Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

1. Tight End situation. It's already been reported that Mark Campbell's rehab is ahead of schedule. Tim Euhus is also doing very well with his. Also, Jason Peters move to OT is not as locked in stone as earlier reported. TE may not be as big of a need as originally thought.

 

2. Running Back - Once the TH situation is resolved, we will bring in a veteran RB to backup WM. We need someone who could start for 4-6 weeks if WM got hurt. Hearst is probably not durable enough to be counted on to start if WM gets hurt.

 

3. Nate Clements - Nate brings a lot of things to the team but he's not a great cover CB. (for example, Jacksonville game). But the turnovers and punt returns will make him a high profile guy who others might overpay for.

Posted

I'm a bit skeptical. I would like to see at least some clue as to how this info found its way out of OBD.

Posted
Number 3 actually came from OBD ?

301421[/snapback]

 

 

Of course. I heard Donahoe's agent's babysitter's hairdresser's therapist's electician's dentist's mechanic say so. A WGR exclusive.

Posted
Of course.  I heard Donahoe's agent's babysitter's hairdresser's therapist's electician's dentist's mechanic say so.  A WGR exclusive.

301469[/snapback]

 

It was the dentist's mechanic's son... please get your sources straight.

Posted
It was the dentist's mechanic's son... please get your sources straight.

301490[/snapback]

Would you switch your avatar to something a little less creepy? Bea Arthur comes to mind. Please?

Posted
Would you switch your avatar to something a little less creepy?  Bea Arthur comes to mind.  Please?

301494[/snapback]

Bea might be a little too manly for Steve. :(

Posted
Disclaimer:  These tidbits did not come from TD but were the opinions of someone on the Bills staff.

301499[/snapback]

 

Someone you know?

Posted
Disclaimer:  These tidbits did not come from TD but were the opinions of someone on the Bills staff.

301499[/snapback]

The landscaper?

Posted
I think getting rid of NC now would be one of the biggest mistakes we could make.

301429[/snapback]

 

I agree. He is a perfect candidate to work a Peerless Price type trade with next season.

Posted

skeptical of this post.

 

#3 is BS. CLements IS a good cover corner. That's why so few people threw his way all year. That's why teams picked on the other side. That's why Nate has more INTs than any current Bill. That's why Nate was a probowl alternate.

 

garbage

Posted
Nate brings a lot of things to the team but he's not a great cover CB. (for example, Jacksonville game)

Whoever this mysterious employee is, I hope to god they never have any input on player evaluation or personell decisions.

Posted
Disclaimer:  These tidbits did not come from TD but were the opinions of someone on the Bills staff.

301499[/snapback]

Ron Mexico?

 

Jeff

Posted
1.  Tight End situation.  It's already been reported that Mark Campbell's rehab is ahead of schedule.  Tim Euhus is also doing very well with his.  Also, Jason Peters move to OT is not as locked in stone as earlier reported.  TE may not be as big of a need as originally thought.

 

2.  Running Back - Once the TH situation is resolved, we will bring in a veteran RB to backup WM.  We need someone who could start for 4-6 weeks if WM got hurt.  Hearst is probably not durable enough to be counted on to start if WM gets hurt.

 

3.  Nate Clements - Nate brings a lot of things to the team but he's not a great cover CB.  (for example, Jacksonville game).  But the turnovers and punt returns will make him a high profile guy who others might overpay for.

301410[/snapback]

I argue that Nate is a very good cover guy: ie: Cincy game!

×
×
  • Create New...