Jump to content

The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, dubs said:


You didn’t share a single crime of Trump. 
 

seriously, with all the scrutiny and vitriol from the Democrats, why haven’t they tried to impeach him based on Michael Cohen’s crimes, if what you say is true. 
 

Let me save you some time, the answer is because they can’t prove any crime that trump committed. 
 

DR has said it a thousand times, at least, and it’s true. You’ve dug in so hard on this that you’re blinded. 
 

I honestly don’t care very much about Donald Trump. What I do care about is the uncovering of how corrupt Washington DC is and it’s exposure to the citizens of this country. I’d feel the same way if Pete B or Obama or anyone exposed this. 
 

what we are seeing is how far the establishment will go to protect their own lives that’s funded by taxpayer dollars and brokered through influence peddling and lack of accountability. 
 

 

Yes, he is individual number one, an unindicted coconspirator in the case. Presidents can't be indicted. Did you not know that, too? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..Committee selected Turley to testify, correct?.....
 
Published 39 mins ago

Impeachment legal case is ‘woefully inadequate,’ 'dangerous,' legal expert Turley testifies

By Brooke Singman | Fox News

 

An expert legal witness plans to testify Wednesday that the current legal case for impeaching President Trump is “woefully inadequate” and “dangerous,” as the House Judiciary Committee holds its first impeachment inquiry hearing.

According to an opening statement obtained by Fox News, Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University Law School, is prepared to tell lawmakers that, while he is not a "supporter" of the president, he is concerned about the “integrity” of the impeachment process based on the case being built against Trump.

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,” Turley wrote in his opening statement.

 

At the center of the impeachment inquiry, which began in September, is Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. During the call, Trump pressed Zelensky for investigations that could help him politically, including relating to former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter.

 

Turley, in his opening statement, said, "The reference to the Hunter Biden deal with Burisma should never have occurred and is worthy of the criticism of President Trump that it has unleashed. However, it is not a case of bribery."

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-judiciary-committee-first-impeachment-hearing

 

 

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Yes, he is individual number one, an unindicted coconspirator in the case. Presidents can't be indicted. Did you not know that, too? 


What’s impeachment then?  If he committed a crime, impeach. It’s really simple. Then when he’s out of office, indict. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dubs said:


What’s impeachment then?  If he committed a crime, impeach. It’s really simple. Then when he’s out of office, indict. 
 

 

 

impeachment just means the majority of a deliberative body votes for it, nothing more

 

hopefully it has some evidence to justify the hassle it causes

 

there isn't any here to justify it... so far.... but we're waiting...  :D

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impeachment is Backfiring in the Midwest

by Matt Batzell

 

Original Article

 

House Democrats’ impeachment efforts are backfiring on them throughout the Midwest. Poll after poll is revealing how President Trump is gaining a stronger footing for re-election in key swing states. In Wisconsin, Trump is now more popular than he ever has been. Democrats have themselves to blame for increasing the odds of Trump’s second term through their Beltway focused impeachment hearings. For Democrats to take back the presidency they need to win in the Rust Belt and the upper Midwest. Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania (a combined 46 electoral votes) all went for Trump in 2016 and Trump barely lost Minnesota (10 electoral votes)

 

 

 

 

 

Democrats Are Watering Down Impeachment into a Mere Recall Effort ?

by Peggy Ryan

 

Original Article

 

 

 

 

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Almost showtime.... c-span 3 for anyone that cares. 

 

 

You are not going to watch it on the "big" networks ?

 

With their experts explaining what you just heard.  :lol:

 

 

I just put on Tony Bennet, and I think I will wrap a few Christmas presents.

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Holy crap.... Russia + Trump + Mueller.  Jerry's opening statement has Trump colluding with Russia to throw the  2016 election.

:blink:

And, Nadler is disingenuously calling this an "impeachment proceeding". 

 

Its like a Pelaton, can't stop now !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:

Doug Collins is babbling... but this was funny "America will see why most Americans don't go to law school."

There are no fact witnesses over the next few days. 



 

 

great guard for the Sixers and good NBA analyst

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...