Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, 32ABBA said:

I have been wondering why Allen hasn't been getting attention for this. I never hear it mentioned by radio or TV guys.

 

Allen is great in the clutch.

 

Everyone will know soon enough.

 

 

 

 

 

Because they are still holding out hope they can defend their pre draft tear down of him. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Offside#76FredSmerlas said:

This is a false positive.  If he was playing well throughout the game he wouldn't have to make a comeback.  The Bills defense is to good and we shouldn't have to continue coming back from deficits.  I'm not knocking him, love this kid in only his 2nd year and I'm glad he has steal nerves to be able to put his mistakes behind him.  Just hope he continues to progress so that he is ready to start burrying some of these teams. Love the attack style offense but Dabol could help him out with a few more runs during the game.

 

Yes. But it is a positive when you consider the alternative. The alternative being Josh continuing to struggle into the 4th quarter. Or even simply having nearly identical stats in the 4th quarter and overall but simply having one or two plays go sideways that prevent the team from winning the game.

 

I'll gladly take whatever "clutchness" Josh seems to have.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, billsbackto81 said:

Yeah, well has he had a 300 yard game yet?

Please allow me:


We wouldn’t have needed those 4th quarter comebacks if he didn’t suck and put us in that position in the first place!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, billsbackto81 said:

Ugh....

 

Guess I'll add this to my long list of posts where I should have written, "sarcasm included"...

 

Thought it was sarcasm when I read it initially. Then saw your vote in the poll and 2nd guessed the sarcasm.

 

Not that the 2 are conjoined at the hip.

 

Apologies.

8 hours ago, buffalo2218 said:

The problem with saying the Bills would have beat the Pats if Allen had finished is that by that standard, the Jets would have beat the Bills if Mosely hadn't got hurt. Idk if Allen would have been able to pull off the win or not

 

QB vs LB.

 

One guy touches the ball on every play he's on the field, the other does not.

 

I don't think that's an apt comparison at all.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

That would have been great, but I believe someone placed that Boston Herald article where both the snapper screwed up with a low snap, and the ST Coach not adjusting after a near miss against the Jets and the Giants with the Gunners adjusting in when there was max penetration planned was a huge miss.

 

I do think Allen could have pulled it off and Brady looked absolutely terrible in that game.

Posted

He helped create the reason we needed to come back.  The fact we were still in it and not down 33-0 like the Jets is a testament to our defense.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Offside#76FredSmerlas said:

This is a false positive.  If he was playing well throughout the game he wouldn't have to make a comeback.  The Bills defense is to good and we shouldn't have to continue coming back from deficits.  I'm not knocking him, love this kid in only his 2nd year and I'm glad he has steal nerves to be able to put his mistakes behind him.  Just hope he continues to progress so that he is ready to start burrying some of these teams. Love the attack style offense but Dabol could help him out with a few more runs during the game.

Do you think that if he didn't steal those nerves he might not have the runs during the game?

Posted
2 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

He helped create the reason we needed to come back.  The fact we were still in it and not down 33-0 like the Jets is a testament to our defense.

I agree, he did.Long as he can continue to make better decisions and not turn the ball over he will be fine. The last game his decision making was a lot better and hope it continues from here on out.

 

But yeah the D was huge but that's what we have come to expect from a MCD defense.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Patrick_Duffy said:

I agree, he did.Long as he can continue to make better decisions and not turn the ball over he will be fine. The last game his decision making was a lot better and hope it continues from here on out.

 

But yeah the D was huge but that's what we have come to expect from a MCD defense.

I felt a little bit better about Allen's performance after Darnold's horrendous performance against that defense (and Falk, Fitzy, Jones's, etc).  Hell, even Goff only put up three points against them in the Superbowl where he had a QBR of 16.4.  We'll see how Mayfield does this week.

Edited by Doc Brown
Posted
6 hours ago, K-9 said:

Please allow me:


We wouldn’t have needed those 4th quarter comebacks if he didn’t suck and put us in that position in the first place!

would you rather have a QB who plays efficiently all game only to poop his pants when it matters?  

 

Cause weve had those QBs.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, JOE IN HAMPTON ROADS said:

would you rather have a QB who plays efficiently all game only to poop his pants when it matters?  

 

Cause weve had those QBs.

Just in case it wasn’t obvious, I was being TOTALLY sarcastic in my post.

Posted
Just now, JOE IN HAMPTON ROADS said:

sorry man, there are so many haters … 

No worries. I’ve been around here so long, I just take it for granted people know my stance on things and that it’s obvious when I’m messing around. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, K-9 said:

No worries. I’ve been around here so long, I just take it for granted people know my stance on things and that it’s obvious when I’m messing around. 

it did seem out of character lol

  • 1 month later...
×
×
  • Create New...