Foxboro Mike Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 SG's NFL Preview Mike Mularkey -- I mean, I watch a ridiculous amount of football. Just an insane amount. And there wasn't one Steelers game over the past three years when I found myself saying, "Wow, I wonder who's coaching that offense; this is a clinic!" Early impressions?
PJBrown Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 Early impressions? 22238[/snapback] Don't you have your own team's board to troll?
Foxboro Mike Posted September 8, 2004 Author Posted September 8, 2004 Don't you have your own team's board to troll? 22246[/snapback] Witty!
Like A Mofo Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 Its from ESPN, the New England network.....next!
stuckincincy Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 Early impressions? 22238[/snapback] So many mirrors, so little time?... I'd chalk it up to the fact that a lot of good football folk aren't wordsmiths.
USMCBillsFan Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 Fug him. Pittsburgh doesn't have the talent that we have.
Foxboro Mike Posted September 8, 2004 Author Posted September 8, 2004 Fug him. Pittsburgh doesn't have the talent that we have. 22259[/snapback] I would vehemently disagree - as a matter of fact, I don't think they could be more SIMILAR. Bledsoe/Maddox is a wash at this stage of their careers. Henry/Staley - edge to Henry OL - Edge PIT WRs - Moulds/Reed v. Burress/Ward - Edge PIT Eerily similar, IMO.
PJBrown Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 Witty! 22249[/snapback] Original! By the way, I was just teasing......you at least bring up valid points most of the time though the Bledsoe crusade is getting a tad stale at times..... Anyway, I put little to no stock in that preview...the best offense this team can have is a solid, steady pound the ball and take a shot downfield on occasion..ie, "unspectacular"..... The thing I like about Mularky/Clements is that they have in the past been able to adapt their scheme/gameplan to the talent available.....and there wasn't much on the offensive side in Pitt the past year or two....
taterhill Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 I would vehemently disagree - as a matter of fact, I don't think they could be more SIMILAR. Bledsoe/Maddox is a wash at this stage of their careers. Henry/Staley - edge to Henry OL - Edge PIT WRs - Moulds/Reed v. Burress/Ward - Edge PIT Eerily similar, IMO. 22267[/snapback] thanks for your input, now turn around and grab my quarter pounder with extra pickles
34-78-83 Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 SG's NFL Preview Early impressions? 22238[/snapback] My early impression is that you like comedy in your daily sports read. Hopefully you don't obtain your "facts" from the same places....
PJBrown Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 Now, I was just giving you props and you had to post this..... I would vehemently disagree - as a matter of fact, I don't think they could be more SIMILAR. Bledsoe/Maddox is a wash at this stage of their careers. ****One bad year does not make a 4 time pro-bowler an Allstate Agent (what Maddox was and coincidently what I am)....Drew has lost a little, given, but Maddox=Bledsoe on fantasy island. Henry/Staley - edge to Henry ****True, but it's a HUGE edge....and we have a guy in McGahee getting back to form which adds another dimension OL - Edge PIT ****True, though lets see how just how big that gap is this year as our line gels.... True WRs - Moulds/Reed v. Burress/Ward - Edge PIT ****Maybe...of course a healthy molds and killing Gilbride's chuck and duck offense may change things.... Eerily similar, IMO. 22267[/snapback] **** At least we can all hate Miami!!!!!
Foxboro Mike Posted September 8, 2004 Author Posted September 8, 2004 Original! By the way, I was just teasing......you at least bring up valid points most of the time though the Bledsoe crusade is getting a tad stale at times.....Anyway, I put little to no stock in that preview...the best offense this team can have is a solid, steady pound the ball and take a shot downfield on occasion..ie, "unspectacular"..... The thing I like about Mularky/Clements is that they have in the past been able to adapt their scheme/gameplan to the talent available.....and there wasn't much on the offensive side in Pitt the past year or two.... 22288[/snapback] I haven't made a derogatory mention of the Cere... err, Drew in several weeks, although my self imposed ban of any criticism is up as soon as the first game is over.
PJBrown Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 I haven't made a derogatory mention of the Cere... err, Drew in several weeks, although my self imposed ban of any criticism is up as soon as the first game is over. 22325[/snapback] Lets make a friendly wager for the season if you're up for it......I am thinking that the Bills Offense, led by Bledsoe, is going to be good this year.....want to go by record, offensive rank or whatever?.....nothing crazy, something to make it interesting....up for it?
JinVA Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 Staley? 22375[/snapback] As in Duce, what don't you understand
bobblehead Posted September 8, 2004 Posted September 8, 2004 As in Duce, what don't you understand 22381[/snapback] Did Duce play under Mularkey?
Recommended Posts