Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Miami traded Minkah Fitzpatrick who had 2 ints , and traded their LT Tunsil , Fitz and Rosen don't have a chance.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, Cripple Creek said:

It's all about the QB, Happy, always has been. 

No, it’s not. That’s a cliche, and it’s just not true.
 

 It’s also about putting the QB in a position to succeed, by having a good offensive system, a competent o-line, and most important, some weapons he can exploit, like receivers who get open and make plays and a RB who can catch the ball and  punish a defense that puts five or six defensive backs on the field.  Rudolph isn’t great, but he’s got all those things and as a result, he looks pretty damn good.  Allen has none of those things because the Bills are clueless when it comes to offensive football, and it’s going to be their undoing.

Edited by mannc
Posted
2 minutes ago, mannc said:

No, it’s not. That’s a cliche, and it’s just not true.
 

 

The hell it isn't.

 

No QB, no win.  It really is that simple.  If you take that to mean that's all it takes then you aren't thinking hard enough.

Posted
51 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Makes no sense. If they were going to win 1 game, this was it. They play cincy later this year and could lose to them instead to make it at least even if they both lose all other games. By beating the Steelers, it boosts the 1st rd pick they own from them. This was the 1 game on their schedule to win. 

 

You know those Dolphins.....so proud of perfect records! 

Posted
41 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

That's pretty dopey.

We're not even averaging 20 points per game. It's ok bring it up. 

36 minutes ago, ALF said:

Miami traded Minkah Fitzpatrick who had 2 ints , and traded their LT Tunsil , Fitz and Rosen don't have a chance.

For a team with so little talent left, they trade Drake too. Hey, if you're going to tank, go all out. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Cripple Creek said:

The hell it isn't.

 

No QB, no win.  It really is that simple.  If you take that to mean that's all it takes then you aren't thinking hard enough.

So in your mind the phrase “it’s all about the QB” does not suggest that that’s all it takes? ?

Posted
Just now, mannc said:

So in your mind the phrase “it’s all about the QB” does not suggest that that’s all it takes? ?

Common man, are you really that dense?

 

No QB no sustained success. Do you really not understand this?  Do you really believe that when someone says "It's all about the QB they are ignoring the other 21 offensive and defensive positions?

 

Do you really believe that or are you just in an argumentative mood?

×
×
  • Create New...