row_33 Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 how much more time to hear that Ukraine promised to be good boys from now on, and the diplomats' collective hearts were vexed at Trump's failure to cave in immediately....
Chef Jim Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 11 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Right because if not for him Trump would still be withholding aid and the sale of arms? Sure thing. And cheating on his tax return. Don't forget that.
row_33 Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 Just now, Chef Jim said: And cheating on his tax return. Don't forget that. and being a dupe for the Commies
njbuff Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 I hope they hold Schiff for brains accountable after this utter farce is done. 1
Koko78 Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, njbuff said: I hope they hold Schiff for brains accountable after this utter farce is done. Nah, he'll get re-elected in a landslide. The morons on the left think they're winning.
Tiberius Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 Gym, Gym, the Whistleblower came forward in that time, Gym, why you forgetting that?
GG Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Surprised nobody brought up the tidbit that Goldman tried to goad Volker with a blatant lie. Can you imagine if the roles were reversed? This is pretty shady stuff, unless Gary is the committee counsel. Quote Mr. Goldman told Mr. Volker that the envoy had previously testified that investigations sought by President Trump appeared "designed to serve the president's political interests not the national interests." He asks Mr. Volker: "What did you mean when you said that?" Mr. Volker responded: "I don't recall that language from my testimony. Is that my October 3rd testimony? "Yes, it was," Mr. Goldman replied. A review of the transcript shows the phrase "political interests" appears three times in the Oct. 3 Volker testimony. But the phrases were spoken by Maher Bitar, the general counsel for the Intelligence Committee, not Mr. Volker, according to the transcript, as well as in a question by senior counsel Daniel Noble. ... 1 1
Pilsner Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Swallwell is killing it Who is he gassing this time? 2
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 4 minutes ago, Pilsner said: Who is he gassing this time? Sadly, impeachment hearings are more interesting than the Sabres game 1
Doc Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 23 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Swallwell is killing it He''s neither silent nor deadly. Unlike his farts. 1
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Volker just didn't know! Morrison reported it for no reason Morrison just went for no reason! 1
Albwan Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 52 minutes ago, Pilsner said: Who is he gassing this time? Only tibs could think 0% Swallwell is killing something lol. So so at gaslighting, sure. 1
jrober38 Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 29 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Volker just didn't know! Morrison reported it for no reason Morrison just went for no reason! Pretty sad that these guys were two witnesses the Republicans wanted. Neither did anything to help their cause. Sondland is going to be devastating. 2
Doc Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Is Zelensky still saying there was no pressure? Was an investigation started? Was the money released after conditions were met? If the answer to all 3 is still "no," there's no case here. 1
Recommended Posts