Virgil Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) Apparently he fumbled on a punt return against the Bucs and that was it for him. I know some were hoping we'd keep him on. I'd bring him back to the practice squad, but don't know how that eligibility works Edited October 17, 2019 by Virgil 1
Beast Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 What does he have to offer that we don't already have better of? 6 1
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Makes a lot of sense if he has PS eligibility. He is probably better than any other WR we have on the PS right now, and is a natural substitute if McKenzie were to get injured. 5
Lagoon Blues Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) I feel like over the last 10 to 15 years he is the kind of player that would have stayed on this roster and had a below average career. Seems good to not feel that way about our roster right now. Just my opinion though... Edited October 15, 2019 by Lagoon Blues 1
MJS Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Already have McKenzie. That's the role he would fill. 1
CaptnCoke11 Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 He’s not a good football player. No need to bring him back 1
HOUSE Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Quote Good Luck to Ray Ray, could be back if there are any injuries
Mark80 Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 The guy is only good as a return guy. One problem...he can't catch a punt. Maybe some team will have a punt catcher who immediately hands it off to him after he catches it for him? Otherwise, this guy is useless. 1 1
NewEra Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 18 minutes ago, MJS said: Already have McKenzie. That's the role he would fill. And he’s a slug compared to mckenzie 2
Hapless Bills Fan Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 38 minutes ago, Virgil said: Apparently he fumbled on a punt return against the Bucs and that was it for him. I know some were hoping we'd keep him on. I'd bring him back to the practice squad, but don't know how that eligibility works He's eligible, but given that we cut him for his fumbling issues I don't know why we'd bring him back after he showed more of the same for another team. So I vote no way-way. That's all there is to say say 3 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Oh no no! Shouldn't that be nay nay? 4
whatdrought Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Still hard to believe some wanted him over McKenzie based solely on the "he's looked good in camp" reports. 1
Royale with Cheese Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 6 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: He's eligible, but given that we cut him for his fumbling issues I don't know why we'd bring him back after he showed more of the same for another team. So I vote no way-way. That's all there is to say say Shouldn't that be nay nay? Probably would make better sense sense.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 49 minutes ago, Virgil said: Apparently he fumbled on a punt return against the Bucs and that was it for him. I know some were hoping we'd keep him on. I'd bring him back to the practice squad, but don't know how that eligibility works So he’s in mid season form
GunnerBill Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 All he did on Sunday was drop punts. He isn't good.
Saxum Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 46 minutes ago, JR in Pittsburgh said: Makes a lot of sense if he has PS eligibility. He is probably better than any other WR we have on the PS right now, and is a natural substitute if McKenzie were to get injured. Natural fumbler? McKenzie has gotten better at not fumbling but still has issue. Not sure what else he would be natural for the Bills.
Boatdrinks Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Not surprised. I saw the fumble in that London game and figured he’d be toast. Some guys fumble their way out of the NFL ; it’s always been a quick ticket to the waiver wire.
Recommended Posts