Chef Jim Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: We don't really care how you go away. Just go. Interesting how simple punctuation changes the meaning of a sentence.
Tiberius Posted October 10, 2019 Author Posted October 10, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: I smell like poo Well...The Kurds were not at Normandy
Foxx Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: i am poo ... you smell too.
Tiberius Posted October 10, 2019 Author Posted October 10, 2019 54 minutes ago, Foxx said: you smell too. Just glad I’m not in Rudy’s situation. Wow, what a crook
Koko78 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 7 hours ago, B-Man said: Whistleblower lawyer acknowledges client had 'contact' with presidential candidates Fox News, by Gregg Re Original Article Mark Zaid and Andrew Bakaj, the attorneys representing the whistleblower at the center of Democrats' impeachment inquiry, acknowledged in a statement on Wednesday that their client "has come into contact with presidential candidates from both parties" -- but insisted that the contact involved the politicians' roles as "elected officials – not as candidates." The lawyers' abrupt disclosure came shortly after The Washington Examiner reported that Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson told lawmakers the whistleblower worked “or had some type of professional relationship” with one of the Democratic presidential candidates, citing three sources familiar with Atkinson’s interview with lawmakers on Friday. (It's nice posting Fox articles this morning, knowing that the board's left has declared them "honest" now.....? ) Whew, thank God we cleared that distinction up. Of course Biden was acting as a potential future presidential candidate, rather than an elected official, when he committed acts of corruption to financially benefit his son, so therefore Trump should be impeached.
DC Tom Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: Well...The Kurds were not at Normandy No, they weren't. They fought against the Allies. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 A few people here called it. THIS TIME WE REALLY REALLY GOT HIM! 3 1 2
RochesterRob Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: A few people here called it. THIS TIME WE REALLY REALLY GOT HIM! Beep. Beep. 2 1
Foxx Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 https://twitter.com/JanJekielek/status/1182438234795716609 2
GG Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 6 hours ago, DC Tom said: We don't really care how you go away. Just go. He won't go away until the idiots here start ignoring him. 2
DC Tom Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 51 minutes ago, Hedge said: Ciaramella left the NSC in 2017 (due to alt-right death threats.) Let me repeat and rephrase that: Eric Ciaramella, the former NSC Advisor on the Ukraine, was two years' gone from the NSC when the reported call took place. 5 1
B-Man Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 Joe Biden worked with whistleblower when he was vice president, officials reveal You may recall — and if not, I’m sure as hell gonna remind you — that just yesterday I wrote, in Who Does the Whistleblower Know?: I think the most plausible inference is that the whistleblowers are connected to Biden’s campaign, or to the DNC, and were shaken by the possibility of Biden and Crowdstrike being investigated because they know there is something there to be found. I wonder what we’ll learn as the “modified limited hangout” continues...................by Charlie Martin 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Ciaramella left the NSC in 2017 (due to alt-right death threats.) Let me repeat and rephrase that: Eric Ciaramella, the former NSC Advisor on the Ukraine, was two years' gone from the NSC when the reported call took place. This is much more interesting now... https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/03/01/trump-national-security-council-225442 (without saying too much: Flynn / McMaster >> ECW >> Ciamramella) 3
3rdnlng Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: This is much more interesting now... https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/03/01/trump-national-security-council-225442 (without saying too much: Flynn / McMaster >> ECW >> Ciamramella) It's something of a long political article but once a person reads between the lines it gets lengthier. 1
Doc Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 No wonder they a) changed the whistleblower rules to allow hearsay and b) are (or at least were) desperately trying to keep his identity hidden. 2
B-Man Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 If Accurate, The Impeachment Game is Over – Fake Whistleblower Lawyers Now Retreat From Testimonial Appearance… Original Article A report from the Wall Street Journal outlines a request by lawyers for the fake CIA ‘whistleblower’ that ultimately spells doom for the entire phony construct of the impeachment construction by anonymous complaint. The Wall Street Journal is reporting the anonymous gossipers’ lawyers are now requesting official impeachment testimony by letters not an in-person appearance. If this is accurate such a request speaks directly to the abject stupidity of the claim: WASHINGTON—Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing instead of appearing in person, according to people familiar with the matter. The request reflects concerns about whether the whistleblower could testify to Democrats and Republicans without revealing his identity, and fears that doing so would lead to it being publicly leaked, jeopardizing his personal safety. The intelligence committees haven’t yet responded to the inquiry about potential written testimony, the people said. Spokeswomen for the House and Senate intelligence committees didn’t respond to requests to comment. (read more) It was already ridiculous to think a presidential impeachment, to remove the most powerful elected political representative of The United States, could continue based on an anonymous complaint. However, expecting the same complainant/accuser to remain invisible during the process is so far beyond nonsensical, the light from where nonsense emanates wouldn’t reach this narrative for a year. Yes, feel free to pummel the left-wing nuts based on the absurdity of this request. Only the most raving Moonbat imaginable would think they could impeach a sitting U.S. President via a ‘Dear Sir’ complaint letter to congress. 4
Recommended Posts