Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Gary Busey said:

 

All of this is 100% bull#### propaganda you've ingested from the likes of Tracy Beanz and John Solomon.

 

Until the whistleblower report is released it's 100% hear say. 

 

 

 

LOL..............

 

Transcript fails............................on to the (falsely named) Whistleblower.

 

Ahhhhh...............the smell of liberal desperation.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

 

LOL..............

 

Transcript fails............................on to the (falsely named) Whistleblower.

 

Ahhhhh...............the smell of liberal desperation.

 

 

 

 

Got to hand it to them... A transcript of a call isn't evidence -- but the testimony of a guy who wasn't on the call about the call is what we really need to see! :lol: 

 

They never learn. TDS has addled many a brain.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

The establishment IC just tried to run the SAME play they ran with Russia Collusion: Use a politically motivated, anonymous IC source who claims to have more information about a crime and a threat to the country than he/she actually does.

 

The source here isn't anonymous. Just unknown to you and me (so far). 

 

You often say things like this to fit your narrative. 

 

Posted
Just now, John Adams said:

 

The source here isn't anonymous. Just unknown to you and me (so far). 

 

The source IS anonymous to the public. That's a fact. Sorry you're having such a tough day. Tomorrow you'll get Trump. Don't worry. :lol: 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

 

LOL..............

 

Transcript fails............................on to the (falsely named) Whistleblower.

 

Ahhhhh...............the smell of liberal desperation.

 

 

 

 

Transcript didn't fail Beta Man - it's evidence 

Posted
10 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

You'd love for me to be a TDS nutjob. That makes your pea brain easily do black/white thinking. You see TRUMP and your heart swells with all the goodness it represents and you see DEMOCRAT and it's the orc army of evil. Life is not that simple. Lift some weights with your brain and break out of the black/white narrative. 

 

There is some smoke here. At the very least, we know that Trump withheld earmarked money, his attorney admitted he pressed Ukraine about Biden (he also denied it--Trump may throw Rudy under the bus soon--the guy is a mess), and Trump had two calls. What more we don't yet know. 

 

I suspect that the call will show him pressuring the Ukies to investigate [something...not sure if Biden will be mentioned by name], but not show the quid pro quo link of the money he withheld before the call and released when Congress got up his ass about it. 

 

The Dem impeachment is absurd and not warranted (yet, if ever). 

You walk backwards so well you might want to think about taking up hockey. You suspect a lot of things but it still won't change the fact that you're an arrogant ass.

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Got to hand it to them... A transcript of a call isn't evidence -- but the testimony of a guy who wasn't on the call about the call is what we really need to see! :lol: 

 

They never learn. TDS has addled many a brain.

 

Whistleblower Complaint is the central issue - call is a part of it, not the other way around as much as you'd like that to be the case.

 

How many Twitter impressions did you get this week?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, 3rdnlng said:

You walk backwards so well you might want to think about taking up hockey. You suspect a lot of things but it still won't change the fact that you're an arrogant ass.

 

He literally just tried to say a source which is anonymous to the public isn't really anonymous. He's full of it.

Posted

Look at this shift -- we just spent three years hearing how there's nothing more important than getting to the bottom of what happened in 2016, but if Trump tries: TREASON!

 

 

 

These people are making themselves look foolish. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

 

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He literally just tried to say a source which is anonymous to the public isn't really anonymous. He's full of it.

 

You're living in the moment of this inquiry Mr. Knee-jerk Twitterbot. We will all know who this is. You use "anonymous" like it's an "anonymous" news story. This person's identity is known by a lot of people right now in government and the media. They are working out a deal now to get him to testify. Just let the process run. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He literally just tried to say a source which is anonymous to the public isn't really anonymous. He's full of it.

I saw an old movie recently that reminded me of him.

multiplicity.jpg

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

All of this is 100% bull#### propaganda you've ingested from the likes of Tracy Beanz and John Solomon.

 

Until the whistleblower report is released it's 100% hear say. 

Usually it's heresy.

Posted

 

Schiff has spoken. 

 

Wonder if he's ever going to offer up to the public the evidence he had (which he said wasn't circumstantial) about Trump colluding with Russia. 

 

:lol: AOC's tweet is gold too.

1 minute ago, John Adams said:

 

 

You're living in the moment of this inquiry Mr. Knee-jerk Twitterbot. We will all know who this is. You use "anonymous" like it's an "anonymous" news story. This person's identity is known by a lot of people right now in government and the media. They are working out a deal now to get him to testify. Just let the process run. 

 

The source is anonymous. We cannot question him. We cannot ask anything about him. Who is twisting to fit a narrative again? You're literally trying to have it both ways. Sorry, you're wrong. By any definition.

 

Ratcliffe just now: "I keep hearing a bunch of excuses for why it (the transcript) doesn't say what they said it would say."

 

Lots of excused for it, Mr. Ratcliffe. But only one reason: The media and left lied to the public. 


Again. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Look at this shift -- we just spent three years hearing how there's nothing more important than getting to the bottom of what happened in 2016, but if Trump tries: TREASON!

 

 

 

These people are making themselves look foolish. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.


The words "crowdstrike" + "server" is what has them all wetting their panties. This is just throwing poop at the wall and hoping something saves them from what is coming down the pike.

The last gasp of a failed coup attempt, and now the writhing of the snake whose head is about to be chopped off. (I sincerely hope I am not wrong about what is to come in #twoweeks.) 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


The words "crowdstrike" + "server" is what has them all wetting their panties. This is just throwing poop at the wall and hoping something saves them from what is coming down the pike.

The last gasp of a failed coup attempt, and now the writhing of the snake whose head is about to be chopped off. (I sincerely hope I am not wrong about what is to come in #twoweeks.) 

 

 

100% 


And I have to say, I did not expect to see Crowdstrike in that transcript, and I was prepared to see a lot of crazy in there. The fact that the media is now talking about Crowdstrike again (and the fact that most on the left do not even know who/what Crowdstrike is let alone how integral to the plot in 2016 they were) is setting up the OIG report and Durham findings perfectly. 

 

Keeping them front and center in the minds of the public. 

 

Trump sits down soon with the Ukrainian president soon. That will be must watch TV. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

It is difficult to judge which PPP left leaning poster is more disappointed this morning.

 

I'm going to have to with GB for his creation of hilariously unneeded thread.

 

?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

The media and the other TDSers have taken the lead from the NY Times, who really know how to twist the issue for the sake of their agenda. They take unsubstantiated claims and put them on the front page. When proven wrong they make a note of it on page 23 or just ignore the contrary evidence. Down the road Adam Schiff or John Adams/Ben Franklin/Beginner's Mind will bring up what was said on page 1 as if page 23 never happened.

  • Like (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...