TakeYouToTasker Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: it’s sad you care so much ? and nice job not answering my question. A bunch of whackos claiming a punishment for the coup plotters will come....but won’t explain who or what that means Rational individuals don’t make time for those who “engage” as you have. Why would anyone take the time to make a detailed explanation to a person whom has already dedicated themselves to wholesale rejection of new information which cuts across his preferred biases? Such a person isn’t worth trying to inform, as they’ve already told you they don’t value the information you can provide. I’ve gone ahead and humored you this once because you directly engaged a post I make in response to another poster; but please understand that you’ve already planted your flag and declared that you’re not worth my time. If you require an education, and decide to seek one in earnest: feel free to ask mea culpa, and I’ll likely honor it. Until such point, you and I are done, as you don’t offer me anything of value. Cheers. 3
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Posted October 2, 2019 19 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: There's hundreds of pages of people going on the record -- and providing evidence to support it. Really? Hundreds of pages of people? Ya know, that just sounds like it was cooked up in the fake news kitchen. 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Your hero! 10 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: That is how polite people with class refer to one another whether they are truly friends or not. And I'm not one bit surprised you don't understand that because you possess neither. And Nancy Pelosi will have a grilled chicken salad with a raspberry vinaigrette, and I'm a Chef. Polite people? Man are you a stupid sh it head!
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Rational individuals don’t make time for those who “engage” as you have. Why would anyone take the time to make a detailed explanation to a person whom has already dedicated themselves to wholesale rejection of new information which cuts across his preferred biases? Such a person isn’t worth trying to inform, as they’ve already told you they don’t value the information you can provide. I’ve gone ahead and humored you this once because you directly engaged a post I make in response to another poster; but please understand that you’ve already planted your flag and declared that you’re not worth my time. If you require an education, and decide to seek one in earnest: feel free to ask mea culpa, and I’ll likely honor it. Until such point, you and I are done, as you don’t offer me anything of value. Cheers. detailed explanation??? How about some names and “jail.” Whatever you just posted took more effort (I didn’t read it, seemed ramblish)
Chef Jim Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Polite people? Man are you a stupid sh it head! Oh yeah I completely messed that up. What I meant to say was mature people. I rarely call people names here but you, and many like you on the left here, for whatever reason, thrive on it. Why is that? I lived in the Bay area for nearly 9 years and boy is the left an angry lot.
Foxx Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: says someone who posts wayyyyyy more than me lol upps, wrong browser. Edited October 2, 2019 by Foxx 1
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Foxx said: upps, wrong browser. yes, people who disagree with your nonsense must actually be one person, because no way 2 people don't believe this nonsense. Great logic 1
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 2 hours ago, Chef Jim said: Refusal to answer a simple yes and no question and then resorting to name calling is not very becoming. Not surprising but unbecoming. When did you stop beating your wife? No one asked the question for information, just to be douchey.
B-Man Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 Ukraine? Impeachment? Trump Can Survive It All, Foreign Analysts Say New York Times, by Steven Erlanger Original Article BRUSSELS — This summer, just after he visited the White House for the second time, President Andrzej Duda of Poland held forth about how much he admired President Trump’s transactional style. “I must tell you that in this respect I find it very easy and good to cooperate with President Donald Trump,” Mr. Duda said in an interview in Warsaw. “Because he’s very down to earth, very concrete. He tells me what he wants, he asks me what he can get from us.” . 1
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 20 minutes ago, Rob's House said: Translation: Stop pointing to the evidence that proves I'm a left-wing shill. Translation: I will simply paint people's positions as black or white, and cannot both appreciate some actions by Trump and criticize others. At least DR liked your post. You little lovebirds.
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Posted October 2, 2019 30 minutes ago, Albwan said: tibs do you get paid by the account or per post You'd know better than anyone, because you are obviously just DRs other log in name. 10 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Oh yeah I completely messed that up. What I meant to say was mature people. I rarely call people names here but you, and many like you on the left here, for whatever reason, thrive on it. Why is that? I lived in the Bay area for nearly 9 years and boy is the left an angry lot. I just see you as a really dumb person
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: Did the Crowdstrike server and Joe Biden get mentioned at the same time? Which got mentioned first and in conjunction with "a favor"? If they weren't mentioned at the same time, how much conversation happened between the time they were individually brought up? So the Bidens were just "[an]other thing" following the first/second "favor" and not actually a "favor?" Is this some critical distinction between the "favor" and how he asked for an investigation of the Bidens? What is "is" 3rdnng?
B-Man Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 Third and Long. Ukraine: A Political Rerun by Cal Thomas Original Article Back when reruns were a staple of summer programming, television networks aired repeats of their programs, giving viewers another opportunity to see what they had already seen. Democratic politicians are now conducting their own version of reruns. (Snip) The New York Times reports the whistleblower is a CIA agent who was on loan to the White House. I have known several CIA agents and two directors of the CIA--George H.W. Bush and Porter Goss--and none were known for the kind of prose contained in the complaint. The document appears to have been written by a team of lawyers with a political objective, namely impeachment of the president.
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, John Adams said: So the Bidens were just "[an]other thing" following the first/second "favor" and not actually a "favor?" Is this some critical distinction between the "favor" and how he asked for an investigation of the Bidens? What is "is" 3rdnng? Dude its impossible to prove these people wrong since they won't ever acknowledge it. Back when I engaged these people more substantively, I proved 3rdnlng as wrong as can be and he would not concede it. It was nonsensical . I get trying, but still.
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: Dude its impossible to prove these people wrong since they won't ever acknowledge it. Back when I engaged these people more substantively, I proved 3rdnlng as wrong as can be and he would not concede it. It was nonsensical . I get trying, but still. I've been here a day or two. I know the morans.
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, John Adams said: I've been here a day or two. I know the morans. Some once in awhile will admit when they are wrong, but he is an especially bad one. I'm sure you do know, its pretty obvious. He also isn't as smart as some of the others so he cant follow some things which is frustrating. Edited October 2, 2019 by Crayola64
Westside Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Crayola64 said: Some once in awhile will admit when they are wrong, he is an especially bad one. I'm sure you do know, its pretty obvious. He also isn't as smart as some of the others so he cant follow some things which is frustrating. Isn't that cute! You're having a conversation with yourself!
3rdnlng Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: Dude its impossible to prove these people wrong since they won't ever acknowledge it. Back when I engaged these people more substantively, I proved 3rdnlng as wrong as can be and he would not concede it. It was nonsensical . I get trying, but still. Makingshit up, eh? You couldn't prove me wrong in court even if you had DNA evidence. a video and my confession. BTW, does the 3rd chair even get a microphone? 1
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 Just now, westside2 said: Isn't that cute! You're having a conversation with yourself! lol oh yea! Just now, 3rdnlng said: Makingshit up, eh? You couldn't prove me wrong in court even if you had DNA evidence. a video and my confession. BTW, does the 3rd chair even get a microphone? No, it was one of the main reasons I stopped engaging with substance with you all. I realized you all arent reasonable, but are a bunch of weird conspiracy losers.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 Offers nothing. Refuses to read. Demands a list of names (despite those names being available in the material he refuses to read). Then blames others for his failure to read. Why? Because Crayola isn't an honest person. He's not a serious person. He's an asshat. And a spectacular one at that
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Offers nothing. Refuses to read. Demands a list of names (despite those names being available in the material he refuses to read). Then blames others for his failure to read. Why? Because Crayola isn't an honest person. He's not a serious person. He's an asshat. And a spectacular one at that Teach me to be a SERIOUS PERSON!!!! You sound like a child
Recommended Posts