The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG

[Foxx]

:facepalm:

https://twitter.com/FineWineDrinker/status/1202770783212314624

 

[Chef Jim]

43 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

And there wouldn't be a alt-right sub-forum on the Bills board? HALLELUJAH! 

 

pleaseeeeeeeeeee please please happen. 

We know we know. It sucks being a loser. 

[Tiberius]

5 minutes ago, Bakin said:

Nope.
No evidence of anything.

Just your feelings. 
Fortunately we don’t live in a banana republic...yet. But we are going that way with your deranged kangaroo courts of which you somehow approve. 

Lol, "I need a favor, though"   is evidence backed up by testimony and other documents, words of his advisors, etc. you are letting your emotions govern your thinking 

[B-Man]

 

ANALYSIS: TRUE.

 

 

 

 

 

.

[SoCal Deek]

I loved it when Nancy waved her finger at the country and told everyone that you can’t criticize a Catholic. I was born a Catholic. I don’t recall that whole ‘we don’t hate’ thing.

[Koko78]

33 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

Well, considering that's not what he actually said during the call, what evidence is your nonsense backed by again?

[Tiberius]

1 minute ago, Koko78 said:

 

Well, considering that's not what he actually said during the call, what evidence is your nonsense backed by again?

Oh did I not quote the doofus correctly, oh well

[Koko78]

Just now, Tiberius said:

 

 

Well, we know that being factually accurate isn't the left's thing, especially when there's feelings to be had.

[Tiberius]

6 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Well, we know that being factually accurate isn't the left's thing, especially when there's feelings to be had.

Ya, but Trump is right on, huh? 

 

Wow 

[Koko78]

31 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I loved it when Nancy waved her finger at the country and told everyone that you can’t criticize a Catholic.

 

Awesome, we're finally above the law! Eat *****, Protestants!

[Bakin]

47 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Lol, "I need a favor, though"   is evidence backed up by testimony and other documents, words of his advisors, etc. you are letting your emotions govern your thinking 

Nope. Not at all. 
you are making ***** up. 

[B-Man]

THE PEASANTS ARE REVOLTING

 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi charged the House Judiciary Committee with the preparation of articles of impeachment against President Trump yesterday. From the perspective of the Star Tribune editors, it’s probably the biggest news of the day. The AP story touting it sits at the top left of the Star Tribune home page (“Democrats say Trump impeachment charges must come swiftly”).

 

Readers, however, seem to be pursuing other interests.

 

Below is a screenshot of the Star Tribune’s top five most read online stories as of 5:45 a.m. (Central) this morning. The tragic loss of three members of the Minnesota National Guard in the helicopter accident yesterday afternoon comes in at number 1; it is featured in the center column of the home page. We see in the number 2 most read story that Twins fans continue to wait till next year. News of Trump’s prospective impeachment does not make the top 5.

 

 

It’s almost funny.

 

 

 

 

.

[SoCal Deek]

I’ll ask it again: What is the correct procedure when a President hears about bribery that may have been committed by a current or previous US government official? 
 

Still waiting for Adam, Jerry and Nancy to tell us the answer. 

[Tiberius]

12 minutes ago, Bakin said:

Nope. Not at all. 
you are making ***** up. 

Lol, head in the sand you do

[Bob in Mich]

I understand why Trump lies defending himself.  He is guilty and needs to deny his actions in order to avoid impeachment.

 

I understand why the Republican Senators and Congressmen lie defending Trump.  The Trump supporters will work to defeat them in their next election if they oppose him.

 

I understand why the right leaning media lies to defend Trump.  They are trying to mold public opinion to maintain Trump voter support as well as to bump their ratings.

 

I don't understand the reasoning behind why folks in message board discussions lie to defend Trump.  Why do you folks repeat lies in these discussions just to deflect or to avoid admitting obvious points? 

 

Now, if you honestly don't know you are repeating lies that is one matter and of course is understandable.   I am asking those in these conversations that just lie and throw out chaff to avoid answering 'incriminating' questions, what are you gaining in exchange for compromising your personal integrity?

[Deranged Rhino]

Projection is off the charts  

[B-Man]

 

Donald Trump was elected to break the elite. Of course they want to impeach him. 

 

“Trump’s supporters have known since election night that this day would eventually come.

 

After all, his sworn enemies have been openly promising it since before he was sworn into office!

 

They’ve used words like ‘resistance,’ ‘coup,’ ‘insurance policy,’ and ‘impeachment’ so often that, now that they are actually doing it, the American people — and Republicans especially — are offering a collective yawn.”

 

 

.

[Gavin in Va Beach]

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

:facepalm:

https://twitter.com/FineWineDrinker/status/1202770783212314624

 

 

Disgusting. An issue like this should emphasize reflection on the evidence and, if the evidence merits it, a reluctant decision to remove a president. The Democrats want to create a propaganda barnstorming spectacle, using their wormtongue's in the media to bully and/or brainwash the masses into a flippant exercise of gross injustice, ignorant of potential dire consequences.

 

That email posted in the tweet could be condensed thusly, "Let's Start a War'.

[3rdnlng]

9 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

I understand why Trump lies defending himself.  He is guilty and needs to deny his actions in order to avoid impeachment.

 

I understand why the Republican Senators and Congressmen lie defending Trump.  The Trump supporters will work to defeat them in their next election if they oppose him.

 

I understand why the right leaning media lies to defend Trump.  They are trying to mold public opinion to maintain Trump voter support as well as to bump their ratings.

 

I don't understand the reasoning behind why folks in message board discussions lie to defend Trump.  Why do you folks repeat lies in these discussions just to deflect or to avoid admitting obvious points? 

 

Now, if you honestly don't know you are repeating lies that is one matter and of course is understandable.   I am asking those in these conversations that just lie and throw out chaff to avoid answering 'incriminating' questions, what are you gaining in exchange for compromising your personal integrity?

Do you beat your wife often? How high does one have to be to ask that kind of a question (in your post) and expect people to answer it? You're either really, really stupid and basted in partisanship or too lazy to read enough to find out the truth. Which one is it? 

[Bob in Mich]

8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Do you beat your wife often? How high does one have to be to ask that kind of a question (in your post) and expect people to answer it? You're either really, really stupid and basted in partisanship or too lazy to read enough to find out the truth. Which one is it? 

 

Maybe I was making a point that posters could think on rather than answering directly. 

 

Why do you lie when defending Trump? 

 

Like the other day in some thread, you said something like, The Ukraine got their money before 9/30, so what's the problem?  You know the problem with the timing of the whistle blower and the release of the funds but pretended that issue didn't exist.  Why? 

 

8 hours ago, Rob's House said:

If this doesn't make you cringe you don't have a pulse.

 

 

Thanks. That was entertaining