B-Man Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 The Impeachment Drive Climbs Into the Clown Car Slate, by Jeremy Stahl Original Article Nadler Hypes He Won’t Take Any Sh!t During Today’s Judiciary Pageant by Liz Sheld Original Article ?
Tiberius Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 10 minutes ago, dubs said: You didn’t share a single crime of Trump. seriously, with all the scrutiny and vitriol from the Democrats, why haven’t they tried to impeach him based on Michael Cohen’s crimes, if what you say is true. Let me save you some time, the answer is because they can’t prove any crime that trump committed. DR has said it a thousand times, at least, and it’s true. You’ve dug in so hard on this that you’re blinded. I honestly don’t care very much about Donald Trump. What I do care about is the uncovering of how corrupt Washington DC is and it’s exposure to the citizens of this country. I’d feel the same way if Pete B or Obama or anyone exposed this. what we are seeing is how far the establishment will go to protect their own lives that’s funded by taxpayer dollars and brokered through influence peddling and lack of accountability. Yes, he is individual number one, an unindicted coconspirator in the case. Presidents can't be indicted. Did you not know that, too?
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 so when are they going to seriously start the process? 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 Almost showtime.... c-span 3 for anyone that cares. 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 (edited) ..Committee selected Turley to testify, correct?..... Trump Impeachment Inquiry Published 39 mins ago Impeachment legal case is ‘woefully inadequate,’ 'dangerous,' legal expert Turley testifies By Brooke Singman | Fox News An expert legal witness plans to testify Wednesday that the current legal case for impeaching President Trump is “woefully inadequate” and “dangerous,” as the House Judiciary Committee holds its first impeachment inquiry hearing. According to an opening statement obtained by Fox News, Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University Law School, is prepared to tell lawmakers that, while he is not a "supporter" of the president, he is concerned about the “integrity” of the impeachment process based on the case being built against Trump. “One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,” Turley wrote in his opening statement. At the center of the impeachment inquiry, which began in September, is Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. During the call, Trump pressed Zelensky for investigations that could help him politically, including relating to former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. Turley, in his opening statement, said, "The reference to the Hunter Biden deal with Burisma should never have occurred and is worthy of the criticism of President Trump that it has unleashed. However, it is not a case of bribery." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-judiciary-committee-first-impeachment-hearing Edited December 4, 2019 by OldTimeAFLGuy 1
dubs Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Yes, he is individual number one, an unindicted coconspirator in the case. Presidents can't be indicted. Did you not know that, too? What’s impeachment then? If he committed a crime, impeach. It’s really simple. Then when he’s out of office, indict.
Gavin in Va Beach Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Almost showtime.... c-span 3 for anyone that cares. If the choices are watching that or punching myself in the balls, I'll have to think that over and get back to you... 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, Gavin in Va Beach said: If the choices are watching that or punching myself in the balls, I'll have to think that over and get back to you... I do not have that option. Guess I will watch it. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Posted December 4, 2019 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: What have I been predicting? Only two things I can think of are 1) Democrats eventually trying to outlaw the Democratic party as a hate group, and 2) a civil war. Neither of which has anything to do with Schiff leaking private phone records. 1
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 1 minute ago, dubs said: What’s impeachment then? If he committed a crime, impeach. It’s really simple. Then when he’s out of office, indict. impeachment just means the majority of a deliberative body votes for it, nothing more hopefully it has some evidence to justify the hassle it causes there isn't any here to justify it... so far.... but we're waiting...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 Jerry just swung the gavel... here we go.
B-Man Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 Impeachment is Backfiring in the Midwest by Matt Batzell Original Article House Democrats’ impeachment efforts are backfiring on them throughout the Midwest. Poll after poll is revealing how President Trump is gaining a stronger footing for re-election in key swing states. In Wisconsin, Trump is now more popular than he ever has been. Democrats have themselves to blame for increasing the odds of Trump’s second term through their Beltway focused impeachment hearings. For Democrats to take back the presidency they need to win in the Rust Belt and the upper Midwest. Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania (a combined 46 electoral votes) all went for Trump in 2016 and Trump barely lost Minnesota (10 electoral votes) Democrats Are Watering Down Impeachment into a Mere Recall Effort ? by Peggy Ryan Original Article 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Almost showtime.... c-span 3 for anyone that cares. You are not going to watch it on the "big" networks ? With their experts explaining what you just heard. I just put on Tony Bennet, and I think I will wrap a few Christmas presents. . . 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 Holy crap.... Russia + Trump + Mueller. Jerry's opening statement has Trump colluding with Russia to throw the 2016 election. And, Nadler is disingenuously calling this an "impeachment proceeding". 1 1
DC Tom Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 If Nadler eats one more dinner mint, he's going to explode. 2
Albwan Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 8 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Holy crap.... Russia + Trump + Mueller. Jerry's opening statement has Trump colluding with Russia to throw the 2016 election. And, Nadler is disingenuously calling this an "impeachment proceeding". Its like a Pelaton, can't stop now !
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 7 minutes ago, DC Tom said: If Nadler eats one more dinner mint, he's going to explode. And finally, monsieur, a wafer-thin mint.
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 Doug Collins is babbling... but this was funny "America will see why most Americans don't go to law school." There are no fact witnesses over the next few days. 1
Gavin in Va Beach Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 8 minutes ago, DC Tom said: If Nadler eats one more dinner mint, he's going to explode. But it's wafer thin! 3
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: Doug Collins is babbling... but this was funny "America will see why most Americans don't go to law school." There are no fact witnesses over the next few days. great guard for the Sixers and good NBA analyst
Nanker Posted December 4, 2019 Posted December 4, 2019 12 minutes ago, DC Tom said: If Nadler eats one more dinner mint, he's going to explode.
Recommended Posts