Tiberius Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, westside2 said: Coming from someone who laughed at the Americans who died in Benghazi, I find your outrage over Acosta full of schiff. Spare me your moral outrage, since you've never shown to have any morals before. But don't you think it was a horrible act to place that guy in his cabinet? What at a clear message, you help getting criminals out from the justice they deserve, and Trump will reward you.
3rdnlng Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...how exactly would you define MAGA?.....is "make America great again" a fallacious ruse?.....did he seek the presidency for power, substanial salary, wealth, a book deal, his own library and free transportation on Air Force One and Marine One?....how many times has the fickle electorate yearned for a "Washington outsider" to clean up the stench?.....and how many times have "Washington insiders" run fraudulently as "outsiders" to no avail?....so we finally get a real "Washington outsider" who is crass, abrupt, condescending, abrasive, abusive, irascible, etc and is doing exactly what the establishment "good 'ol boyz network" needed?.....isn't it upside down on its ugly head?....haven't we found out so far that the "world's greatest democracy" has been exposed to unparalleled graft, corruption, misuse, abuse, subversive underhanded political partisanship, etc?....the same squeaky clean democracy we've tried to force feed on nations ripe with political corruption?...kinda like the "pot calling the kettle black"?.....so now we have the progressives continually on the attack to tear down this repugnant, imperialist nation, making us the world's apologists, destroying capitalism in favor of socialism to dilute the concentration of power with handouts to the "gimme crowd" so deserving.....where exactly do you stand on these issues, for or against?...just curious............ You are wasting your time with that idiot. He can't even distort my words in a quote in a humorous way. 1
Tiberius Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 20 minutes ago, Rob's House said: Can we also agree that the Trump is Hitler cult doesn't give half a sh!t whether the President squeezed Ukraine for info on Biden, and that all the impeachment nonsense is political theater? But we do care because he is trying to steal the next election. That's why we care so much. We we want him gone one way or another (legally) hey, it's not like he is being impeached over a #### ### 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: You are wasting your time with that idiot. He can't even distort my words in a quote in a humorous way. Your words are usually funny in a pathetic way to begin with
3rdnlng Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: But we do care because he is trying to steal the next election. That's why we care so much. We we want him gone one way or another (legally) hey, it's not like he is being impeached over a #### ### Your words are usually funny in a pathetic way to begin with I wasn't referring to you in my post. No need to do so, everyone here knows what an idiot you are.
Deranged Rhino Posted November 16, 2019 Author Posted November 16, 2019 1 hour ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Having watched and listened to as much testimony as I could I have drawn a few conclusions so far. 1) Donald Trump absolutely used the power of his office to steer an investigation to investigate a political rival, no matter what fallout might occur. 2) The MAGA cult doesn't give a *****. 3) Because the MAGA cult doesn't give a *****, there is about a 0% chance that the Senate will remove the president. And everyone has pretty much known this. Everything the Dems are doing isn't to try to actually change minds, or get Trump out of office. It's about making the case for 2020, and everyone know it. Can we at least agree to that? Are you as certain as all of these conclusions as you were in 2017 that Trump absolutely colluded with Putin to steal an election. All those posts you made about "where there's smoke there's fire", and all those posts you had pumping up people like Malcolm Nance and Max Boot as "patriots" (when we now know they were feeding you straight BS for three years)... How did that all work out again? Could it be, just possibly, that you're a partisan and not looking at this objectively at all while calling others "cultists"? Do you not hold anyone accountable for the three years of lies and division they sewed in this country pushing a now proven false theory of Russian collusion? The same one you bought into hook line and sinker? Did that not force you to reassess any of the information sources you rely on? Or did you just double down on the very next claim of "THIS TIME WE GOT HIM?!" Honest questions... 49 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: A quick summary of Trump defenses for those playing at home: -It's all hearsay, which is why we are forbidding the people who would have direct knowledge from testifying under oath. -It wasn't a quid pro quo, we just asked for a favor in return for something. -So what if it was a quid pro quo, everyone does it, which is why we disguised it. -What we really care about is getting rid of corruption, which is why got rid of the diplomat who was getting rid of corruption. By the way, why do people care about Trump awarding himself the bid for a summit? That was totally aboveboard and deserves no one looking into it. Also, lets ignore the EPA chief he appointed with a stunning track record of corruption that he refused to fire. -So what if he got rid of an ambassador! He has the absolute right to dismiss them for being Deep State Never Trumpers who he selected for their jobs. Stable genius. -We gave them the money anyway, so there is no reason to think there was any extortion. See, there it is, being released, right after reports arrived in the press that we were extorting them. I would say this is Marx brothers level material, but people here would accuse me of associating with a communist. ? Unsurprisingly this is not only inaccurate, it's ridiculous. 1
Tiberius Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Are you as certain as all of these conclusions as you were in 2017 that Trump absolutely colluded with Putin to steal an election. All those posts you made about "where there's smoke there's fire", and all those posts you had pumping up people like Malcolm Nance and Max Boot as "patriots" (when we now know they were feeding you straight BS for three years)... How did that all work out again? Could it be, just possibly, that you're a partisan and not looking at this objectively at all while calling others "cultists"? Do you not hold anyone accountable for the three years of lies and division they sewed in this country pushing a now proven false theory of Russian collusion? The same one you bought into hook line and sinker? Did that not force you to reassess any of the information sources you rely on? Or did you just double down on the very next claim of "THIS TIME WE GOT HIM?!" Honest questions... Stone's conviction shows how incomplete was the investigation, to say the least. He he lied to the investigators. Why?
Deranged Rhino Posted November 16, 2019 Author Posted November 16, 2019 Again, the defense of the whistleblower by the media -- while they hunt for whistleblowers within their own ranks who outed their protection of a proven pedophile (not to mention their lecherous executive management staff) -- is transparent garbage. The best way to assure the Whisteblower's safety is to go public with his name. There's no argument to this. But the reality is the media doesn't want to out the whistleblower because they relied on him as an anonymous source for much of the Russia garbage. Exposing him, exposes their complicity in the IC coup attempt. And his name is all over the upcoming OIG report (allegedly) -- can't have people connecting those dots, no sir. They've lost ALL credibility. 4 1
Nanker Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 1 hour ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Having watched and listened to as much testimony as I could I have drawn a few conclusions so far. 1) Donald Trump absolutely used the power of his office to steer an investigation to investigate a political rival, no matter what fallout might occur. 2) The MAGA cult doesn't give a *****. 3) Because the MAGA cult doesn't give a *****, there is about a 0% chance that the Senate will remove the president. And everyone has pretty much known this. Everything the Dems are doing isn't to try to actually change minds, or get Trump out of office. It's about making the case for 2020, and everyone know it. Can we at least agree to that? Not so fast... 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 16, 2019 Author Posted November 16, 2019 *But it's not partisan or political, am I right, @WhitewalkerInPhilly? At least have the stones to be honest about what's happening. This is a dangerous precedent being set by the left -- not because they're afraid of what Trump is doing to the constitution, but because they KNOW they cannot defeat him in 2020 at the ballot box. So who cares if they make partisan impeachment a standard political tool to wield. There'll be no long term repercussions to this, right? Just like there weren't any long term repercussions to Reid changing the rules in the Senate because he couldn't beat the GOP. How'd that work out again for the DNC and left? ...Right. But this time it'll be different, right? This time they'll go nuclear and then put it back in the box, never to be used again, right? Supporting open partisan warfare on the constitution and the foundation of the republic itself should not be encouraged. But when you're an NPC who's been programmed to believe ORANGE MAN = NAZI! anything is justified. (But MAGA is the cult... ) 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 36 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: You are wasting your time with that idiot. He can't even distort my words in a quote in a humorous way. ...LOL..my "dots" are actually Morse code to further confuse him......
Deranged Rhino Posted November 16, 2019 Author Posted November 16, 2019 Oops. It's like they will never learn that they're being baited to walk right into traps: 1 1
Nanker Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 When the Republicans retake the House, they should start legislation to name and eventually outlaw the Democrat party as a "Hate Group."
transplantbillsfan Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 Just checking in to see if posters are acting absolutely insane over here as they rabidly and blindly defend Trump... Senate won't vote to impeach him because they're spineless. But at least the American people vote him out of office in less than a year and we all get to see @Deranged Rhino with some new avatar for the ensuing year... Maybe this one... who knows? 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 1 minute ago, transplantbillsfan said: Just checking in to see if posters are acting absolutely insane over here as they rabidly and blindly defend Trump... Senate won't vote to impeach him because they're spineless. But at least the American people vote him out of office in less than a year and we all get to see @Deranged Rhino with some new avatar for the ensuing year... Maybe this one... who knows? ...fill me in on your views to my previous post.....I'm curious......if not, why not?..... ...how exactly would you define MAGA?.....is "make America great again" a fallacious ruse?.....did he seek the presidency for power, substanial salary, wealth, a book deal, his own library and free transportation on Air Force One and Marine One?....how many times has the fickle electorate yearned for a "Washington outsider" to clean up the stench?.....and how many times have "Washington insiders" run fraudulently as "outsiders" to no avail?....so we finally get a real "Washington outsider" who is crass, abrupt, condescending, abrasive, abusive, irascible, etc and is doing exactly what the establishment "good 'ol boyz network" needed?.....isn't it upside down on its ugly head?....haven't we found out so far that the "world's greatest democracy" has been exposed to unparalleled graft, corruption, misuse, abuse, subversive underhanded political partisanship, etc?....the same squeaky clean democracy we've tried to force feed on nations ripe with political corruption?...kinda like the "pot calling the kettle black"?.....so now we have the progressives continually on the attack to tear down this repugnant, imperialist nation, making us the world's apologists, destroying capitalism in favor of socialism to dilute the concentration of power with handouts to the "gimme crowd" so deserving.....where exactly do you stand on these issues, for or against?...just curious............
DC Tom Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 3 hours ago, Figster said: I agree with everything you say, Trumps behavior is consistent. Diplomacy need not apply. I think a big reason why the country will stay divided until the Trump presidency is over IMO. The country will be divided as long as Republicans have any power. Progressives simply can't accept that. 3 hours ago, Dr. Who said: Obama fired W's ambassadors en masse back in 2008. No one said a word. Just now, DC Tom said: The country will be divided as long as Republicans have any power. Progressives simply can't accept that. 3
Doc Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 13 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Just checking in to see if posters are acting absolutely insane over here as they rabidly and blindly defend Trump... Senate won't vote to impeach him because they're spineless. But at least the American people vote him out of office in less than a year and we all get to see @Deranged Rhino with some new avatar for the ensuing year... Maybe this one... who knows? Why should the Senate vote to impeach? If the Ukrainians don't admit there was any pressure/bribery/whateverthelatestfocusgroupbuzzwordis, there's no there there. 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 16, 2019 Author Posted November 16, 2019 Just now, Doc said: Why should the Senate vote to impeach? If the Ukrainians don't admit there was any pressure/bribery/whateverthelatestfocusgroupbuzzwordis, there's no there there. And yet there's a TON of there-there for the Bidens. Which is what @transplantbillsfan doesn't want to talk about since he's Biden's boy. And, he failed to listen when I and others warned him that the Ukraine stuff was going to assure Biden could never win. 1 1
Foxx Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 (edited) 30 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Just checking in to see if posters are acting absolutely insane over here as they rabidly and blindly defend Trump... Senate won't vote to impeach him because they're spineless. But at least the American people vote him out of office in less than a year and we all get to see @Deranged Rhino with some new avatar for the ensuing year... Maybe this one... who knows? remember... come January, your ability to predict things will no longer be allowed. you know, because, your going to lose your bet to me. Edited November 16, 2019 by Foxx
Doc Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And yet there's a TON of there-there for the Bidens. Which is what @transplantbillsfan doesn't want to talk about since he's Biden's boy. And, he failed to listen when I and others warned him that the Ukraine stuff was going to assure Biden could never win. No, they'll talk about it. They'll parrot the "he was investigated and cleared." What they won't admit is it was by Barry's corrupt admin. You know, the one that prepped Yovanovich on how to handle questions about Hunter Biden working for Burisma. Edited November 16, 2019 by Doc 1
Recommended Posts