Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
  On 9/25/2019 at 5:09 PM, Mark80 said:

No one gets beat up over 1 or 2 bad plays a game more than Edmunds.  It's pretty funny to me.

 

As I say when people talk about Allen being inaccurate on a couple throws a game.  Every QB misses open passes and every MLB gets blocked out of play, over pursues a PA, and loses a RB / TE in coverage during a game.  Every.  Single.  One.

Expand  

 

So Zay Jones doesn't get beat up more for 1 or 2 bad plays a game? :rolleyes:

 

I get that you needed something to lead with but implying that Edmunds is heavily scrutinized here or in the media is absurd.

 

And the problem isn't the bad plays it's the lack of plays.     This defense is supposed to feature the MLB by putting him in position to make plays..........and he's just too often late to the action and subsequently isn't making them.   

Edited by BADOLBILZ
Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 6:41 PM, BADOLBILZ said:

 

So Zay Jones doesn't get beat up more for 1 or 2 bad plays a game? :rolleyes:

 

I get that you needed something to lead with but implying that Edmunds is heavily scrutinized here or in the media is absurd.

 

And the problem isn't the bad plays it's the lack of plays.     This defense is supposed to feature the MLB by putting him in position to make plays..........and he's just too often late to the action and subsequently isn't making them.   

Expand  

That is breathtakingly untrue. 

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 6:47 PM, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

That is breathtakingly untrue. 

Expand  

 

 

So gotta' ask........did you clutch your pearls when I left you breathless?

 

We all know about Kuechly but when you are done hyperventilating put the bag down and read this........Pedestrian Preston Brown leading the NFL in tackles in the McDefense in 2017..........it's real friendly to instinctive MLB's.

 

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 5:05 PM, PatsFanNH said:

Huh? thats more likely get themselves hurt..  and rather poor taste saying they teach that technique. 

Expand  

Check the video replays of Develin's running and blocking.  Ask Freddie Jackson about Spikes' hit.  

 

Coincidence?

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:07 PM, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

So gotta' ask........did you clutch your pearls when I left you breathless?

 

We all know about Kuechly but when you are done hyperventilating put the bag down and read this........Pedestrian Preston Brown leading the NFL in tackles in the McDefense in 2017..........it's real friendly to instinctive MLB's.

 

Expand  

 

 

The Bills were 29th in the league against the run that year.

 

The Bills are 8th against the run this year.

 

 

Maybe tackles by the MLB doesn't correlate 1 to 1 with the success of the defense. 

 

 

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:16 PM, elroy16 said:

 

 

The Bills were 29th in the league against the run that year.

 

The Bills are 8th against the run this year.

 

 

Maybe tackles by the MLB doesn't correlate 1 to 1 with the success of the defense. 

 

 

Expand  

How he did not understand how dumb that stat would make him look is beyond me. 

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:16 PM, elroy16 said:

 

 

The Bills were 29th in the league against the run that year.

 

The Bills are 8th against the run this year.

 

 

Maybe tackles by the MLB doesn't correlate 1 to 1 with the success of the defense. 

 

 

Expand  

Two stats are not correlated.  A bad rush defense would typically have safeties as lead tacklers. 

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:20 PM, GG said:

Two stats are not correlated.  A bad rush defense would typically have safeties as lead tacklers. 

Expand  

Typically, maybe. But the whole premise of this conversation from the Edmunds defenders is that MLB is evolving in the pass-first NFL.  Their ability as rush defenders is not as important; their assignments are different. It follows that total tackle numbers decrease. Edmunds has done a great job filling his holes and pushing defenders outside. When that happens, though, his tackle numbers go down. 

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:24 PM, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

Typically, maybe. But the whole premise of this conversation from the Edmunds defenders is that MLB is evolving in the pass-first NFL.  Their ability as rush defenders is not as important; their assignments are different. It follows that total tackle numbers decrease. Edmunds has done a great job filling his holes and pushing defenders outside. When that happens, though, his tackle numbers go down. 

Expand  

That's not what All22 shows, though.  So far, he's been a net liability vs the run. 

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:26 PM, GG said:

That's not what All22 shows, though.  So far, he's been a net liability vs the run. 

Expand  

 

 

They've faced two premier RB's and as a team have done very well.

 

If that's the worst they'll do with Edmunds at MLB, while continuing the have an elite pass defense, I fail to see the problem. 

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:28 PM, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

Did you see the link I posted above? I realize that is only one example, but that is exactly what the All22 shows. 

Expand  

Definition of net liability is that he's had more negative plays in the run game than positive.  It doesn't mean that's he's absolutely useless vs the run. 

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:29 PM, GG said:

Definition of net liability is that he's had more negative plays in the run game than positive.  It doesn't mean that's he's absolutely useless vs the run. 

Expand  

Hard disagree, and in the context of our top 6 defense (top 8 run defense), the overall statistical evidence is on my side. Those statistics alone indicate the rush defense is doing its job. That includes Edmunds. 

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:28 PM, elroy16 said:

 

 

They've faced two premier RB's and as a team have done very well.

 

If that's the worst they'll do with Edmunds at MLB, while continuing the have an elite pass defense, I fail to see the problem. 

Expand  

The point is that they can be a truly elite D by kicking Edmunds outside and having a true MLB

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:32 PM, GG said:

The point is that they can be a truly elite D by kicking Edmunds outside and having a true MLB

Expand  

They can also be a truly elite D when Tremaine settles down and the game is moving slow for him

 

He's like 20 ganes in and like 21 years old. When he's 25 he's gonna be one of the best Mikes in the world

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:32 PM, GG said:

The point is that they can be a truly elite D by kicking Edmunds outside and having a true MLB

Expand  

No way. No MLB they plug in is going to be nearly as effective in the pass game, where it reallllly matters. 

 

This would be foolish. This is the equivalent of having a run first offense in todays NFL. It is based on an outdated philosophy. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 7:34 PM, Buffalo716 said:

They can also be a truly elite D when Tremaine settles down and the game is moving slow for him

 

He's like 20 ganes in and like 21 years old. When he's 25 he's gonna be one of the best Mikes in the world

Expand  

 

  On 9/25/2019 at 7:31 PM, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

Hard disagree, and in the context of our top 6 defense (top 8 run defense), the overall statistical evidence is on my side. Those statistics alone indicate the rush defense is doing its job. That includes Edmunds. 

Expand  

 

There's not enough evidence of total run stopping domination given the opponents so far.   A dominant defense doesn't allow Andy Dalton to march up and down the field in the second half, nor let it into red zone range with a minute left in the game.  Edmunds would be a far greater assets as the totally disruptive OLB than a mismatched MLB learning his game.

 

Proof was Giants opening drive, and then the 2 score deficit changed the Giants' offense.  Compare that to Bengals who got back in the game by running the ball in 3Q.

 

Everyone is waiting for Edmunds' light to turn on, and that was hyped going into the season, and yet he's basically at the same spot he was last year.  So with Harry out for the year, we better pray that Star's and Edmunds' lights turn on very quickly.

Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 8:48 PM, GG said:

 

 

There's not enough evidence of total run stopping domination given the opponents so far.   A dominant defense doesn't allow Andy Dalton to march up and down the field in the second half, nor let it into red zone range with a minute left in the game.  Edmunds would be a far greater assets as the totally disruptive OLB than a mismatched MLB learning his game.

 

Proof was Giants opening drive, and then the 2 score deficit changed the Giants' offense.  Compare that to Bengals who got back in the game by running the ball in 3Q.

 

Everyone is waiting for Edmunds' light to turn on, and that was hyped going into the season, and yet he's basically at the same spot he was last year.  So with Harry out for the year, we better pray that Star's and Edmunds' lights turn on very quickly.

Expand  

The Bengals had 2 good drive the WHOLE GAME

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Yo I'll solve it...check out this hit while Milano revolves it...

 

Bills Bills Baby...

Too Bold too Bold...

Edited by matter2003
Posted
  On 9/25/2019 at 8:51 PM, Buffalo716 said:

The Bengals had 2 good drive the WHOLE GAME

 

 

Expand  

 

Do a deeper dive on Bengals' last 4 drives and you will see a lot of chinks in the Bills dominant D armor.  This is one of those instances where the stats are misleading.   Once Dalton got in the groove, the defense had a hard time forcing a stop on downs.

×
×
  • Create New...