Bills 2-0 are fools gold - Article

[freddyjj]

3 minutes ago, BobChalmers said:

I give you the "journalist" responsible for these insights...

 

Note how he scored 1 like and 3 retweets on his last attempt to influence...

 

 

Not to mention the mandatory West Coast hyphenated last name syndrome.

[GoBills808]

Honestly the only problem I have with his list is that the Niners should be in our category, other than that and the obvious lack of watching any 2019 Bills games he's not wrong on how he ranks the 2-0 teams imo

[berg1029]

15 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

Why do Bills fans get all worked up over this sort of thing?

 

Let the team prove everyone wrong, and enjoy the ride.

 

 

The reason people get worked up about it is the same reason that the players here tend to play with a chip on their shoulder

[DaBillsFanSince1973]

9 minutes ago, freddyjj said:

[Bobby Hooks]

Who? Cares?

Edited September 19, 2019 by Bobby Hooks

[whatdrought]

I am so damn thankful to have the opinion of this intellect who obviously thoroughly watched the games.

 

 

[ngbills]

Who cares and why should anyone feel differently? We are one of the 2-0 teams. Our 2-0 with close victories vs the Jets and Giants are the least impressive. We have yet to play a complete game. All winning these two shows me is that we are likely a 8-8 or better team. If we had lost either we would be looking like a sub.500 team. 

[mrags]

16 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

One of the reasons I felt confident betting the various over win totals that were available at the casino was because we have a pretty easy schedule.  We have some pretty lousy teams yet to come: Cincinnati, Miami (2X), Denver, Washington & possibly Pittsburgh.  That's 5-6 extra wins that should be added to the 1st 2 before we even get to some of the games that we're about 50-50 to win.  This is a 9-10 win team at worst.  

I don’t disagree that most of those games that you stated should be wins. But chances are we lose 1 or 2 of them by just laying a dud. However, we will probably win 1-2 that we shouldn’t have either. 

[stosh64]

36 minutes ago, Virgil said:

F this guy.  

 

Literally the only 2-0 team he took a crap on.  And when you read his reasoning, you can see he hasn’t actually paid attention to this seasons games.  It’s your basic generalist BS

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/nfl-2-0-team-rankings-from-contenders-pats-to-fools-gold-bills/ar-AAHwXzg?li=BBnbfcL

Consider the source.

Michael Middlehurst-Schwartz

[SlimShady'sSpaceForce]

30 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

Just keep winning...

thanks Dory 

 

[GG]

41 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

What’s the relevance of the other 5 Bills teams that started 2-0 and missed the playoffs? Any of those players or coaches still on the team?

 

We had the same reactions to criticism after all those other 2-0 starts?

 

Only one thing will fix it.  Keep winning.

[Malazan]

Why promote someone who you think wrote something stupid? They don't care if clicks come from people who hate the article. 

[Virgil]

38 minutes ago, Seasons1992 said:

 

@Virgil has the "syndrome" unlike anyone around here.......until we win regularly, he's allowed to shake in the corner.

 

It’s a very warm corner 

5 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

Why promote someone who you think wrote something stupid? They don't care if clicks come from people who hate the article. 

You’re not wrong.  I caved.  

 

It’s just frustrating what’s allowed to pass for as journalism 

[nedboy7]

I mean we are one loss to the bengals away from all the criticism being true!  Buckle up buffalo flakes!  

Edited September 19, 2019 by nedboy7

[ndirish1978]

42 minutes ago, freddyjj said:

 

Ok this dweeb is a SoCal native by birth and USC Grad. 

 

Creepy. They should cast him as the next Norman Bates. Dude looks like he watches people through holes in the wall.

[Peace Frog]

47 minutes ago, Dablitzkrieg said:

He has such a punchable face.

I don't know about punchable as much as desirable to unleash a stream of morning urine into after winning an asparagus eating contest the night before.  Just sayin'.

[Albany,n.y.]

21 minutes ago, GG said:

 

We had the same reactions to criticism after all those other 2-0 starts?

 

Only one thing will fix it.  Keep winning.

This reminds me of one of the funniest comments I heard about a winning team.  Back in 2000 the NY Giants had the NFC's best record.  Someone in the media called the Giants "the ugliest 1st seed since Martina Navratilova"  The Giants won the NFC, but lost to the Ravens in the Super Bowl.  

[JohnC]

1 hour ago, Virgil said:

F this guy.  

 

Literally the only 2-0 team he took a crap on.  And when you read his reasoning, you can see he hasn’t actually paid attention to this seasons games.  It’s your basic generalist BS

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/nfl-2-0-team-rankings-from-contenders-pats-to-fools-gold-bills/ar-AAHwXzg?li=BBnbfcL

The Bills were very fortunate to have beaten the Jets. We won because their kicker missed an extra point and a routine field goal attempt. Shortly after the game he was released. A win is a win and good luck is good luck. However, that was a game we should have lost. The next week the Bills handedly beat the Giants. They are not a good team. They were already a bad team even before entering the game with a very depleted receiving unit because of multiple injuries. 

 

I am not going to be bothered about anyone criticizing us for winning the first two games. We are 2-0 and hopefully will be 3-0 against the Bengals, another mediocre team. If we beat the Bengals and lose to the Pats in the next game I still won't be dissatisfied with a 3-1 start. I'm not worried about how others perceive the Bills. Why be so sensitive?

[Figster]

Articles like these only help the Bills keep flying under the radar where it appears McBeane and Co. prefer to fly.

 

Writer flys coach...

[CircleTheWagons99]

Just wait till you read the article on NFL.com about QB rankings.