Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Me? I'm going to believe the transcript that your unimpeachable purple heart recipient war hero verified was accurate over cherry-picked out-of-context nonsense that you're trying to spew as fact.

 

However, just for fun, please show us where in the transcript was this "quid pro quo extortion", without omitting 500 plus words from that transcript.

 

Reminds me, have we seen a more complete transcript from the 7/25 call?   Recall the ellipses?   One would think that, as long as redacted for security reasons, a more complete transcript might add some more to the context.   Has there been any talk of releasing that?

Edited by Bob in Mich
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Gary M said:

Do we have a list of the people that were actually in the room and/or listening to the phone call?


There has been statements from the four translators that the call transcript is accurate (oops Schiffy), from everyone in the room that it is accurate (oopsie Schiffy), testimony in Congress from Vindman (oopsie Schiff) that the "release the whole testimony" is spin as the translations are what is released, not the original language (so whatever the Ukrainian guy spoke, only the translation is in there, same for the English Trump spoke being translated for the Ukrainian guy). It is why a 10 minute transcript is shown on a 30 minute call (I "think" it is 12 minutes and 31 minutes, but don't have the exact numbers at my fingertips).

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
cleaned up my post
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

You know who could clear this whole thing up?  President Trump should take the stand and tell us all, under oath to minimize his lying, what he was doing with Zelensky.

 

I would have thought the House Republicans would want to put him on the witness list so we can get to the bottom of this issue and get back to running the country.

 

More proof you're an idiot. 

18 minutes ago, Gary M said:

Do we have a list of the people that were actually in the room and/or listening to the phone call?

 

Well over a dozen. No complete list that I know of (and likely one would be classified due to the IC officers involved in the transcription). 

17 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Reminds me, have we seen a more complete transcript from the 7/25 call?   Recall the ellipses?   One would think that, as long as redacted for security reasons, a more complete transcript might add some more to the context.   Has there been any talk of releasing that?

 

More proof you're an idiot. 


And don't know how these call transcriptions are compiled. 

 

You should educate yourself before you run off spouting partisan talking points. It helps to prevent embarrassment. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

You know who could clear this whole thing up?  President Trump should take the stand and tell us all, under oath to minimize his lying, what he was doing with Zelensky.

and that would set a great precedent wouldn't it? All someone then has to do is make up some sh1t about the President, then demand they take the stand to refute it huh?

 

Or did you only intend this precedent to happen to Republican Presidents?

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Cinga said:

and that would set a great precedent wouldn't it? All someone then has to do is make up some sh1t about the President, then demand they take the stand to refute it huh?

 

Or did you only intend this precedent to happen to Republican Presidents?

 

Bob doesn't think two steps ahead. 

 

He doesn't think one step ahead. 

 

He takes what he's told (by the same media and political pundits who lied to him for three years about RUSSIA! and protected pedophiles) and blindly parrots it -- so long as it conforms to what he BELIEVES (not knows, can prove, or even what he understands -- just what he BELIEVES) to be truth. 

 

We're three posts away from him asking again for "surveillance tapes" while claiming that the absence of these "tapes" proves there was no illegal spying on Trump :lol: 

 

He's a moron.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

RUH-ROH

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/icig-complaint-ukraine-whistleblower

The complaint, which was filed last week and obtained by Fox News, alleged the donations from roughly 6,000 individuals "clearly constitute" gifts to a current intelligence official that may be restricted because of the employee's official position pursuant to 5 CFR 2635.203 and other statutes. To date, the GoFundMe has raised over $227,000.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Cinga said:

RUH-ROH

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/icig-complaint-ukraine-whistleblower

The complaint, which was filed last week and obtained by Fox News, alleged the donations from roughly 6,000 individuals "clearly constitute" gifts to a current intelligence official that may be restricted because of the employee's official position pursuant to 5 CFR 2635.203 and other statutes. To date, the GoFundMe has raised over $227,000.

 

Wait...the anonymous whistleblower, who's name the media can't even mention under pain of death, has a GoFundMe account????

 

What the ***** kind of anonymity is this?   :lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, DC Tom said:

 

Wait...the anonymous whistleblower, who's name the media can't even mention under pain of death, has a GoFundMe account????

 

What the ***** kind of anonymity is this?   :lol:


The kind where you launder money through gofundme. The left seems quite good at it.


 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
Just now, DC Tom said:

 

Wait...the anonymous whistleblower, who's name the media can't even mention under pain of death, has a GoFundMe account????

 

What the ***** kind of anonymity is this?   :lol:

 

Better -- why does he even need the money? Zaid has said he's repping him pro bono this whole time. Plus, as a whistleblower, he can't be fired. 

 

So what's the money for again? 

 

.... Riiiiight.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

Wait...the anonymous whistleblower, who's name the media can't even mention under pain of death, has a GoFundMe account????

 

What the ***** kind of anonymity is this?   :lol:

 

 

So. . . . . . . 

 

No thank you cards then ?

 

?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

WHISTLEBLOWER HAS A GOFUNDME ACCOUNT TO THE TUNE OF 227K TO DATE*

 

What pisses me off is the hubris displayed by the Left in all of their dirty, illegal doings. It is a gigantic insult to our intelligence for them to think we are too dumb to figure them out.

 

* Headline that will never be seen on the MSM.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Cinga said:

and that would set a great precedent wouldn't it? All someone then has to do is make up some sh1t about the President, then demand they take the stand to refute it huh?

 

Or did you only intend this precedent to happen to Republican Presidents?

 

Well, we all know he would ignore any subpeona.  If you notice though, I didn't say anybody demand anything. 

 

Trump knows the story.  He should just volunteer to take the stand.  Wouldn't it be helpful for him to just sit beside a nice fireplace and just explain it all in plain English?  I mean, just tell us all the truthful story so we can get on with Iran and prescription drug coverage and immigration.  Could all be over by tomorrow at noon.

Posted
4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

WHISTLEBLOWER HAS A GOFUNDME ACCOUNT TO THE TUNE OF 227K TO DATE*

 

What pisses me off is the hubris displayed by the Left in all of their dirty, illegal doings. It is a gigantic insult to our intelligence for them to think we are too dumb to figure them out.

 

* Headline that will never be seen on the MSM.

 

 

 

 

So? 

Posted

 

"Respect his feelings" is what his attorney actually said in a hearing. 

 

***** his feelings. 

 

 

1 minute ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Well, we all know he would ignore any subpeona.  If you notice though, I didn't say anybody demand anything. 

 

Trump knows the story.  He should just volunteer to take the stand.  Wouldn't it be helpful for him to just sit beside a nice fireplace and just explain it all in plain English?  I mean, just tell us all the truthful story so we can get on with Iran and prescription drug coverage and immigration.  Could all be over by tomorrow at noon.

 

Two posts away now from asking about "WHERE ARE THE TAPES!"

 

Bob doesn't care about setting poor precedents. 

 

Bob doesn't care about facts. 

 

He cares about "ORANGE MAN BAD BECAUSE THE PEDO PROTECTORS TOLD ME HE IS AND REEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!"

 

Don't be like Bob, be better than Bob.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

Delusional Rhino has a crush on Bob - it's weird

 

He just can't stop talking about him

He hates people that spread the truth 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...