whatdrought Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: It is difficult to judge which PPP left leaning poster is more disappointed this morning. I'm going to have to with GB for his creation of hilariously unneeded thread. ? And here I am trying to keep track of which of them are actually the same... 1 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Mitt Romney is "deeply troubled" by the transcript per his aid. I wanna say something nice about Mitt as Mormons are some of the nicest collective of people I know (I spent a lot of years with a second residence in Utah), but I can't. I am more interested in why he doesn't use some of his millions on a spine. 1
LB3 Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: It is difficult to judge which PPP left leaning poster is more disappointed this morning. I'm going to have to with GB for his creation of hilariously unneeded thread. ? Between this thread and his takes in the old Josh Allen thread, I'd have to go with Jrober. 1 1
3rdnlng Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Mitt Romney is "deeply troubled" by the transcript per his aid. (Just proves how much of an op this all was) Mitt Romney has gone downhill faster than the Jamaican bobsled team. 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I wanna say something nice about Mitt as Mormons are some of the nicest collective of people I know (I spent a lot of years with a second residence in Utah), but I can't. I am more interested in why he doesn't use some of his millions on a spine. Harry Reid is/was/claims to be a Mormon. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Mitt Romney has gone downhill faster than the Jamaican bobsled team. His role was to be the next McCain. He just is too boring to be McCain. He's so dull he puts coffee to sleep. 1
whatdrought Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 Okay... Someone help me out here as I am new to this thing and not wanting to get much deeper than the knees... If, (and so far this seems unlikely) Trump did what the Dems. are accusing, and withheld aid or whatever in order to assert pressure over a Ukrainian investigation body, he was doing so following the precedent of Biden, who did the same thing and admitted it in front of hundreds of people? Also, what distinction is there between investigating a political opponent and a former Vice President? 1
3rdnlng Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: His role was to be the next McCain. He just is too boring to be McCain. He's so dull he puts coffee to sleep. 7 years ago I thought he might be a functional bureaucrat with some principles. Not anymore. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, whatdrought said: Okay... Someone help me out here as I am new to this thing and not wanting to get much deeper than the knees... If, (and so far this seems unlikely) Trump did what the Dems. are accusing, and withheld aid or whatever in order to assert pressure over a Ukrainian investigation body, he was doing so following the precedent of Biden, who did the same thing and admitted it in front of hundreds of people? Also, what distinction is there between investigating a political opponent and a former Vice President? Go one step further -- the big charge is that Trump pressured a foreign country to investigate his political opponent. That's exactly what Obama/Clinton did in 2016... in the Ukraine (And England, And New Zealand, And France, And Canada). The people who are outraged today spent the past three years COVERING UP that fact from 2016. So they're not hypocrites -- they're worse. 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: 7 years ago I thought he might be a functional bureaucrat with some principles. Not anymore. Many people felt that way. Hell, I felt that way about 44. Oops. 2
Tiberius Posted September 25, 2019 Author Posted September 25, 2019 So how total of an exoneration is the transcript? 100%?
whatdrought Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: So how total of an exoneration is the transcript? 100%? 4
3rdnlng Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: So how total of an exoneration is the transcript? 100%? You're like a mouse in that you can squeeze in through the smallest of holes.
Bob&Doug Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 43 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: <snip> CROWDSTRIKE CROWDSTRIKE CROWDSTRIKE That's what scares the hell out of Pelosi and Chuck more than anything. That's why they were trying to get ahead of this. Bye, Joe. Bye, Nancy. Bye, Hillary. Bye, Obama. Bye, Kerry. Bye, Crowdstrike. Bye, Fusion GPS/Glenn Simpson Bye, Dem majority in the House. This isn't the left shooting them in the foot -- they shot themselves in the face on cable news. A running coup against a sitting president launched by the IC and media is definitely not normal. We are in agreement there. "If that bastard wins, we'll all hang from nooses." LOL 3
Tiberius Posted September 25, 2019 Author Posted September 25, 2019 4 minutes ago, whatdrought said: You don't think it's wrong for Trump to extort a foreign power to go after an American citizen? 3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: You're like a mouse in that you can squeeze in through the smallest of holes. And you still eat my sh it
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 9 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said: Where there's smoke there's fire. Your house is burning. You've already inhaled a lot of smoke. Just get out while you can. You wrote that while looking into a mirror I trust. Because it's Joe Biden who's the most ***** here. By miles and miles. And he'll bring down a lot of people with him. His corruption in the Ukraine wasn't a one off -- it was one stop of many on his collection route. Bye, Joe! Hello landslide in 2020 for Trump. 1
John Adams Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 30 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The source is anonymous. We cannot question him. We cannot ask anything about him. Who is twisting to fit a narrative again? You're literally trying to have it both ways. Sorry, you're wrong. By any definition. Ratcliffe just now: "I keep hearing a bunch of excuses for why it (the transcript) doesn't say what they said it would say." Lots of excused for it, Mr. Ratcliffe. But only one reason: The media and left lied to the public. Again. You're a dingbat. You can't question him this very second. He's going to get questioned. Relax brother. I know you like the urgency of "tomorrow" and "It's all going to happen next week," but it won't be too much longer until we hear from him. The fact that you, DR with all your followers across the globe who copy and share your thoughts as you say, don't yet know is not something most of us are worried about. It's coming. Have a cup of coffee and by about the time you're done, his name will be out.
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 Just now, John Adams said: You're a dingbat. Nah. The dingbat is the guy trying to say the anonymous source isn't really anonymous.
Numark3 Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 Constantly pointing out there is no quid pro quo, direct evidence, etc. is dumb. It’s nice buzz words you can repeat.... Secondary and circumstantial evidence can be just as strong. indirect whistelblowers can be 100% credible Explicit Quid pro quo isn’t the only way to do what he is accused of doing. i haven’t thought about this scandal at all, but you all parroting these defenses show you really don’t know anything 1
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 Just now, Crayola64 said: i haven’t thought about this scandal at all, but you all parroting these defenses show you really don’t know anything Says the guy literally parroting the media while refusing to read the primary source material for themselves. You don't know what this story is really about because you've decided you're better off remaining ignorant rather than thinking for yourself. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf 2
whatdrought Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You don't think it's wrong for The President of the United States of America Trump to extort a foreign power to go after an American citizen? To speak with the President of Ukraine regarding the corrupt actions of the former Vice President of the United States - Actions that said VPOTUS admitted publicly, actions that involved extorting a foreign power in order to cover up the corrupt actions of his son and protect his son. No, I don't think that's wrong.
Recommended Posts