Kemp Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Note that the only arguments against this begin with "But what about...", never that it's not true. https://theintercept.com/2019/10/10/trump-crimes-law/ 5
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Nope. Hasn’t broken any laws. Your position is what happens when people try to massage cherry-picked items, and omit relevant facts, in order to meet their desired outcomes. 1 2
Westside Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 8 minutes ago, Kemp said: Note that the only arguments against this begin with "But what about...", never that it's not true. https://theintercept.com/2019/10/10/trump-crimes-law/ TDS much? 1 1
dubs Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 8 minutes ago, Kemp said: Note that the only arguments against this begin with "But what about...", never that it's not true. https://theintercept.com/2019/10/10/trump-crimes-law/ haha!
Foxx Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 dismantling my garden today, getting ready for winter. 2
3rdnlng Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 We put up with a lot of crap here at PPP but usually give people at least somewhat of a chance to spew their nonsense and give their reasons why for a certain position. You, on the other hand come down here and are intentionally dishonest. Every time. Fvck off. 3
Warren Zevon Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 28 minutes ago, Kemp said: Note that the only arguments against this begin with "But what about...", never that it's not true. https://theintercept.com/2019/10/10/trump-crimes-law/ Indeed - look at the Trump sycophants in this thread falling in line with their idol and attacking you 2
LB3 Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 17 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Indeed - look at the Trump sycophants in this thread falling in line with their idol and attacking you Gary, can I call you Gary? Thanks. Now listen up, @peaceout. Your shtick is old and tired. Do you ever self evaluate? Do you ever say to yourself, "My name is@Q-baby! and I may just have a troubling psychosis"? I think you'd find if you did some introspection, you'd be much happier. Be the best @McGee Return TD you can be. 2
Tiberius Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 So it's ok for a president to break the law now? Yes say the cultists 2 1
Warren Zevon Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 7 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Gary, can I call you Gary? Thanks. Now listen up, @peaceout. Your shtick is old and tired. Do you ever self evaluate? Do you ever say to yourself, "My name is@Q-baby! and I may just have a troubling psychosis"? I think you'd find if you did some introspection, you'd be much happier. Be the best @McGee Return TD you can be. nutjob says what? 1 1
Tiberius Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Democrats fighting for rule of law, Republicans trying to set a precedent to make the president above the law. 1
GG Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Funny how the term "allegedly" suddenly disappears from the lexicon. 5
Kemp Posted October 15, 2019 Author Posted October 15, 2019 So far, people have called me names and said nothing to refute the linked article. As predicted. It's difficult to defend the indefensible, so what else is left for the criminals. Alternative facts is the only available mantra for the evil and stupid 3 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 You could pretend you're a victim... Or, you know, you could look above and see someone refuting the framing of the article. But you're a dishonest guy, who does dishonest things. So of course you chose the former.
Rob's House Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 2 hours ago, Kemp said: Note that the only arguments against this begin with "But what about...", never that it's not true. https://theintercept.com/2019/10/10/trump-crimes-law/ So he's committed extortion as long as we completely redefine extortion? Cool story, bro. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Rob's House said: So he's committed extortion as long as we completely redefine extortion? Cool story, bro. Stop with the facts and common sense. Kemp is a victim, Rob! HAVE YOU NO SHAME?!
Azalin Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 23 minutes ago, Kemp said: So far, people have called me names and said nothing to refute the linked article. As predicted. It's difficult to defend the indefensible, so what else is left for the criminals. Alternative facts is the only available mantra for the evil and stupid Actually, I see two that both TYTT and GG have directly refuted the article and neither have called you names. Would you care to respond to them? 1
Rob's House Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Stop with the facts and common sense. Kemp is a victim, Rob! HAVE YOU NO SHAME?! Sorry. I try not to pick on the disabled, but sometimes I can't help it. 1
Tiberius Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Yes, all we need now is the Senate Republicans to give this law breaking the official stamp of angry approval. How dare the people challenge the great Caesar!?!
row_33 Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 it's that time of year when fruitflies enter the warm apartment, escaping the cold it's a minor inconvenience this time, one year the door open for the cat to sit out on the balcony and 10,000 flew in. so the vaccuum cleaner and a few apple cider vinegar and pineapple traps have been set out another sign that summer is over
Recommended Posts