Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

I'm going to guess the release is either going to be Wednesday morning, or whatever the second day is going to be, just to crap on Nadler's show trial...

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


They've got a funny way of going about it. <_<

 

 

Reverse psychology/pity votes. If they act stupidly and self-destructive enough, people will feel badly for them and elect them!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol:

 

 

Reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the attorney withdrew because Biden is pulling something that is unethical.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Koko78 said:

 

Reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the attorney withdrew because Biden is pulling something that is unethical.


Changing lawyers buys you some time from facing justice 

Posted

So if the Senate was Dem majority then Trump would be kicked out without a shred of credible evidence presented?

 

careful what you wish for liberals....  you won’t last two seconds in a real crisis, you never have before...

 

 

 

 

Posted

 

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

Reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the attorney withdrew because Biden is pulling something that is unethical.

 

I bet Hunter wishes he'd withdrawn...

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

A political mag up here offers bounties of thousands for useful info as to why someone’s lawyer fired the client

Posted
11 minutes ago, Doc said:

I bet Hunter wishes he'd withdrawn...

 

At this point, Joe may be wishing he did as well...

Posted

I've been gone since just before the holiday.

 

Is it over? Is he impeached? Did they provide the proof? Is Pence the new president?

 

No?

 

Not yet?

 

Geez. It's almost like they don't have a case at all and are just trying to remove Trump from office because he beat Hillary.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, IDBillzFan said:

I've been gone since just before the holiday.

 

Is it over? Is he impeached? Did they provide the proof? Is Pence the new president?

 

No?

 

Not yet?

 

Geez. It's almost like they don't have a case at all and are just trying to remove Trump from office because he beat Hillary.

 

6304603_sd.jpg

 

Posted

So what was this magic about Hillary that they have totally freaked out over her losing?

 

seriously, where is it?

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, row_33 said:

Hoho heehee haha

 

its a liberal Dem family

 

move along, they are totally above the law...

 

 

...he needs to have the case moved to Delaware where he can get a fair trial...............

Posted
1 hour ago, IDBillzFan said:

I've been gone since just before the holiday.

 

Is it over? Is he impeached? Did they provide the proof? Is Pence the new president?

 

No?

 

Not yet?

 

Geez. It's almost like they don't have a case at all and are just trying to remove Trump from office because he beat Hillary. he stopped their graft.


Fixed! 

Posted
1 minute ago, Hedge said:

 

 

 

Only the out of touch DNC could come up with this idea... what's more boring and off putting for the average American to listen to than a bunch of self aggrandizing bureaucrats?

 

A bunch of self aggrandizing lawyers. 

 

No one will watch this.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Only the out of touch DNC could come up with this idea... what's more boring and off putting for the average American to listen to than a bunch of self aggrandizing bureaucrats?

 

A bunch of self aggrandizing lawyers. 

 

No one will watch this.  


I will.  :wallbash:  ?

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Sad 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

 

Is this the part of the process where a bunch of 'scholars' tell the nation that we should proceed to a trial when NONE of the 'witnesses' can testify to having actually witnessed ANYTHING , or having ANY first hand knowledge of the events, or can even state a SINGLE crime that they believe was committed!  This should make for some great theater.

  • Sad 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Is this the part of the process where a bunch of 'scholars' tell the nation that we should proceed to a trial when NONE of the 'witnesses' can testify to having actually witnessed ANYTHING , or having ANY first hand knowledge of the events, or can even state a SINGLE crime that they believe was committed!  This should make for some great theater.

 

PishPosh!

Enough with your "normal" standards of jurisprudence, peasant!

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...