B-Man Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 Democrats’ ugly Christmas present to the nation New York Post, by Editorial Original Article House Democrats’ impeachment show moves to Jerry Nadler’s Judiciary Committee this week — but don’t expect the proceedings to get any more serious. Sometime before Nadler starts things off at 10 a.m. Wednesday, Intelligence Committee chief Adam Schiff is supposed to send along his final report — which is apparently to be all the evidence the House will consider on the Ukraine matter, despite the near-complete lack of first-hand testimony. Judiciary is simply going to “consider” whether the wrongdoings that Schiff alleges actually constitute “constitutional grounds for impeachment,” with experts brought in to opine on whether President Trump’s actions warrant such a grave step. .
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 It was so much easier before the internet, Schiff back then would have been writing all the news cue cards for ABC/NBC/CBS to parrot and nobody would be able to begin to challenge them 2
BillsFanNC Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, row_33 said: It was so much easier before the internet, Schiff back then would have been writing all the news cue cards for ABC/NBC/CBS to parrot and nobody would be able to begin to challenge them True, but without the internet/social media Trump or someone like him isn't elected in the first place and there is no need for the coup and all this nonsense that has followed from it. Edited December 2, 2019 by BillsFanNC 1
B-Man Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 This impeachment drive is a huge political bust for Democrats. ........................ . 1
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: True, but without the internet/social media Trump or someone like him isn't elected in the first place and there is no need for the coup and all this nonsense that has followed from it. Nixon won and faced the toady media’s wrath i will sadly believe he was guilty but after watching this garbage pile up, there are grounds to maybe doubt it was nothing but a media/Dem crock of crap
Albwan Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: This impeachment drive is a huge political bust for Democrats. ........................ . Funny part is they are STILL loudly declaring it's a slam dunk on cnn, yahoo, huff etc. However, The Democratic National Committee has a money problem. And that could hurt its nominee’s chances of beating President Donald Trump in 2020. In the first four months of 2019, the party spent more than it raised and added $3 million in new debt. In the same period, its Republican counterpart was stockpiling cash. Shocking.
Warren Zevon Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, row_33 said: Nixon won and faced the toady media’s wrath i will sadly believe he was guilty Do you pity criminals often or only when they identify with your politics?
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 The headlines today on the local news were the report is coming out to seal off the very convincing testimony against Trump so far
Albwan Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 10 minutes ago, row_33 said: The headlines today on the local news were the report is coming out to seal off the very convincing testimony against Trump so far My god then....finally, its here!
B-Man Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 Trump lawyers to Jerry Nadler: We won’t participate in your sham Wednesday law professor hearing The impeachment torch is about to be passed from Adam Schiff (House Intelligence Committee) to Jerry Nadler (House Judiciary Committee). Nadler scheduled a “hearing” for Wednesday, but it’s not an evidentiary hearing and the witnesses (as of this writing) are unknown. What is known it that there will be three pro-impeachment law professors called by Democrats to opine on what constitutes an impeachable offense. (Spoiler — if Democrats are calling the law professors, they will opine that anything and everything Trump did is an impeachable offense). Republicans will be allowed one legal expert to say the opposite. In other words, it’s a show hearing, meant to give the pro-impeachment mainstream media a news cycle dominated (by numbers) by pro-impeachment opinions. Trump’s lawyers sent a letter tonight to Nadler rejecting the premise and procedure of the hearing, and refusing to participate. Politico reports: . 2
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Gary Busey said: Do you pity criminals often or only when they identify with your politics? What are my politics, according to you.... Red Tory is the closest thing I can see on paper It has ruled Canada a few times over the last 50 years 1 hour ago, Albwan said: My god then....finally, its here! Hey whatever this is how a story works in our society a key witness is asked what evidence there is, says his speculations, this is totally ignored by the press good enough for the media and those who believe it
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Posted December 2, 2019 Because the DNC is not interested in what's best for the country. They're not interested in due process or actual justice. They want their power back. Nothing more. Enemies of the people. 4 2
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Because the DNC is not interested in what's best for the country. They're not interested in due process or actual justice. They want their power back. Nothing more. Enemies of the people. They've got a funny way of going about it. 2
B-Man Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 Gosh, golly and gee, this little tidbit from Catherine Herridge about the whistleblower seems kinda sorta important, yeah? Especially since they are moving into a new ‘phase’ of the impeachment circus. The wording was confusing? Huh? Alrighty then. From CBS: CBS News has reviewed documents that show the anonymous whistleblower reached out to the intelligence community watchdog on October 8 to clarify the nature of his or her contact with Democratic majority staff of the House Intelligence Committee before the complaint was filed. The whistleblower acknowledged reaching out to the committee, but claimed that nothing substantial was discussed and that the staff member directed them to go through official channels, according to the “Memorandum of Investigative Activity,” provided to House and Senate Intelligence Committee leadership by intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) Michael Atkinson. The form is dated October 18 and documents the October 8 outreach by the whistleblower. Republicans have seized on the contact with Democratic committee staff to question the credibility of the whistleblower, while Democrats have downplayed the significance. Of course Democrats are downplaying this, they need the leaker … sorry, the whistleblower … to be credible. Pretty tricking wording there. "Congress or congressional committee(s)." Easy to see how someone smart enough to work for the CIA would get confused. . 2 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Back to 2016? That is hilarious. 1
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Posted December 2, 2019 Hoho heehee haha its a liberal Dem family move along, they are totally above the law...
Recommended Posts