Whistleblower Has Been Backed Up By Multiple Witnesses

[3rdnlng]

Conducting foreign policy.

[Warren Zevon]

 

 

 

lol

Edited November 5, 2019 by Gary Busey

[Tiberius]

BREAKING: In excerpts of Gordon Sondland’s deposition, the ambassador to the European Union revised his earlier testimony. He said he acknowledged telling one of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s advisers in Warsaw that “resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry-live-updates/2019/11/05/a27d7c48-ff4e-11e9-8bab-0fc209e065a8_story.html

[Koko78]

1 hour ago, Doc said:

He didn’t. Ask Zelensky. 

 

Who the hell needs to talk to the purported victim, when there's a PURPLE HEART RECIPIENT* available to express his unfounded and unsupported concerns?!?

 

 

 

*Of course, the purple heart recipient must have the correct opinion for his military decorations to count.

Edited November 5, 2019 by Koko78

[Tiberius]

6 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Who the hell needs to talk to the purported victim, when there's a PURPLE HEART RECIPIENT* available to express his unfounded and unsupported concerns?!?

 

 

 

*Of course, the purple heart recipient must have the correct opinion for his military decorations to count.

Who spoke under oath? 

[Warren Zevon]

Just now, Tiberius said:

Who spoke under oath? 

 

The mental gymnastics of Trump toadies like Koko is Olympic level stuff 

[Koko78]

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Who spoke under oath? 

 

Multiple people, most of whom exonerated Trump.

[Tiberius]

2 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Multiple people, most of whom exonerated Trump.

There is no exculpatory evidence or Mark Meddows and the other Nazis would be screaming all about. 

[Koko78]

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

There is no exculpatory evidence or Mark Meddows and the other Nazis would be screaming all about. 

 

And yet you can't figure out why the Democrats lost in 2016, could not take the Senate in 2018, and are going to get thumped in 2020.

 

Amazing.

[Warren Zevon]

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

There is no exculpatory evidence or Mark Meddows and the other Nazis would be screaming all about. 

 

Don't worry - DR will posts some tweets any moment now and you'll get attacked personally (it's all they can do when the facts are against them)

 

Why conspire to lie?

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

ROGER SIMON: The Cowardly Whistleblower and ‘Anonymous’ Must Go Public.

 

 

 

 

.

[Chef Jim]

5 hours ago, Teddy KGB said:

 

I really don’t understand how everyone doesn’t have him blocked by now 

 

Because he's the only one here that can make me look smart.  LOL

[row_33]

was Little Bo Peep listed 4 times on the witness list backing up the whisteblower?

 

[SoCal Deek]

Other than agreeing with the whistleblowers opinion of the phone call, has any witness offered any new evidence of this ‘plot’? Have any texts between staff lovers been released? Oh wait...that was the last plot. They’re all starting to look alike.?

[Koko78]

9 minutes ago, row_33 said:

was Little Bo Peep listed 4 times on the witness list backing up the whisteblower?

 

 

She was, but then she lost her sheep.

[IDBillzFan]

1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

Other than agreeing with the whistleblowers opinion of the phone call, has any witness offered any new evidence of this ‘plot’? Have any texts between staff lovers been released? Oh wait...that was the last plot. They’re all starting to look alike.?

 

From what I can tell, the left keeps trying to release 'new' information that really isn't new and it really isn't even helpful, but it provides an incoherent unsubstantiated possibility of an updated report from a previous testimony to a new event that no one can corroborate.

 

I want to suggest it's too bad the left is too stupid to understand that they're doing more damage to themselves than to Trump, but, honestly, all I want at this juncture is for Trump to get re-elected so I can see how long the left can self-destruct before they finally realize what they're doing to their party.

 

 

[SoCal Deek]

1 minute ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

From what I can tell, the left keeps trying to release 'new' information that really isn't new and it really isn't even helpful, but it provides an incoherent unsubstantiated possibility of an updated report from a previous testimony to a new event that no one can corroborate.

 

I want to suggest it's too bad the left is too stupid to understand that they're doing more damage to themselves than to Trump, but, honestly, all I want at this juncture is for Trump to get re-elected so I can see how long the left can self-destruct before they finally realize what they're doing to their party.

 

 

Thanks, that’s what I thought. It’s gonna be an awfully short trial if the defense just needs to ask each witness if the have anything new to offer and they’re all forced to admit....’no, not really’. This has the Mueller fiasco written all over it!

[Warren Zevon]

Just now, SoCal Deek said:

if the defense just needs to ask each witness if the have anything new to offer 

 

The trial has yet to start and one of the witnesses amended his testimony to save his own ass and blame the administration but nothing to see here ***** THE LIBZ

[row_33]

7 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Thanks, that’s what I thought. It’s gonna be an awfully short trial if the defense just needs to ask each witness if the have anything new to offer and they’re all forced to admit....’no, not really’. This has the Mueller fiasco written all over it!

 

nah, lawyers will never tire of something to say or futz around

 

for one trial they insisted on going through the details on 15,000 cheques until it was stopped after 3 solid weeks

 

"is this a cheque"  yes

"from a bank"  yes

"is the account there, and if so can you read it"  yes, 325-83589 (up to 15,000 times if it was required, all the same account)

 

 

Edited November 5, 2019 by row_33

[Tiberius]

2 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Conducting foreign policy, corruptly 

Yup