LabattBlue Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 Does it really matter that much who the 4th WR is, especially when the top 3 are pretty much under utilized?
MDH Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 4 hours ago, CSBill said: At this point, McKenzie is more productive than Foster. He was missed last week as it seemed the Bills stupidly took what has been an effective aspect of their game and shelved it. Moreover, then they hardly used Foster (1 target). Answer: McKenzie I don't get why they activated Foster last week over McKenzie with the weather. Jet sweeps would have been way more effective in those conditions than the deep ball. That said, Id like to see Foster get the start today. The big play needs to find its way into this offense and Foster and Brown on the field at the same time is the best way.
Freddie's Dead Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 10 hours ago, MJS said: Can someone explain why and how it started to call a player by the wrong name? Last time, pay attention. When Isaiah McKenzie was signed to the Bills, the thread announcing his arrival called him "Isaac McKittrick". The War Games references started, the rest is history. Anybody else have a problem with McKittrick, go ***** yourself. 2 hours ago, ROCBillsBeliever said: I always wonder whether the real McKenzie ever reads these posts, and what he thinks about the whole Mckittrick charade ? We give nicknames all the time. You guys should be pissed off at the OP who glossed him McKittrick. 1
Don Otreply Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 Not concerned about Foster, more concerned about Daboll dialing up plays that work. Go Bills!!!
Don Otreply Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 4 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said: Try sitting Duke. Play Foster and mckittrick Naw, play them all ?
MJS Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 7 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said: Last time, pay attention. When Isaiah McKenzie was signed to the Bills, the thread announcing his arrival called him "Isaac McKittrick". The War Games references started, the rest is history. Anybody else have a problem with McKittrick, go ***** yourself. We give nicknames all the time. You guys should be pissed off at the OP who glossed him McKittrick. I suggest a warm glass of milk before bed. You'll feel much better. 1
Saxum Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 10 hours ago, ILBillsfan said: I think McKenzie attacks the edges harder on offense than Roberts and is a more viable receiving option than Roberts. McKenzie also offers more than Foster in the receiving game as well. This year not sure what the deal is with Foster but he didn't even make an attempt for that ball that landed a bit behind due too the wind knocking it down. I think Roberts hands are better however.
That's No Moon Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 5 hours ago, ALF said: I'll go with Isaiah McKenzie , 8 tgt and 7 rec . Allen not yet in sync for a long pass to Foster , hope it's the OL and not Josh. how many of those targets are 6 inches long?
ALF Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 7 minutes ago, That's No Moon said: how many of those targets are 6 inches long? 112 yards 7 catches
GunnerBill Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 5 hours ago, GunnerBill said: This is what I would do. I got the decision to activate Duke and make him a big part of the gameplan against Tennessee. I said it on here the morning of the game - their corners are really good sticky guys who are hard to separate from but who have a vulnerability against size and strength. Since then I know he had the nice catch against Miami but Duke's struggles separating have shown up on tape. Particularly last week when if I said he had clear separation from the corner twice all game that would be a stretch. The Redskins are going to play a lot of zone on the back end, I think let's get our speed guys on the field. And it is what they have done too. Right call.
Patrick Duffy Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 8 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: And it is what they have done too. Right call. Cool, you want some cookies? 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 14 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: And it is what they have done too. Right call. Thanks. I'm like the Lannister midget. I eat chicken salad sandwiches and know things. 1
Hebert19 Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 Answer today is both. Duke must still be injured.
The Jokeman Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 13 hours ago, ILBillsfan said: Last week they went w Foster . I feel like McKenzie adds a bit more than Foster with the use in the run game as well. They tried to use Williams last week and he was not able to threaten the edge like McKenzie brings. Im Hoping McKenzie is back in and Foster is on the inactive list McKenzie is the better player yet Foster can give you more options as he has the size to lineup outside etc. With Duke inactive am okay with both but if I have to count on one it's McKenzie.
That's No Moon Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 37 minutes ago, ALF said: 112 yards 7 catches Yes, my question was based around the fact that the vast majority of McZenzie's production has been on a 6 inch pass on jet sweep action, not from running routes down the field.
frostbitmic Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 I'm guessing JA will throw a 50 yard bomb to Foster today ... It'll hit Foster in the back of his helmet. McKittrick will gain 40 yards today, run someone over and will be forever known as McKittruck.
That's No Moon Posted November 3, 2019 Posted November 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, frostbitmic said: I'm guessing JA will throw a 50 yard bomb to Foster today ... It'll hit Foster in the back of his helmet. What if Allen threw it the other direction around the planet and hit him in the face?
Recommended Posts