Whistleblower Has Been Backed Up By Multiple Witnesses

[Koko78]

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

All true. Or those in charge can just follow the law.

 

Would that be the same law that says the rumor-monger is not, in fact, a "whistleblower"?

[KRC]

24 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Would that be the same law that says the rumor-monger is not, in fact, a "whistleblower"?

 

No. Not that one. The other law.

[Koko78]

11 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

No. Not that one. The other law.

Oh, the other one?

 

Well... crap. Guess we'll just have to #IMPEACH now.

[Tiberius]

38 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Would that be the same law that says the rumor-monger is not, in fact, a "whistleblower"?

The inspector general agreed it was a serious and urgent matter. Trump appointed that IG, btw 

[Koko78]

13 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The inspector general agreed it was a serious and urgent matter. Trump appointed that IG, btw 

 

Well, that's nice.

 

Still doesn't mean the rumor-monger meets the legal definition of a "whistleblower".

[Tiberius]

10 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Well, that's nice.

 

Still doesn't mean the rumor-monger meets the legal definition of a "whistleblower".

Then Trump should stop violating the law and simply release the allegation. Either its a really bad accusation with proof, which explains why they are covering this up, or its nothing and Trump and crew are complete idiots for allowing this violation of the law to make them look really bad. 

 

If the truth will get out anyway, why cover this up? Makes no sense. 

 

 

[Warren Zevon]

"The letter was beautiful, it was a perfect letter" - Trump on his call with the Ukrainian President

 

Stable genius, indeed.

[Koko78]

23 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Then Trump should stop violating the law and simply release the allegation.

 

Identify the specific law he is "violating".

[Tiberius]

8 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Identify the specific law he is "violating".

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3033

[B-Man]

All the people who’ve been wrong about everything for the last three years are telling you Trump is in trouble with the Ukraine thing.

 

Please excuse me if I’m a little skeptical.

 

 

 

 

 

QUESTION ASKED: Did Joe Biden Implicate Barack Obama in Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Scandal?

 

Read the whole thing.

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

[Tiberius]

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

All the people who’ve been wrong about everything for the last three years are telling you Trump is in trouble with the Ukraine thing.

 

Please excuse me if I’m a little skeptical.

 

 

 

 

 

QUESTION ASKED: Did Joe Biden Implicate Barack Obama in Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Scandal?

 

Read the whole thing.

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

What happened to Hillary in all these scandals? Come on man, if you are going to spread fake news at least have Hillary in there sucking blood or killing innocents somehow. Gosh 

[John Adams]

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Now, now Albwan.  John A. is not "triggered", he is just one of those, all too common posters. 

 

The "I'm above it all" who visits once in a while to point out the many mistakes of all those posters below him.....................We are indeed fortunate that he dropped by.

.

 

You may someday be worthy of mockery, but to get there, you'd have to first stop being 26CopyPaste's little brother and speak for yourself. 

3 hours ago, Albwan said:

And yet, you're here reading it, getting triggered about it, and whining about it. 

tee hee

 

I have no idea who you are but welcome to PPP. 

[Capco]

42 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3033

 

(5)

(A)

An employee of an element of the intelligence community, an employee assigned or detailed to an element of the intelligence community, or an employee of a contractor to the intelligence community who intends to report to Congress a complaint or information with respect to an urgent concern may report such complaint or information to the Inspector General.

(B)

Not later than the end of the 14-calendar-day period beginning on the date of receipt from an employee of a complaint or information under subparagraph (A), the Inspector General shall determine whether the complaint or information appears credible. Upon making such a determination, the Inspector General shall transmit to the Director a notice of that determination, together with the complaint or information.

(C)

Upon receipt of a transmittal from the Inspector General under subparagraph (B), the Director shall, within 7 calendar days of such receipt, forward such transmittal to the congressional intelligence committees, together with any comments the Director considers appropriate.

(D)

(i)

If the Inspector General does not find credible under subparagraph (B) a complaint or information submitted under subparagraph (A), or does not transmit the complaint or information to the Director in accurate form under subparagraph (B), the employee (subject to clause (ii)) may submit the complaint or information to Congress by contacting either or both of the congressional intelligence committees directly.

(ii)An employee may contact the congressional intelligence committees directly as described in clause (i) only if the employee—

(I)

before making such a contact, furnishes to the Director, through the Inspector General, a statement of the employee’s complaint or information and notice of the employee’s intent to contact the congressional intelligence committees directly; and

(II)

obtains and follows from the Director, through the Inspector General, direction on how to contact the congressional intelligence committees in accordance with appropriate security practices.

(iii)

A member or employee of one of the congressional intelligence committees who receives a complaint or information under this subparagraph does so in that member or employee’s official capacity as a member or employee of such committee.

(E)

The Inspector General shall notify an employee who reports a complaint or information to the Inspector General under this paragraph of each action taken under this paragraph with respect to the complaint or information. Such notice shall be provided not later than 3 days after any such action is taken.

(F)

An action taken by the Director or the Inspector General under this paragraph shall not be subject to judicial review.

(G)In this paragraph, the term “urgent concern” means any of the following:

(i)

A serious or flagrant problem, abuse, violation of law or Executive order, or deficiency relating to the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity within the responsibility and authority of the Director of National Intelligence involving classified information, but does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters.

(ii)

A false statement to Congress, or a willful withholding from Congress, on an issue of material fact relating to the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity.

(iii)

An action, including a personnel action described in section 2302(a)(2)(A) of title 5, constituting reprisal or threat of reprisal prohibited under subsection (g)(3)(B) of this section in response to an employee’s reporting an urgent concern in accordance with this paragraph.

(H)

Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the protections afforded to an employee under section 3517(d) of this title or section 8H of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.).

(I)

An individual who has submitted a complaint or information to the Inspector General under this section may notify any member of either of the congressional intelligence committees, or a staff member of either of such committees, of the fact that such individual has made a submission to the Inspector General, and of the date on which such submission was made.

(6)

In accordance with section 535 of title 28, the Inspector General shall expeditiously report to the Attorney General any information, allegation, or complaint received by the Inspector General relating to violations of Federal criminal law that involves [1] a program or operation of an element of the intelligence community, or in the relationships between the elements of the intelligence community, consistent with such guidelines as may be issued by the Attorney General pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of such section. A copy of each such report shall be furnished to the Director.

[SoCal Deek]

Let me get this straight. It’s illegal for the President of the United States to inquire with a foreign leader about whether the next president (Biden) may be guilty of a crime, prior to him getting elected?  Isn’t that exactly what Obama was doing with Trump prior to his election? Doesn’t anyone see the irony in any of this? Sheeeesh!

[KRC]

8 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Let me get this straight. It’s illegal for the President of the United States to inquire with a foreign leader about whether the next president (Biden) may be guilty of a crime, prior to him getting elected?  Isn’t that exactly what Obama was doing with Trump prior to his election? Doesn’t anyone see the irony in any of this? Sheeeesh!

 

It's OK when they do it.

[Tiberius]

3 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

It's OK when they do it.

You are being cheated 

[KRC]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

You are being cheated 

 

True. They are not investigating Biden and his corruption. We finally agree on something.

[Tiberius]

Just now, KRC said:

 

True. They are not investigating Biden and his corruption. We finally agree on something.

You are always being cheated. Media is unfair. Government is unfair. Hollywood, unfair. Deep state is unfairLife unfair, 

 

Everything is unfair to Conservatives 

[KRC]

Just now, Tiberius said:

You are always being cheated. Media is unfair. Government is unfair. Hollywood, unfair. Deep state is unfairLife unfair, 

 

Everything is unfair to Conservatives 

 

So, we shouldn't investigate corruption, or only investigate corruption if it involves Republicans?

[Tiberius]

Just now, KRC said:

 

So, we shouldn't investigate corruption, or only investigate corruption if it involves Republicans?

This is stupid. Your guy has been caught red handed, that doesn't mean you get off by simply raising a false claim. 

 

So you lose. Maybe you should try going on a hunger strike. I'll support you