Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

 

What If They Gave an Impeachment and Nobody Came?

by Kurt Schlichter

 

Original Article

 

So, while that human troll doll of an ambassador was back east dancing for Adam Schiff’s pleasure and I was out in a glitzy blue Los Angeles-area city at a nice restaurant to score some munchables and people were talking and chatting and interacting and how many were talking about impeachment?

 

.Here’s a hint: It’s the same number as the average dates per decade for a Weekly Standard writer. Just kidding – there is no such thing as a writer for the Weekly Standard because it destroyed itself by sucking. The number is “Zero.”

 

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

What If They Gave an Impeachment and Nobody Came?

by Kurt Schlichter

 

Original Article

 

So, while that human troll doll of an ambassador was back east dancing for Adam Schiff’s pleasure and I was out in a glitzy blue Los Angeles-area city at a nice restaurant to score some munchables and people were talking and chatting and interacting and how many were talking about impeachment?

 

.Here’s a hint: It’s the same number as the average dates per decade for a Weekly Standard writer. Just kidding – there is no such thing as a writer for the Weekly Standard because it destroyed itself by sucking. The number is “Zero.”

 

 

 

.

 

One of the more eye opening aspects of the Trump presidency that Schlichter touches on, is how many so-called conservative commentators have been exposed as grifters.

 

I'd had some reservations about the Weekly Standard crowd in the few years leading up to 2016, but I had no idea their convictions only ran as deep as their revenue stream. Now the establishment conservatives (Conservative Inc., as they're being called by many) seem more interested in ousting the outsider than accomplishing any of their stated goals.

 

Now Conservative Inc. is trying to cancel Michelle Malkin, SJW style, for refusing to disavow a group of young conservatives who have apparently engaged in wrong think. - I don't know the full story here, but it sounds like young guys who are tired of being shamed for being white and have pushed back against that movement, not always in politically correct terms, and are thus called white supremacists and Holocaust deniers.

 

The Trump Presidency, and the witch hunts it has inspired, continues to expose the dirty, corrupt scum that have taken over DC and the DC media.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Albwan said:

Guy to the far left looks like he's thinking to himself 'Geez I wonder if anyone is buying any of this bull^&%$'

sfvEvQn.gif

 

Not sure if this had been posted but its hilarious:

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Contempt for the voters on display in Congress

 

Impeachment by Focus Group

by David Catron

 

Original Article

 

Anyone following the increasingly desperate Democratic impeachment effort will by now be aware that they have exchanged the term “quid pro quo” for “bribery” and “extortion.”

 

They rebranded President Trump’s alleged offenses, according to a Washington Post report, after the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee conducted a number of focus groups to test their messaging.

 

 

 

They had to. No one in the #Resistance speaks Latin. Few Leftists graduated from High School.

Posted

Trumps saying he might testify in writing to the impeachment proceeding. 

 

 

Oh sure, "I don't recall" to every question would have to do, huh? 

 

Hes too too stupid to answer questions in

person. He'd start lying almost immediately 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

When did I get to vote for Vindman or any of these government cubicle workers? Oh that’s right ....I didn’t get to vote for them. We’re gonna need a bigger FIRE HOSE to flush out the swamp. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
33 minutes ago, Foxx said:



Vindman was a suspected leaker for a while before the Ukraine calls,  denied access to meetings, not allowed on "sensitive" trips and then suddenly allowed on a call when Ukraine needed to be brought to greater scrutiny.   Sure. No one knew what Vindman was up to. He was a super duper #resistance sleuth. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Paul Sperry and his "breaking". Guy needs a new shtick.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:



Vindman was a suspected leaker for a while before the Ukraine calls,  denied access to meetings, not allowed on "sensitive" trips and then suddenly allowed on a call when Ukraine needed to be brought to greater scrutiny.   Sure. No one knew what Vindman was up to. He was a super duper #resistance sleuth. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Paul Sperry and his "breaking". Guy needs a new shtick.

 

And now that everyone can read the transcript of the phone call....zzzzzz.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:



Vindman was a suspected leaker for a while before the Ukraine calls,  denied access to meetings, not allowed on "sensitive" trips and then suddenly allowed on a call when Ukraine needed to be brought to greater scrutiny.   Sure. No one knew what Vindman was up to. He was a super duper #resistance sleuth. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Paul Sperry and his "breaking". Guy needs a new shtick.

 

:beer: 

 

Or they did know what was up, and as I suggested the other day, this was a leak trap. 


Trump gets Vindman. 

Sondland gets the riff raff on the ground in Ukraine. 

 

 

To that point: 

 

 

And this: 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 4
Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:beer: 

 

Or they did know what was up, and as I suggested the other day, this was a leak trap. 


Trump gets Vindman. 

Sondland gets the riff raff on the ground in Ukraine. 

 

 

To that point: 

 


Whaaaaaatttttt!!!??? You mean that Orange-idiot had a PLAN!!!??? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! :doh:

People keep underestimating President Trump calling him a buffoon, stupid, etc. Man really is playing chess while his political opponents are playing checkers.

 

  • Like (+1) 5
×
×
  • Create New...