london_bills Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 25 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Allen's numbers will take huge drop in the 2nd half of the season because he faces better defenses. He's going to have to be a lot better. Yeah I wanna see how he's does against teams like the cowboys, ravens, steelers, pats
Hapless Bills Fan Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said: Fans need to remember Allen criticism is constructive criticism, at least from me. There is obvious talent both physically and mentally to develop. Long way to go though. Curious - how is "Allen's numbers will take huge drop in the 2nd half of the season because he faces better defenses." constructive criticism? It seems like a negative projected outlook to me. Likewise how is a statement like "My bank account goes from $1 to $2 am I rich? According to you I must be. I mean look at the improvement. 100% improvement." constructive? It seems like a flawed analogy. If a QB's completion percentage takes an 8% jump from his first to his second year, that's actually quite impressive, especially since it includes two games where he played badly against tough defenses. How is analogizing it to $2 in your bank account constructive? I could continue, but I guess my point is if you honestly believe your criticism of Allen is constructive you might want to look at what that means to you.
DCofNC Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 2 hours ago, GunnerBill said: Every way? What about redzone TD % where the Bills lead the league? And where do they rank in scoring?
Buffalo_Stampede Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 Just now, Hapless Bills Fan said: Curious - how is "Allen's numbers will take huge drop in the 2nd half of the season because he faces better defenses." constructive criticism? It seems like a negative projected outlook to me. Likewise how is a statement like "My bank account goes from $1 to $2 am I rich? According to you I must be. I mean look at the improvement. 100% improvement." constructive? It seems like a flawed analogy. If a QB's completion percentage takes an 8% jump from his first to his second year, that's actually quite impressive, especially since it includes two games where he played badly against tough defenses. How is analogizing it to $2 in your bank account constructive? I could continue, but I guess my point is if you honestly believe your criticism of Allen is constructive you might want to look at what that means to you. Comparing Allen to Allen is pointless. Allen is not the standard. 1 minute ago, DCofNC said: And where do they rank in scoring? Because they're near the bottom of the league in redzone appearances.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Comparing Allen to Allen is pointless. Allen is not the standard. You didn't answer my question. You assert that any Allen criticism from you is constructive. I asked you how are the quoted things constructive? Original post italicized below. If you want to compare Allen to someone else vs himself, fine, but you still need to explain how the $1 to $2 analogy is constructive. Curious - how is "Allen's numbers will take huge drop in the 2nd half of the season because he faces better defenses." constructive criticism? It seems like a negative projected outlook to me. Likewise how is a statement like "My bank account goes from $1 to $2 am I rich? According to you I must be. I mean look at the improvement. 100% improvement." constructive? It seems like a flawed analogy. If a QB's completion percentage takes an 8% jump from his first to his second year, that's actually quite impressive, especially since it includes two games where he played badly against tough defenses. How is analogizing it to $2 in your bank account constructive? I could continue, but I guess my point is if you honestly believe your criticism of Allen is constructive you might want to look at what that means to you.
Buffalo_Stampede Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: You didn't answer my question. You assert that any Allen criticism from you is constructive. I asked you how are the quoted things constructive? Original post italicized below. Curious - how is "Allen's numbers will take huge drop in the 2nd half of the season because he faces better defenses." constructive criticism? It seems like a negative projected outlook to me. Likewise how is a statement like "My bank account goes from $1 to $2 am I rich? According to you I must be. I mean look at the improvement. 100% improvement." constructive? It seems like a flawed analogy. If a QB's completion percentage takes an 8% jump from his first to his second year, that's actually quite impressive, especially since it includes two games where he played badly against tough defenses. How is analogizing it to $2 in your bank account constructive? I could continue, but I guess my point is if you honestly believe your criticism of Allen is constructive you might want to look at what that means to you. Saying his numbers will drop is a prediction. His numbers aren't good when compared to the league but I fear they will regress.
Billsfan1972 Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 59 minutes ago, pop gun said: Let me guess you part of the group that thinks because he hasn't thrown for 300 yards yet he sucks, amiright? No I think the OC & coaching staff have no idea how the game is played in 2019, have terrible, schemes, playcalling & philosophy along with have training wheels on Allen like he is a 6th round rookie draft pick playing only because your starter & back-up are injured (i.e. Pittsburgh). It's time to have Allen (and the offense) go out and score 35 points & play 4 quarters & not play the game between the 20's and expect the defense (or missed fgs) to win a game 14-7. The Bills need to see what they have in Allen long term and quit playing like this is the 70's. 1 1
Hapless Bills Fan Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said: Saying his numbers will drop is a prediction. His numbers aren't good when compared to the league but I fear they will regress. "huge drop" Not "I fear because..." but "will" Nothing about why you believe that to be the case. How is that constructive? We see a lot of over the top criticism here, I'm just curious when I see someone defending it as "constructive". I don't think you know what that means. 1
oldmanfan Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 Just now, Billsfan1972 said: No I think the OC & coaching staff have no idea how the game is played in 2019, have terrible, schemes, playcalling & philosophy along with have training wheels on Allen like he is a 6th round rookie draft pick playing only because your starter & back-up are injured (i.e. Pittsburgh). It's time to have Allen (and the offense) go out and score 35 points & play 4 quarters & not play the game between the 20's and expect the defense (or missed fgs) to win a game 14-7. The Bills need to see what they have in Allen long term and quit playing like this is the 70's. All right. This is getting tiring. I'll ask this question. If your team is playing a defense that struggles against the run, should you run the ball to win? Or be stubborn and pass the ball just to gain a certain number of passing yards? You are like a dog with a bone that can't let go. Teams need to do what they need to do to win games. You have said repeatedly you're more wanting to be entertained than to win. The perhaps instead of watching games on Sundays you should go to the movies.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Billsfan1972 said: No I think the OC & coaching staff have no idea how the game is played in 2019, have terrible, schemes, playcalling & philosophy along with have training wheels on Allen like he is a 6th round rookie draft pick playing only because your starter & back-up are injured (i.e. Pittsburgh). It's time to have Allen (and the offense) go out and score 35 points & play 4 quarters & not play the game between the 20's and expect the defense (or missed fgs) to win a game 14-7. The Bills need to see what they have in Allen long term and quit playing like this is the 70's. Actually I think the opposite is true and is part of what we're seeing. I think they don't have a limited play sheet and aren't designing "training wheels" plays for Allen. I think Daboll is expecting him to manage the play calls, route variations, and OL protection calls for a very very complicated offense, one John Brown referenced as "the most complicated I've played in". I think that's part of the problem. 3
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 35 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Allen's numbers will take huge drop in the 2nd half of the season because he faces better defenses. He's going to have to be a lot better. Pray tell. Which of these have a "better" defenses? Buffalo's Total Defense Stats - All NFL - Total Yards ranks #3. Buffalo's Total Defense Stats - All NFL - Points Per Game ranks #3. The following teams in bold are in the top 10 in most categories. REMAINING OPPONENTS: at Browns (2-6), at Dolphins (1-7), vs. Broncos (3-6), at Cowboys (5-3), vs. Ravens (6-2), at Steelers (4-4), at Patriots (8-1), vs. Jets (1-7) Homework Grade - D minus. Report Grade - F for failure to do research. The Cowboys lost to the JETS. They played poorly until a black cat wandered onto the field and offset the Giants lead. The Ravens will be a tough game (NOW there is a QB you should be bitching about)
GunnerBill Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 19 minutes ago, DCofNC said: And where do they rank in scoring? 22nd I believe. But the point was you can't say the offense is awful at everything when it leads the league in redzone TD %.
Teddy KGB Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 56 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Allen's numbers will take huge drop in the 2nd half of the season because he faces better defenses. Hey look it’s a bunch of ?????
Billsfan1972 Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 11 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Actually I think the opposite is true and is part of what we're seeing. I think they don't have a limited play sheet and aren't designing "training wheels" plays for Allen. I think Daboll is expecting him to manage the play calls, route variations, and OL protection calls for a very very complicated offense, one John Brown referenced as "the most complicated I've played in". I think that's part of the problem. 20 passes a game & under 200 yards with his highest total through 19 games of 253 tells me they are not doing a good job with him. Daboll (along with McD's coaching philosophy) is the problem imo (or so I hope).
Gugny Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: My bank account goes from $1 to $2 am I rich? According to you I must be. I mean look at the improvement. 100% improvement. I'm not sure which bank you use, but you're probably looking at some sort of penalty fee for not meeting the minimum balance. 1
Hapless Bills Fan Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 Just now, Billsfan1972 said: 20 passes a game & under 200 yards with his highest total through 19 games of 253 tells me they are not doing a good job with him. Daboll (along with McD's coaching philosophy) is the problem imo (or so I hope). I think the problem is that Allen is having to "Think!". He's got it through his head that this is the NFL, the DBs are faster and more athletic and he can't just sling it all over the field, he has to know what he's really seeing from the defense. That slows him down and sometimes the window closes before he decides. I believe it would help Allen's numbers now if Daboll were running a simpler offense where there were less for everyone to process, but then when complexity got added we might be in the same place because at some point the pattern recognition would have to advance. Either Allen will get it, or he won't. Tyrod never did. Fitz is spotty - he pulls the trigger fast, but he can be fooled (why he throws so many picks at times). Look at how Romo was as a TV announcer before they reined him in. He would see a pattern pre snap or a shift and be instantly yelling about what the D was and what play the O should run. Do you think he was like that his 2nd year? Pattern recognition is something that takes time to develop.
DuckyBoys Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 People have unrealistic expectations. This year is about Josh learning to protect the football and play situational football. Dont throw dumb picks on 1st and 2nd down. Learn to take a sack or throw the ball away if need be. Next year they go out and get a true physical #1 wr to open up John Brown more and slide all the wrs down one peg where they should be. Oh and along the way we have 6 wins and a great shot at playoffs. I'd consider 2019 a massive success so far. With the schedule they have there will be some games where he will have to put it up 40 times and we can revisit if he has gotten better with the offense on his back. 1 1
Buffalo_Stampede Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: I think the problem is that Allen is having to "Think!". He's got it through his head that this is the NFL, the DBs are faster and more athletic and he can't just sling it all over the field, he has to know what he's really seeing from the defense. That slows him down and sometimes the window closes before he decides. I believe it would help Allen's numbers now if Daboll were running a simpler offense where there were less for everyone to process, but then when complexity got added we might be in the same place because at some point the pattern recognition would have to advance. Either Allen will get it, or he won't. Tyrod never did. Fitz is spotty - he pulls the trigger fast, but he can be fooled (why he throws so many picks at times). Look at how Romo was as a TV announcer before they reined him in. He would see a pattern pre snap or a shift and be instantly yelling about what the D was and what play the O should run. Do you think he was like that his 2nd year? Pattern recognition is something that takes time to develop. Watch Mason Rudolph. The Steelers basically have dumbed down that offense to a half field read offense. Allen has a lot on his plate. They ask him to be a franchise QB. It's all part of development IMO. The hope is the game slows down and he makes quicker reads. I have no issues with the offensive coaching. They are allowing Allen to develop.
Billsfan1972 Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 4 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: I think the problem is that Allen is having to "Think!". He's got it through his head that this is the NFL, the DBs are faster and more athletic and he can't just sling it all over the field, he has to know what he's really seeing from the defense. That slows him down and sometimes the window closes before he decides. I believe it would help Allen's numbers now if Daboll were running a simpler offense where there were less for everyone to process, but then when complexity got added we might be in the same place because at some point the pattern recognition would have to advance. Either Allen will get it, or he won't. Tyrod never did. Fitz is spotty - he pulls the trigger fast, but he can be fooled (why he throws so many picks at times). Look at how Romo was as a TV announcer before they reined him in. He would see a pattern pre snap or a shift and be instantly yelling about what the D was and what play the O should run. Do you think he was like that his 2nd year? Pattern recognition is something that takes time to develop. Not disagreeing, however over & over we see every other "okay" QB in the NFL able to put up 300 yards (yes a # recognized in all metrics) fairly early in their careers & Allen only has a few around 250...... This is all on Daboll & McD...... For all those preaching the Process & a 4-5 year plan, then the 7th pick and his viability is of paramount importance. Need to see what the Bills have at QB or back to the drawing board.
HappyDays Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Allen was dreadful as a rookie. I'm not going to compare Allen to Allen. If that's what you're doing you're doing it wrong. Really? I'm just looking for steady improvement. Every step of the way he has improved. From the beginning of his rookie year to after his injury. From the end of his rookie season to the beginning of this season. From week 4 to week 9 this season. Continual improvement at each stage. As long as he keeps improving I'm happy. If you're comparing him to other QBs you're doing it wrong. He wasn't expected to be a top 10 QB this early in his career. Edited November 5, 2019 by HappyDays
Recommended Posts