Doc Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: Under oath? Nope Ask ambassador, ask Purple Heart recipient ask state department official Transcripts are available You think Zelensky's statement will change under oath? LOL! And funny how the Purple Heart recipient wasn't the original whistleblower, considering he was actually there. Makes you wonder... 3 hours ago, dubs said: according to reporting from John Solomon, Zelensky reopened the investigation into Burisma months before Trump and Zelensky even spoke. Interesting. 2
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 3 hours ago, Koko78 said: And yet you can't figure out why the Democrats lost in 2016, could not take the Senate in 2018, and are going to get thumped in 2020. Amazing. .....ain't happening....Tibs has 535 relatives running...............
B-Man Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 SEN. RAND PAUL CORRECTS REPORTER: It Is Not Illegal For Media To Name The Whistleblower. .
Doc Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 If this were a R whistleblower, he'd have been Doxxed weeks ago and no one in the MSM would have batted an eye. And The Hills got pwned there. 2 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 Just now, Doc said: If this were a R whistleblower, he'd have been Doxxed weeks ago and no one in the MSM would have batted an eye. And The Hills got pwned there. To be fair, his name has been out there in the independent and right leaning media for about 3 weeks. Maybe 2. Never "confirmed" though... The establishment media has ignored it, like they ignore most of what comes from those (good) journalists/sources/commentators. 1
Koko78 Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: To be fair, his name has been out there in the independent and right leaning media for about 3 weeks. Maybe 2. Never "confirmed" though... The establishment media has ignored it, like they ignore most of what comes from those (good) journalists/sources/commentators. Hey man, if it's not verified by at least 4 sources and an affidavit from God himself, it's just not up to the rigorous journalistic standards of the main stream media. Unless, of course, it's an unverified salacious smear on a Republican, then who cares, right? Nazis deserve to have their dirty laundry published! 3
B-Man Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 Retired Army Officer Remembers Lt. Col. Vindman as Partisan Democrat Who Ridiculed America by Debra Heine Original Article A retired Army officer who worked with Democrat “star witness” Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman in Grafenwoher, Germany, claims Vindman “really talked up” President Barack Obama and ridiculed America and Americans in front of Russian military officers. In an eye-opening thread on Twitter last week, retired U.S. Army Lt. Colonel Jim Hickman said that he “verbally reprimanded” Vindman after he heard some of his derisive remarks for himself. “Do not let the uniform fool you,” Hickman wrote. “He is a political activist in uniform.” Hickman’s former boss at the Joint Multinational Simulation Center in Grafenwoehr has since gone on the record to corroborate his story. . 3
row_33 Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 i'm reading the whistleblower worked for Joe Biden that can't be, that would be a severe conflict of interest.... 2
Tiberius Posted November 6, 2019 Author Posted November 6, 2019 11 minutes ago, B-Man said: Retired Army Officer Remembers Lt. Col. Vindman as Partisan Democrat Who Ridiculed America by Debra Heine Original Article A retired Army officer who worked with Democrat “star witness” Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman in Grafenwoher, Germany, claims Vindman “really talked up” President Barack Obama and ridiculed America and Americans in front of Russian military officers. In an eye-opening thread on Twitter last week, retired U.S. Army Lt. Colonel Jim Hickman said that he “verbally reprimanded” Vindman after he heard some of his derisive remarks for himself. “Do not let the uniform fool you,” Hickman wrote. “He is a political activist in uniform.” Hickman’s former boss at the Joint Multinational Simulation Center in Grafenwoehr has since gone on the record to corroborate his story. . But Sondland was Trumps appointee
B-Man Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 MATT MARGOLIS: No, Sondland’s Revised Testimony Doesn’t Prove There Was a Quid Pro Quo. What about Sondland’s testimony? According to his testimony, when he asked Trump what he wanted from Ukraine, Trump said, “I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing… to do what he ran on.” Also released today were transcripts of the testimony of Ambassador Kurt Volker, special envoy to Ukraine. According to his testimony, there was “no linkage” between a White House meeting with Trump and Zelenksy and any promises to hold any investigations. I think Spengler hit it closer to the marklast week: “For the record, I don’t care whether there was quid pro quo with Ukraine or not. If President Trump used military aid as a bargaining chip to persuade the government of Ukraine to investigate foreign subversion of our political system, he was doing his job as commander-in-chief to protect this country from its external enemies.” Although the word “external” was probably unnecessary.
Gary M Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 19 hours ago, IDBillzFan said: I want to suggest it's too bad the left is too stupid to understand that they're doing more damage to themselves than to Trump, but, honestly, all I want at this juncture is for Trump to get re-elected so I can see how long the left can self-destruct before they finally realize what they're doing to their party. No this is awesome, they have no grasp of reality, They still don't understand why Trump is POTUS, they blame everyone and everything but themselves. Hillary called most of Americans deplorables, and lost. So now the new candidates double down and tell us how we were misogynist, racist, homophobes that can't be trusted to think for ourselves.
Deranged Rhino Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 25 minutes ago, row_33 said: i'm reading the whistleblower worked for Joe Biden that can't be, that would be a severe conflict of interest.... He did. And he was picked by Brennan and McMaster both personally. And he worked with Steele on Trump/Russia. It's dirty from the ground up. That's why the dems are pushing so hard to keep his name hidden. Their whole foundation comes undone when his name goes public, because he's a partisan. Not a patriot. 2
Warren Zevon Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 7 minutes ago, Gary M said: Hillary called most of Americans deplorables No she didn't. Why do you yearn to be a victim?
Warren Zevon Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 Publicly naming any whistleblower puts his safety and his family's safety in jeopardy. Not a good look but you do you READ THE TRANSCRIPT
Deranged Rhino Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 ***** off with that nonsense. He's a CIA officer, with a ax to grind, working with enemies of this country to subvert it. He gets no protection from me, nor does he deserve any. A real man would stand by his words, take his lumps, and fight for what he believes.
Warren Zevon Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: A real man would stand by his words Indeed - you said you stopped reading my posts. Man up and block me nutjob
Deranged Rhino Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 Beside the fact that going public is his best defense in terms of personal security. Ask Snowden. Anyone saying exposing his name is putting him in danger is wrong, or intentionally lying because of the fear they have of losing this story. Which says all you need to know about them. So once again, GarBear is proving he doesn't know his dick from his elbow while he pushes the line for enemies of this country. ********************* 1 1
Warren Zevon Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Beside the fact that going public is his best defense in terms of personal security. Ask Snowden. Anyone saying exposing his name is putting him in danger is wrong, or intentionally lying because of the fear they have of losing this story. Which says all you need to know about them. So once again, GarBear is proving he doesn't know his dick from his elbow while he pushes the line for enemies of this country. Instead of blocking me you decide to speculate about my dick? You are insane. Get off Twitter and get some help.
Deranged Rhino Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 Not even a funny troll anymore. Gar's lost whatever he once had. Because he's thrown in with enemies of this country for laughs. Sad people gonna do sad things. ********************* 1
Recommended Posts