Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

Just when I started liking you again......  

 

When they [posters] want to shoot the messenger for someone oversight and sort of lay the blame on me...  I have to fight to let it go ;)  

 

Maybe I am wrong because I don't want to credit a TIE as a win.  Its who I am. 

 

 

(Autism Rules)  We can always agree to disagree.  

Naw man  they will UNLEASH Zay Jones!!! 

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 

Zay actually had a TD last time we played the Pats but I do not understand sending him deep like they do. It never works.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, PaattMaann said:

 

I mean, sure...but he has been involved, hes been open a lot actually, Allen hasnt throw to him

The thing is we can look at film and argue “oh so and so is open over here.” He might have also been the 5th read. If your first two reads are open even for a smaller gain, you will typically make that play. You don’t have time to look at all reads then make decision which is optimal

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

 

When they [posters] want to shoot the messenger for someone oversight and sort of lay the blame on me...  I have to fight to let it go ;)  

 

Maybe I am wrong because I don't want to credit a TIE as a win.  Its who I am. 

 

 

 

 

"somebody needs to let them know the chiefs and lions are undefeated"... this is just a general statement. this is not shooting the messenger. not even close to laying blame... just a statement.

 

and you aren't wrong because you wont credit a tie as a win. you're right there. its not a win... its just not a loss. which means the lions havnt lost. which, in turn, means they are undefeated by definition.

 

it wasn't until you disputed an indisputable definition that any of that ridiculous back and forth started.... and now that I've tried to explain it one last time i'll go ahead and let it die.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Pats are generating a lot of sacks this year.  They may take a couple of deep shots, but this is not going to become a theme of the game. That is unless the OL just dominates. Not real confident of that.

Posted

Let me end this dumb debate now.......

 

The Chiefs have ZERO losses............. the Lions have ZERO losses.

 

Sounds like a battle of unbeatens to the simplest of minds.

 

 

 

There is your lesson for today. ?

Posted
1 hour ago, Stank_Nasty said:

somebody needs to let them know the chiefs and lions are undefeated

 

1 hour ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

Read it again...  the only matchup this weekend between two undefeated teams

 

 

It is a Head to Head game between two Undefeated Teams facing each other. 

 

No other Undefeated Team faces another Undefeated Team

 

 

(I don't write them, I just try to interpret them) 

 

1 hour ago, Stank_Nasty said:

uh ya.... the lions and chiefs are undefeated..... and are going head to head.... 

 

 

Not trying to pick on anybody here as at first I agreed with Stank_Nasty. I now find myself agreeing with SlimShady'sGhost as he is technically correct as far as the NFL is concerned. Under NFL tie breaking procedures there is a note:

 

Quote

NOTE: Tie games count as one-half win and one-half loss for both clubs.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, njbuff said:

Let me end this dumb debate now.......

 

The Chiefs have ZERO losses............. the Lions have ZERO losses.

 

Sounds like a battle of unbeatens to the simplest of minds.

 

 

 

There is your lesson for today. ?

Would be hilarious if it ends in a tie.

Posted
1 minute ago, RememberTheRockpile said:

 

 

 

Not trying to pick on anybody here as at first I agreed with Stank_Nasty. I now find myself agreeing with SlimShady'sGhost as he is technically correct as far as the NFL is concerned. Under NFL tie breaking procedures there is a note:

 

 

 

well now that's a real monkey wrench isn't it....

Posted
9 minutes ago, RememberTheRockpile said:

 

 

 

Not trying to pick on anybody here as at first I agreed with Stank_Nasty. I now find myself agreeing with SlimShady'sGhost as he is technically correct as far as the NFL is concerned. Under NFL tie breaking procedures there is a note:

 

 

 

 

OHHHHH SNAPPPPP!!!!!!!!!

 

SlimShadysGhost with the....wait for it....WIN!!!!!!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, the skycap said:

Field position will be key too. Bojorquez can't screw this up. 

 

Hopefully the Bills will move the ball up and down the field so they don't have to worry about punting. ?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, PaattMaann said:

 

OHHHHH SNAPPPPP!!!!!!!!!

 

SlimShadysGhost with the....wait for it....WIN!!!!!!

i'll give it to him. in a total backhanded manner. but i'll give it to him.... but lets be honest.... it was a complete shot in the dark. the dudes explanations were nothing like the real definition here.

 

and this doesn't change the fact that there is a zero in the loss column.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

i'll give it to him. in a total backhanded manner. but i'll give it to him.... but lets be honest.... it was a complete shot in the dark. the dudes explanations were nothing like the real definition here.

 

and this doesn't change the fact that there is a zero in the loss column.

 

oh I agree completely, I was arguing on your side for a couple exchanges lol...

Posted
1 minute ago, row_33 said:

last year a lot of people were convinced Derek Anderson was gonna put the hurt on the Pats....

 

 

I'd love to see even one post from last year to that effect.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...