Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
50 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Kirk > Picard 

I don't think this is the progressive default position. Also, I'm not really comfortable with you being correct about something.

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Love it. A Trump supporter complaing about corruption. Did you get a degree at Trump U? 

 

Are you a Libertarian? 


not that it matters, but Ivy League. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

#Boomerang

 

 

 

 

 

So, it's now guilty until proven innocent?

 

Ok, got it.

 

Pelosi has to lay off the freaking bottle. Being drunk with loose dentures is no way for an old person to go into their twilight years.

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

No it's more like trying to teach imbeciles 2+2=4 and the Trump supporters just answer, No! 2x2 =4 so Trump can't be guilty 

 

These Democrats think 1 and 1 is 57, so what's the fvcking difference?

Posted

I gotta give credit to the Dems for this again. They have singe handedly exposed two professions as frauds: 

 

federally elected officials and the bureaucracy 

 

AND

 

overeducated useless people
 

kudos!!  ? 
 

the longer this continues, the more people are waking up. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

...probably another senior moment, but wasn't there an unwritten rule that children of a President were "off limits" as far as criticism?....yet this Harvard skank (perhaps with her wife's approval) decides to attack Trump's kid Barron?.....no wonder IT was invited to testify with her strong Obama ties.....fair and balanced.....

Posted
10 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

...probably another senior moment, but wasn't there an unwritten rule that children of a President were "off limits" as far as criticism?....yet this Harvard skank (perhaps with her wife's approval) decides to attack Trump's kid Barron?.....no wonder IT was invited to testify with her strong Obama ties.....fair and balanced.....


Payback will make this seem like a walk in the park

Posted
5 minutes ago, row_33 said:


Payback will make this seem like a walk in the park

 

...LMAO....not an 'effin chance.....they will twist the need to delve into the children to expose the root cause of Trump's dirty deeds, misgivings, failed family life/child upbringing to arrive as the dastardly SOB we're dealing with today.....

Posted

I was going to post the other day, when I heard that Jonathan Turley was going to appear, that he's an excellent and balanced law prof and that they made a mistake inviting him. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...LMAO....not an 'effin chance.....they will twist the need to delve into the children to expose the root cause of Trump's dirty deeds, misgivings, failed family life/child upbringing to arrive as the dastardly SOB we're dealing with today.....


No...

 

trump will win in 2020 and with a GOP house will rain a total ***** storm on the Dems in revenge

Edited by row_33
Posted
Just now, row_33 said:


No...

 

trump will win in 2020 and with a GOP house will rain a total ***** strol in the Dems in revenge

1945: the Statue of Liberty is kaput! 

Posted
1 hour ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

...probably another senior moment, but wasn't there an unwritten rule that children of a President were "off limits" as far as criticism?....yet this Harvard skank (perhaps with her wife's approval) decides to attack Trump's kid Barron?.....no wonder IT was invited to testify with her strong Obama ties.....fair and balanced.....

 

No, not what happened.  Again: she attacked Trump for naming him "Barron" and violating the Constitutional prohibition against titles of nobility, which is not only not "attacking Trump's kid," but is infinitely stupider than that.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...