Justice Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 manslaughter and false imprisonment. This guy (the defendant) should never had taken the stand. He convicted himself with his inconsistent testimony. To make a long story short. The defendant wanted sex from his wife and she didn't want to. She screamed for help and hollered for someone to call 911 while she was trying to leave her apartment. A witness verified that story. The husband then dragged his wife back into the house (False imprisonment) and then threw his wife on the floor. He then took both her legs and pushed them all the way to her head in the process breaking her neck and spine. She became a quadrapalegic instantly. He then proceeded to have sex with her while she was incapacitated. We didn't find him guilty of sexual battery because of lack of evidence. The victim died 16 months later due to complications from the trauma caused by her husband. 15 years is the maximum amount of time you can get for manslaughter and 5 years is the max for false imprisonment. They can be served simultaneously or separately. I believe he'll get the maximum sentence allowed by law because he is a four time felon prior to this conviction. One of them was for murder. The jury didn't know what his charges were during the trial, we only knew about his 4 felonies. Here's the worst part. This guy worked for the city for 20 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 His punishment should be the same as his victim's. Paralysis and then death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 His punishment should be the same as his victim's. Paralysis and then death. 300547[/snapback] You forgot one. Paralysis, gang bang by the prisoners, then death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 and there are people out there that would want to say that he has needs and should be forgiven .i like your way VABills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tux of Borg Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 C'mon, give the convicted felon a 5th chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 C'mon, give the convicted felon a 5th chance. 300555[/snapback] Friggen liberal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Ok, and this is where I think the story of the spammer getting 9 years in prison is ridiculous... This monster did these almost unspeakable acts, and the most he will get is 20 years. Yet a guy who sends you viagara ads that take you several seconds a day to delete gets just under half that time in jail? Wow... something is messed up there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kegtapr Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Good job. Thanks for performing your duty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Where is the applause smilie? Of course there are those who would just let this guy out to do it again, because they couldn't be bothered with jury duty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 His punishment should be the same as his victim's. Paralysis and then death. 300547[/snapback] You forgot one. Paralysis, gang bang by the prisoners, then death. 300549[/snapback] Could we make him into a pinata first? Let's do that. Then give him a Shiavo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Could we make him into a pinata first?Let's do that. Then give him a Shiavo. 300590[/snapback] Don't get me started on that. She didn't deserve what she got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Don't get me started on that. She didn't deserve what she got. 300592[/snapback] Agreed. Just a bit reactionary to the relativity of justice. Stevestojan's right too. If a slimeball neanderthal like this gets 20 for this, 9 years for a spammer is out of whack. Frankly I'd rather have the knuckledragger get 50 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kegtapr Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Stevestojan's right too. 300594[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 300596[/snapback] Don't worry it is blind squirral / nut type of stuff. You know million apes with typewritters in a warehouse (or is that whorehouse?) anyhow one of them is bound to accidentally write something coherent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted April 9, 2005 Author Share Posted April 9, 2005 You forgot one. Paralysis, gang bang by the prisoners, then death. 300549[/snapback] I totally disagree. Gang bang by prisoners first. So he can feel it. Paralysis. Then death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 I totally disagree. Gang bang by prisoners first. So he can feel it. Paralysis. Then death. 300599[/snapback] Maybe we can get Ron Mexico to participate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted April 9, 2005 Author Share Posted April 9, 2005 There were jurors who thought this guy is innocent. I had to fight and plead my case and make us deliberate another day just to get the conviction we got. Our very first vote was 10 not guilty & 2 for guilty. I was besides myself. After hours and hours of talking it out, I finally put some sense into these peoples' head. I'm still mad. I wanted murder in the first, kidnapping and sexual battery. BTW. For all of you talking about the 9 year term for spamming. The defendant was offered 10 years by the state in a plea bargain to avoid a trial. 10 years for all that he did and 9 years for spam? Yeah, that sounds fair. BTW #2. The defendant's testimony went something like this. "I asked my wife if she was okay" (hours after she accidentally fell and broke her back and couldn't move a limb), and her response was "no, that's okay, I'm allright" WTF???!!!!! This guy is a complete idiot if he thinks anybody can believe that crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Tate Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 She screamed for help and hollered for someone to call 911 while she was trying to leave her apartment. A witness verified that story. Nice neighbors. Boy, I'd like to help you out, but three buttons is asking too much. Maybe if emergency was only '91', or just '9' I could see it. I hope I never get on a jury like that. I might be facing an assault charge myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 and there are people out there that would want to say that he has needs and should be forgiven .i like your way VABills 300554[/snapback] Yeah but, he was a Union guy. Teamster I believe. JK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generation ME Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 There were jurors who thought this guy is innocent. I had to fight and plead my case and make us deliberate another day just to get the conviction we got. Our very first vote was 10 not guilty & 2 for guilty. I was besides myself. After hours and hours of talking it out, I finally put some sense into these peoples' head. I'm still mad. I wanted murder in the first, kidnapping and sexual battery. BTW. For all of you talking about the 9 year term for spamming. The defendant was offered 10 years by the state in a plea bargain to avoid a trial. 10 years for all that he did and 9 years for spam? Yeah, that sounds fair. BTW #2. The defendant's testimony went something like this. "I asked my wife if she was okay" (hours after she accidentally fell and broke her back and couldn't move a limb), and her response was "no, that's okay, I'm allright" WTF???!!!!! This guy is a complete idiot if he thinks anybody can believe that crap. 300603[/snapback] The original vote was 10-2 not guilty and you convicted shortly after ? OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts