Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
58 minutes ago, Dan said:

6-2 for the first time in 27 years... yet I read this thread and you'd think the Bills were one of the worst teams in the league?   Why do so many people expect complete perfection in every play, every pass? Or blow outs in every game?

 

It would be nice if more people could just enjoy a good season after so many bad ones, and stop trying to set the stage to say I told you so when we don't win the Super Bowl. 

 

Amen  brother been saying the same thing, its really pathetic all the whining going on. The packers and patriots must be worse than us with the way they played today.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

Yep. It's ridiculous. It's going to hurt them eventually. 3 years in, does this ***** ever change with him? I think not.

Would you prefer an offensive wunderkind like say, Adam Gase? The Bills are winning, but leave it up to some in our fan base to complain about style points along the way. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

Would you prefer an offensive wunderkind like say, Adam Gase? The Bills are winning, but leave it up to some in our fan base to complain about style points along the way. 

 

Scott is notorious negative Nancy and is only happy when complaining.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, vincec said:

If the Bills could have gotten some pressure on him I think he would have looked a lot worse. He was very comfortable in the pocket most of the time.

You're not putting pressure on anyone with the likes of Hughes, Murphy and Lawson.

Posted

We're good enough to beat the bad teams and just need to be a little better against the good ones......having said that, 6-2 is a good record to have. Let's try to enjoy it

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Seven-N-Nine said:

 

No, I'm pointing out why the national media thinks the way the do about the Bills.

 

Everyone’s on to you.      No need to lie 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Seven-N-Nine said:

 

They don't beat bad teams convincingly, and they don't beat good teams at all.

 

You're quite the crusader.  What was your username before you got banned and came back under this name?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Seven-N-Nine said:

 

From NFL.com, sounds about right...

Redskins lost by 5 (Eagles), 10 (Cowboys), 16 (Bears), 21 (Giants), 26 (Isis), 9 (49ers), and 10 (Vikings).

 

We beat them by 15.  This team isn't as historically bad as the national media seems to be pushing.  Any double digit win against an NFL team is a quality win and this negativity about our schedule is starting to bother me.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Seven-N-Nine said:

 

They don't beat bad teams convincingly, and they don't beat good teams at all.

 

6-2.   Sorry your dumb screen name prediction didn’t work out.  

 

Maybe it’s time to change it again ??

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Teddy KGB said:

 

We talking bout the pats or the Seahawks ? 

 You could, but in the eyes of the national media, you don't think they view those teams differently, as in given the benefit of the doubt?  Bills needed to beat the Pats like the Ravens just did if they wanted national respect.

Posted
Just now, Seven-N-Nine said:

 You could, but in the eyes of the national media, you don't think they view those teams differently, as in given the benefit of the doubt?  Bills needed to beat the Pats like the Ravens just did if they wanted national respect.

 

Does the “national media” have power to grant us extra wins ? 

 

No one cares, the media is fake news ?

×
×
  • Create New...