DC Tom Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 10 minutes ago, row_33 said: censure for what? For being a moron that can't conduct foreign policy without even avoiding the vague appearance of a conflict of interest. As consistent as I've been in insisting this "evidence" is ambiguous and nothing more than hearsay and interpretation through a priori assumptions, the other side of that is that Trump was too damn stupid to avoid creating the ambiguity in the first place. And don't forget the other of the two reasons I wanted Trump as president: to encourage Congress to do its job and exercise proper oversight. So censure him for being a reckless little man-child, and exercise the goddamn oversight already. Just now, Gary Busey said: Bipartisan censure on the above basis would be oodles more exciting and better for the country than impeachment. And you probably could get a decent number of Republicans on board with it, I'll bet.
Westside Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 22 hours ago, Tiberius said: If we are still allowed by the Trump Dynasty to write history in the future perhaps these pieces of evidence will shed light on more criminal activity by the president Parnas Hands Over Video, Audio Recordings That Include Trump, Giuliani The House Intelligence Committee now has access to several video and audio recordings as well as photographs that include President Trump and his attorney Rudy Giuliani. Hell, they have biden on video bragging about how he extorted Ukraine and the looney left doesn't give 2 Schiff's about it.
Albwan Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Nancy Pelosi's worst nightmare slowly comes to life by Monica Showalter Original Article Support for Impeachment Collapses Among Black, Hispanic Voters by Haris Alic Original Article Worst nightmare MUHAHAHAHA I think not ! Edited November 26, 2019 by Albwan 1
row_33 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 13 minutes ago, DC Tom said: For being a moron that can't conduct foreign policy without even avoiding the vague appearance of a conflict of interest. As consistent as I've been in insisting this "evidence" is ambiguous and nothing more than hearsay and interpretation through a priori assumptions, the other side of that is that Trump was too damn stupid to avoid creating the ambiguity in the first place. And don't forget the other of the two reasons I wanted Trump as president: to encourage Congress to do its job and exercise proper oversight. So censure him for being a reckless little man-child, and exercise the goddamn oversight already. And you probably could get a decent number of Republicans on board with it, I'll bet. DC, if i despise you i can turn everything you do into a conflict of interest, and tell the media how to scream about it 24/7 1
KRC Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 12 minutes ago, DC Tom said: And you probably could get a decent number of Republicans on board with it, I'll bet. You are probably correct. It would save face for Reps, as well as Dems in purple districts.
row_33 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 his demeanour is course? like LBJ or Andrew Jackson? get over it liberals, you got a long time to go before regaining the White House. LOL!!
Westside Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 16 minutes ago, DC Tom said: For being a moron that can't conduct foreign policy without even avoiding the vague appearance of a conflict of interest. As consistent as I've been in insisting this "evidence" is ambiguous and nothing more than hearsay and interpretation through a priori assumptions, the other side of that is that Trump was too damn stupid to avoid creating the ambiguity in the first place. And don't forget the other of the two reasons I wanted Trump as president: to encourage Congress to do its job and exercise proper oversight. So censure him for being a reckless little man-child, and exercise the goddamn oversight already. And you probably could get a decent number of Republicans on board with it, I'll bet. I wouldn't give the corrupt left one inch at all. The President of the United states should never be censured. That's f'n ridiculous to even suggest. How about censuring you? Would you be for that? Whether I agree with your views or not, I would fight against that with everything I have. Give the socialist pigs exactly what they deserve, absolutely nothing!
Warren Zevon Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 20 minutes ago, DC Tom said: And you probably could get a decent number of Republicans on board with it, I'll bet. No way - the cult is strong. Just now, westside2 said: I wouldn't give the corrupt left one inch at all. The President of the United states should never be censured. That's f'n ridiculous to even suggest. How about censuring you? Would you be for that? Whether I agree with your views or not, I would fight against that with everything I have. Give the socialist pigs exactly what they deserve, absolutely nothing! 1
Albwan Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: No way - the cult is strong. This message brought to you by the bald pp head at cnn Personally I would rather be in the cult of Trump as opposed to the cult of lil brian stelter ....anyday Edited November 26, 2019 by Albwan
Westside Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 1 minute ago, Gary Busey said: No way - the cult is strong. Yeah, the cult of freedom runs strong in me. 1
row_33 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 can we start to try to delete the text from tibs and gary and "the likely lads" every time we respond to them? i really don't want to be bothered by anything they have to say, worse than the subway hoboes who smell like formaldehyde
Westside Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 Just now, row_33 said: can we start to try to delete the text from tibs and gary and "the likely lads" every time we respond to them? I like seeing there idiocy on full display.
Warren Zevon Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 1 minute ago, westside2 said: Yeah, the cult of freedom runs strong in me. Presidents have been censured before. Have you always felt so strongly on the topic?
row_33 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 1 minute ago, westside2 said: I like seeing there idiocy on full display. we don't.... we have put them on ignore... and honestly wish they were gone from here, really wish it...
Westside Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Yes, especially when they committed no crime. 1
Warren Zevon Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 Just now, westside2 said: Yes, especially when they committed no crime. I think you're confused. One who is censured is not accused of a crime. So you're against censuring all together?
Foxx Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 40 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Senate..... 2
Recommended Posts