3rdnlng Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 So, the two witnesses today and the only two so far that listened in on the call have stated that the transcript of the call on 7-25 is essentially correct. These are "prosecution" witnesses. The purpose of the continuation of this hearing is what? 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: So, the two witnesses today and the only two so far that listened in on the call have stated that the transcript of the call on 7-25 is essentially correct. These are "prosecution" witnesses. The purpose of the continuation of this hearing is what? For the high drama? / sarc To bore us all to death? To waste cable news time? 1
row_33 Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 congratulations America! although your Constitution was explicitly designed to prevent a UK/Canada-style Parliamentary vote of non-confidence (just because it's the other party in charge) you are marching gleefully into this kind of a government 2
Deranged Rhino Posted November 19, 2019 Author Posted November 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, Albwan said: The most telling thing about today is the awkward exchange regarding the whistleblower. Clearly they are going to hide this clown, for good reason. Which, again, I have to point out. Anyone saying exposing the Whistleblower's name endangers his personal safety is either lying to your fact (Schiff) or ignorant of reality (GarBoTibs). Going public is the BEST way to assure the WB's safety. Ask Snowden.
keepthefaith Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: So, the two witnesses today and the only two so far that listened in on the call have stated that the transcript of the call on 7-25 is essentially correct. These are "prosecution" witnesses. The purpose of the continuation of this hearing is what? To save the Republic from Trump. We're in a racist, corrupt constitution crisis. Say it with me, constitutional crisis! Oh and our national security is at risk because, Ukraine. 1
row_33 Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 i'd hate to suffer as a WB when i didn't have any evidence to begin with kind of like being outed and getting bashed into a pulp when you weren't in in the first place 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 Trying to bring Rudy into " our tent". These people... 1
Albwan Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 18 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: This is important -- and what the nutters won't cop to: Like they wouldn't cop to in the Russia debacle. "IT'S TRUE BECAUSE THE MEDIA SAID SO!" Is a stupid way to approach this (dis)information war, yet it's what this entire thing is built upon. (Clip) *********************** And its ok because I guarantee Swallwell enjoys smelling his own farts. 1
3rdnlng Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Yes, for 5 million a year with 95% of it being paid by Burisma. All aboveboard. 1
thenorthremembers Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 At what point do the Dems end the interviews and just try to get Trump to agree to tie a stone to his chest to see if he floats? 1
Tiberius Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Yes, for 5 million a year with 95% of it being paid by Burisma. All aboveboard. Which he reported to his chain of command. Stop smearing this serviceman, he isn't Flynn or like him
row_33 Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 On 11/13/2019 at 11:02 AM, Deranged Rhino said: Bob, all you do is lose. Take another L, smoke another joint, and pretend you understand what's happening. I'm pretty sure if someone asked your opinion on what day it is, you'd get that wrong. all of that lifestyle would try to think of a clever and more-hip-than-you answer for 15 seconds when asked the day of the week and probably lie during the answer 1
Tiberius Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: At what point do the Dems end the interviews and just try to get Trump to agree to tie a stone to his chest to see if he floats? Come on, you don't think it's a serious issue that Trump was spewing Russian propaganda that Ukraine interfered in 2016 election? We know it was Russia
Bakin Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 39 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Who will prosecute Vindman? The military? This guy? 1
Recommended Posts