B-Man Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 4 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Nope. Hasn’t broken any laws. Your position is what happens when people try to massage cherry-picked items, and omit relevant facts, in order to meet their desired outcomes. Quick reminder, this thread was completed with the first response. . 1
Albwan Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 14 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are the embarrassment of the USA trying to save a lawless president from justice. I guess you just see it all slipping away and feel That only through law breaking, extorting of foreign powers and massive amount of lies can this weak, ignorant movement of Trumps survive. Sad. Thank god we're talking about Trump and not Hilly. I say it every day - must be my cult chant. 1
Tiberius Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Just now, Albwan said: Thank god we're talking about Trump and not Hilly. I say it every day - must be my cult chant. Working out well for Democrats. Republicans are on the run, lost House already, Trump is under water politically and can't accomplish anything, elections are coming and things look good. Texas, Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina all trending toward the Dems and you guys are chained to the corpse of Trump. Enjoy!
B-Man Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 26 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Lol, when your explaining, you are losing 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I guess you just see it all slipping away and feel That only through law breaking, extorting of foreign powers and massive amount of lies can this weak, ignorant movement of Trumps survive. Keep in mind, he posted these two replies in a row................................clueless For the board........................you too can write your own Tibsy reply Simply take a few of the (DNC Approved) words and intersperse them in an incoherent sentence. Repeat, no matter what the reply said. Extra bonus if you can mis-state completely the premise you (Tibs) are replying to..................? law breaking, rule of law, criminal, whataboutism, extortion, lies, massive, cultists 3
Tiberius Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Keep in mind, he posted these two replies in a row................................clueless For the board........................you too can write your own Tibsy reply Simply take a few of the (DNC Approved) words and intersperse them in an incoherent sentence. Repeat, no matter what the reply said. Extra bonus if you can mis-state completely the premise you (Tibs) are replying to..................? law breaking, rule of law, criminal, whataboutism, extortion, lies, massive, cultists I got words! Trump is so corrupt only his cultists can love him. "I can shoot someone on fifth avenue and not lose any of my voters" he really knows you!
KRC Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: Keep in mind, he posted these two replies in a row................................clueless For the board........................you too can write your own Tibsy reply Simply take a few of the (DNC Approved) words and intersperse them in an incoherent sentence. Repeat, no matter what the reply said. Extra bonus if you can mis-state completely the premise you (Tibs) are replying to..................? law breaking, rule of law, criminal, whataboutism, extortion, lies, massive, cultists Is this like MadLibs, TOC version?
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 53 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Because the linked article is pure idiocy. It begs the question, and makes no distinction between "extortion" and "foreign policy." It’s also ignores multiple international treaties, and indirectly asserts that running for high office is a de facto shield against investigation into, and prosecution for, criminal acts. It’s literally an argument in favor of a second set of laws for the political class. 3
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 51 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Why should it do that? Most people understand the distinction without having to have it explained Go ahead. Explain it. 1
Rob's House Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 8 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: It’s also ignores multiple international treaties, and indirectly asserts that running for high office is a de facto shield against investigation into, and prosecution for, criminal acts. It’s literally an argument in favor of a second set of laws for the political class. It's worse than that. They're advocating for the judicial implementation of ex post facto laws. The definition of extortion is “the extraction of anything of value from another person by threatening or placing that person in fear of injury to any person or kidnapping of any person.” This bozo is seriously arguing that President Trump threatened the Ukrainian President with injury as it pertains to the statute. Forgetting Trump, or politicians generally for a moment, that is a terrifying precedent. It means if someone with power doesn't like you, they can redefine words to convict you of felonies for acts that are not criminal, were never considered criminal, and we're not contemplated by the statute under which they are being charged. 2 1
Tiberius Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 33 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Go ahead. Explain it. Those no need to.
SoCal Deek Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 The problem with this is that the basic premise is flat out WRONG! Trump didn’t ask anyone to dig up dirt on anyone. He requested that the Ukrainian government not stonewall a legitimate inquiry by the US Attorney General! He didn’t ask them for a favor to lie or fabricate anything. Geez people...read the transcript! It’ll take you less than five minutes. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 49 minutes ago, Rob's House said: It's worse than that. They're advocating for the judicial implementation of ex post facto laws. The definition of extortion is “the extraction of anything of value from another person by threatening or placing that person in fear of injury to any person or kidnapping of any person.” This bozo is seriously arguing that President Trump threatened the Ukrainian President with injury as it pertains to the statute. Forgetting Trump, or politicians generally for a moment, that is a terrifying precedent. It means if someone with power doesn't like you, they can redefine words to convict you of felonies for acts that are not criminal, were never considered criminal, and we're not contemplated by the statute under which they are being charged. You just described the progressive dream. That's the future they, and their useful idiots, are clamoring for. Why else is there a war on language? Why else equate speech with violence? Why else elevate feelings above rationality? They want control -- and the ability to keep said control for a long, long, time. Our democratic republic be damned. That's why they're losing. More people are seeing through the BS than are falling for it, despite the echo chambers in NYC, DC, and LA trying to pump the volume up to 11. 1 1
KD in CA Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Can someone just let me know when it's the 'beginning of the end' for Trump? 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, KD in CA said: Can someone just let me know when it's the 'beginning of the end' for Trump? Tibs told us it was 2017. Gary and his alts said 2017 as well. They've been wrong for two straight years. But wait until tomorrow... that's when it'll really begin to end!
ExiledInIllinois Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 5 hours ago, Tiberius said: So it's ok for a president to break the law now? Yes say the cultists Cultists and the broken hearted will always find a scapegoat to ease their pain of life. Blame it on "TDS." But... TDS also has many meanings that encompass both sides of the polarized country: Trump Defender/Delusional/Depression Syndrome No doubt people are Trump delusional, depressed defenders, and deranged, both sides... People who need Trump's marching orders have to find sanctuary somewhere, even if it's in the arms of a scandal laden presidency and wrong. It's easy for people to lose their moral compass. This is what a businessman brings to politics: Scandals & law breaking. Remember the ethics between the two, private business & public service: ~Private business is allowed do whatever the law does not forbid. ~Public service is allowed to do what only the law allows. There really is a difference between the two ethically. Why electing business people always ends this way... In scandal and law breaking. Ethically, government should not be run like a buisness. Our founders realized this. It took a while for our young country to figure it out... But I thought we squared it away in the 1920s & 30s with ethical reforms. /peace_out 3 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 The left can't meme. The left outlawed humor. The left has become so extreme in its positions that it's rendered parody obsolete. Want proof? Look above and see the co-opting of TDS by someone who struggles to put two coherent sentences together. Sucks to be a useful idiot for people who think you're chattel. 1 1
Tiberius Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The left can't meme. The left outlawed humor. The left has become so extreme in its positions that it's rendered parody obsolete. Want proof? Look above and see the co-opting of TDS by someone who struggles to put two coherent sentences together. Sucks to be a useful idiot for people who think you're chattel. Trump was talking about YOU when he said he could shoot someone in broad daylight. He wasn’t talking about the left. Your leader was right when when he said that and all regular people know that 1 1
KRC Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 12 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: This is what a businessman brings to politics: Scandals & law breaking. Sure. Because we didn't have that in government before Trump. 3
Tiberius Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Tibs told us it was 2017. Gary and his alts said 2017 as well. They've been wrong for two straight years. But wait until tomorrow... that's when it'll really begin to end! Still waiting for Obama and Comey to be arrested. Nunez memo anyone?
Recommended Posts