2 ply TP, while his staff uses one ply. IMPEACH THE MF’er. ?? 2
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, njbuff said: So what’s the next impeachable offense gonna be when this utter garbage falls thru? What???? The President uses 2 ply TP, while his staff uses one ply. IMPEACH THE MF’er. ?? "Trump lied when he tweeted about his impeachment hearings."
njbuff Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: "Trump lied when he tweeted about his impeachment hearings." #mustimpeachorangemanbad
njbuff Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 The only thing that these bogus hearings was missing is that dumb Indian who was banging his drum in that kids face.
transplantbillsfan Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) Just checking in if this place is still nuts for Trump. Yep. Yep you are. I'd be sad about it if it weren't so pathetic. Pretty clear Republicans are just desperately moving goalposts and attacking the credibility of highly credible witnesses rather than giving 2 ishes about the Country. Wasn't Volker the guy who was supposed to flip Democratic arguments on their heads? Afternoon witnesses were supposed to be Republican counter arguments, instead, they amend their previous closed door depositions in real time. Good GAWD people... are you watching??? Are you just lying to yourself that what you're seeing DOESN'T make Trump look horribly corrupt???? Regardless of what the spineless McConnell manipulates his Senate to do in order to not impeach Trump, the country is going to be so damn frustrated such overt and blatant corruption was overlooked, they'll just vote the idiot out of office in less than a year. And McConnell better be careful because that frustration might very well spill over into his own branch and the entire legislative and executive branch could turn blue. Maybe he should view his own state's most recent Republican embarrassment in the Governor's race as a warning. Edited November 20, 2019 by transplantbillsfan 4
KD in CA Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 11 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Good GAWD people... are you watching??? Is anyone watching? Except maybe the same idiots who have breathlessly clung to every other bogus story since the day he was elected. You can only cry wolf so many times before people stop listening to you. 1
transplantbillsfan Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 43 minutes ago, KD in CA said: Is anyone watching? Except maybe the same idiots who have breathlessly clung to every other bogus story since the day he was elected. You can only cry wolf so many times before people stop listening to you. Keep being misinformed by your alternative news with their alternative facts.
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 4 hours ago, KD in CA said: Is anyone watching? Except maybe the same idiots who have breathlessly clung to every other bogus story since the day he was elected. You can only cry wolf so many times before people stop listening to you. Yeah, I've been watching... well most of it. It is a buncha butt-hurt state officials whining and complaining that the foreign policy changed. *GASP!!!* And, what was worse, they never met the President, have no first hand knowledge of the phone call (except for the leaker Vindman and that lady Williams), apparently cannot read a transcript (which was testified to as accurate by Vindman and Williams), and are basically there to cry that they were not consulted on foreign policy change. Then to top it all off? The foreign policy change is working. The horror!! Only someone disconnected from reality could possibly think there is anything impeachable about this call. The quid-pro-quo talking point is long gone. Now they are on to "bribery". Only problem for the Democrats is the only one mentioned in those 3500 pages of released depositions mentioned in connection to the word Bribery is Biden. Oopsie. 2 3
BillsFanNC Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said: Just checking in if this place is still nuts for Trump. Yep. Yep you are. I'd be sad about it if it weren't so pathetic. This seems to be your constant qualifier every time that you reappear down here. Serious question: why do you keep reappearing down here? Clearly the majority of posters here dont buy to any great extent what the MSM is selling. Do you expect that to change ever? Do you expect a single "Trump supporter" here to suddenly have an epiphany and start reading the Washington Post and/or tune into CNN/MSNBC and start buying into any of it? There is as much chance of that happening as there is of you actually reading any of the primary source documents that you've been directed to numerous times. It just isnt happening. I only ask because unlike many of the other posters from the "other side" down here you actually put some time and thought into your posts and dont seem to be here simply to troll. Seriously, why bother? Edited November 20, 2019 by BillsFanNC 2 2
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 9 hours ago, DC Tom said: Certainly sounds like a successful impeachment. I pity you. I’d say it went pretty well.
thebug Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Yeah, I've been watching... well most of it. It is a buncha butt-hurt state officials whining and complaining that the foreign policy changed. *GASP!!!* And, what was worse, they never met the President, have no first hand knowledge of the phone call (except for the leaker Vindman and that lady Williams), apparently cannot read a transcript (which was testified to as accurate by Vindman and Williams), and are basically there to cry that they were not consulted on foreign policy change. Then to top it all off? The foreign policy change is working. The horror!! Only someone disconnected from reality could possibly think there is anything impeachable about this call. The quid-pro-quo talking point is long gone. Now they are on to "bribery". Only problem for the Democrats is the only one mentioned in those 3500 pages of released depositions mentioned in connection to the word Bribery is Biden. Oopsie. Sounds like someone was listening to the talking heads! ???
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: This seems to be your constant qualifier every time that you reappear down here. Serious question: why do you keep reappearing down here? Clearly the majority of posters here dont buy to any great extent what the MSM is selling. Do you expect that to change ever? Do you expect a single "Trump supporter" here to suddenly have an epiphany and start reading the Washington Post and/or tune into CNN/MSNBC and start buying into any of it? There is as much chance of that happening as there is of you actually reading any of the primary source documents that you've been directed to numerous times. It just isnt happening. I only ask because unlike many of the other posters from the "other side" down here you actually put some time and thought into your posts and dont seem to be here simply to troll. Seriously, why bother? Why did you bother to write this post? Serious, you seem interested in others motives, what's yours?
Foxx Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 25 minutes ago, Tiberius said: to punk Soro's cubicle farm workers?
SoCal Deek Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Let me simplify this for everyone: A bunch of long time employees didn’t like the fact that the Board of Directors hired a new boss to come in and shake up the way things were being done at the company so they started spreading gossip and rumors about him. But, when those employees were marched into the HR Department not a single one could point to a single thing the boss had actually done wrong. In fact most had never even spoken to the boss. They just sort of don’t like his management style. The End. Zzzzzzz 2 1 2
Recommended Posts