Would you have taken 3-2 at the bye?

[benderbender]

Given the great early start the team has had, it’s easy to let the expectations skyrocket. And while I think even with Allen sitting we’re the better team, let’s say things don’t go well against the Titans. Would it really be that big of a let down? Before the start of the season, just based on the schedule alone, would you have been okay with a record of 3-2 at the bye?

Edited October 4, 2019 by benderbender
Grammar

[ShakAttack]

I would have taken 3-2 at the bye but not if coming off 2 straight losses. 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

I’ll take what they give me. What choice do we have? 

[Ethan in Cleveland]

3-2 is fine if the loss is Giants and Pats. It's not the end of the world but 3-2 with two AFC losses is not good. 

They need to go no less than 4-2 in the next 6 games. Anything less and they will struggle to make the playoffs with road games at Dallas and New England in the final 6.

[BringBackFlutie]

We will not be 3-2 at the bye, and I would not have been happy with it before the season started.

[Alphadawg7]

No will not be happy with 3-2, especially since it would mean we lost 2 in a row in the AFC, including against a Titan team who could be competition for a playoff spot late in the season.  

 

I had us at 4-1 before the season started. 

 

I also won’t freak out either, lot of football left.

Edited October 4, 2019 by Alphadawg7

[RiotAct]

no.  4-1 or bust.

[Chandler#81]

taken what? Multiple shots of whiskey?

Probably gonna Sunday afternoon..

[SlimShady'sSpaceForce]

Anything less than 16-0 was a failure 

 

[Another Fan]

15 minutes ago, BobBelcher said:

I would have taken 3-2 at the bye but not if coming off 2 straight losses. 

Good answer.  We'll see how Sunday goes 

[Virgil]

Before the season, yes.  Knowing our first 3 opponents were 0-9 and the Titans were 2-2 going in.....no.

[Tiffany980]

28 minutes ago, benderbender said:

Given the great early start the team has had, it’s easy to let the expectations skyrocket. And while I think even with Allen sitting we’re the better team, let’s say things don’t go well against the Titans. Would it really be that big of a let down? Before the start of the season, just based on the schedule alone, would you have been okay with a record of 3-2 at the bye?

Allen is the weakest link on your team. He's a turnover machine and looks incapable of changing...

[Dopey]

Sure, but that ain't happening.

4-1 baby!!

[Bangarang]

If we don’t win on Sunday then I refuse to watch our game next week.

Edited October 4, 2019 by Bangarang

[Rob's House]

6 minutes ago, Tiffany980 said:

Allen is the weakest link on your team. He's a turnover machine and looks incapable of changing...

Would you say he's kind of a bildo?

[offyourocker]

11 minutes ago, Tiffany980 said:

Allen is the weakest link on your team. He's a turnover machine and looks incapable of changing...

 

 

I am not sure if this is sarcasm or not.  If not, it is ridiculous.  The kid has the equivalent of one season under his belt.  He is showing improvement in many tangibles.  Check some of the stats of all time greats in their second year.  I hate this kind of attitude giving up on a player so fast.  Don’t call yourself a Bills fan. 

[Augie]

I’m sticking to 5-0.

 

I’m often disappointed. 

[PromoTheRobot]

No. I thought 4-1 was achievable.

[nedboy7]

6 minutes ago, offyourocker said:

 

 

I am not sure if this is sarcasm or not.  If not, it is ridiculous.  The kid has the equivalent of one season under his belt.  He is showing improvement in many tangibles.  Check some of the stats of all time greats in their second year.  I hate this kind of attitude giving up on a player so fast.  Don’t call yourself a Bills fan. 

 

You fell right into her web......

[Bferra13]

Get this weak ass defeatist crap outta here.

Edited October 4, 2019 by Bferra13