Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Last week they went w Foster .  I feel like McKenzie adds a bit more than Foster with the use in the run game as well.  They tried to use Williams last week and he was not able to threaten the edge like McKenzie brings.  

 

Im Hoping McKenzie is back in and Foster is on the inactive list

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Foster didn’t impress with his ball tracking on the long throw last week. That would’ve been huge. He overran the ball when, if he were tracking, he stops short and hauls it in. Rusted on the bench.


McKenzie at least shows something.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

McKittrick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster.  All McKittrick does is make plays.  Foster didn't do ***** last week with his chance.  McD is supposed to be about playing those who produce, so no way McKittrick sits again. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Special K said:

I prefer McKenzie to be active over Foster. He has made plays when given the opportunity, whereas Foster has not.

Foster has been an invisible non factor all season.  Something is wrong with him and I don't have the answer. Playing McKenzie is the right call. He's made big plays and brings misdirection to our offense. Neither are great but right now McK is the better contributor. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
32 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said:

McKittrick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster.  All McKittrick does is make plays.  Foster didn't do ***** last week with his chance.  McD is supposed to be about playing those who produce, so no way McKittrick sits again. 

Can someone explain why and how it started to call a player by the wrong name?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Warcodered said:

Couldn't Andre Roberts fit that role McKenzie has while still having Foster if he ever decides to wake up.

 

I think McKenzie attacks the edges harder on offense than Roberts and is a more viable receiving option than Roberts.  McKenzie also offers more than Foster in the receiving game as well.  This year not sure what the deal is with Foster but he didn't even make an attempt for that ball that landed a bit behind due too the wind knocking it down.

Posted (edited)

Ball tracking was a problem last year with Foster on the deep ball as well.  The miss at New England comes to mind.  It's whoever Allen is more comfortable with.  Foster is about five or so inches taller than McKenzie so you have to factor that in.

Edited by Doc Brown
Posted
13 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Wait is Foster not his real name?

People call McKenzie by the name "McKittrick" for some reason. Just trying to understand why.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Foster has been an invisible non factor all season.  Something is wrong with him and I don't have the answer. Playing McKenzie is the right call. He's made big plays and brings misdirection to our offense. Neither are great but right now McK is the better contributor. 

Foster has how many targets?  Only targets I recall are on deep balls and Josh hasn't been close to hitting them.  I don't know why they don't get him involved.

Posted
2 hours ago, MJS said:

Can someone explain why and how it started to call a player by the wrong name?

 

It virtually always stems from the original post of a drunken post-loss thread. Fitzgibbons.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, ILBillsfan said:

Last week they went w Foster .  I feel like McKenzie adds a bit more than Foster with the use in the run game as well.  They tried to use Williams last week and he was not able to threaten the edge like McKenzie brings.  

 

Im Hoping McKenzie is back in and Foster is on the inactive list

Why not have them both active and sit Senorise Perry?

Posted
5 hours ago, Warcodered said:

Couldn't Andre Roberts fit that role McKenzie has while still having Foster if he ever decides to wake up.

 

No. 

3 hours ago, MJS said:

Can someone explain why and how it started to call a player by the wrong name?

 

Dates back to when we signed him someone started a thread saying we had signed McKittrick and it has just stuck. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

At this point, McKenzie is more productive than Foster. He was missed last week as it seemed the Bills stupidly took what has been an effective aspect of their game and shelved it. Moreover, then they hardly used Foster (1 target).

 

Answer: McKenzie

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

No. 

 

Dates back to when we signed him someone started a thread saying we had signed McKittrick and it has just stuck. 

So how is McKittrick related to Jack Nicklaus?  ?

Edited by Ridgewaycynic2013
Posted

I'll go with Isaiah McKenzie , 8 tgt and 7 rec .  Allen not yet in sync for a long pass to Foster , hope it's the OL and not Josh.

×
×
  • Create New...