Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 13 minutes ago, njbuff said: See, this is what I don't understand about Congress. Isn't what Schiff is doing against all kinds of ethics in Congress? Someone needs to enlighten me on why Schiff isn't being talked to by somebody with his actions. Because he's being sheltered by other criminals in Congress on BOTH sides of the aisle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Soon you guys will be saying that about Trump ? i like how how you guys can’t wait to get as far away from the losers you back after they leave office. After At least our loser wins elections. Edited October 4, 2019 by Chef Jim 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Soon you guys will be saying that about Trump ? Trump went bankrupt in the casino business. Nothing he does now is going to get much lower than that. Seriously...you TDS sufferers give him far more credit than his supposed "supporters" do. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 Do Trump's sons , daughter and son in law not profit from foreign sources ? The President's properties. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 29 minutes ago, ALF said: Do Trump's sons , daughter and son in law not profit from foreign sources ? The President's properties. ? Don't be stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 43 minutes ago, ALF said: Do Trump's sons , daughter and son in law not profit from foreign sources ? The President's properties. ? Of course they do. How many of those projects started after Trump became POTUS? How many of them are in the energy industry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 17 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Don't be stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 9 minutes ago, ALF said: Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 48 minutes ago, ALF said: Fixed. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 Well, when your first "whistleblower" falls flat, invent another! https://news.yahoo.com/2nd-whistleblower-ukraine-trump-015820491.html 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 5 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Well, when your first "whistleblower" falls flat, invent another! https://news.yahoo.com/2nd-whistleblower-ukraine-trump-015820491.html The NYT story is that someone who is not currently a whistleblower is considering becoming a whistleblower to tell us what we've already been told by the first whistleblower, whom the non-whistleblower has already testified in support of, so he should have no new evidence to provide, unless it's something he withheld from the ICIG. Thank God. For a moment I thought Trump might get away with whatever it is he's accused of being guilty of today. But it sounds like they really have him now... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: The NYT story is that someone who is not currently a whistleblower is considering becoming a whistleblower to tell us what we've already been told by the first whistleblower, whom the non-whistleblower has already testified in support of, so he should have no new evidence to provide, unless it's something he withheld from the ICIG. Thank God. For a moment I thought Trump might get away with whatever it is he's accused of being guilty of today. But it sounds like they really have him now... Ahh, but this one has first-hand knowledge of all the stuff that isn't new, making Trump go from incredibly guilty to super-incredibly guilty of beating Hillary or whatever this week's crime is. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 (edited) List of people Trump named to fulfill his anti corruption "duty" Hunter Biden Joseph Biden List of people named who were running for president Joseph Biden Not politically motivated? Only Trump U graduates would buy that. Edited October 5, 2019 by John Adams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 6 hours ago, Hedge said: Good on Beck for grabbing the Col. Sanders gig. Rudy's stint sure was short. At this point I think everyone has had it except DC Tom. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 3 hours ago, John Adams said: List of people Trump named to fulfill his anti corruption "duty" Hunter Biden Joseph Biden List of people named who were running for president Joseph Biden Not politically motivated? Only Trump U graduates would buy that. List of candidates who may have been a corrupt VP of the US who is now running for President? Sure it has political implications. And there’s a legit, specific, predicate to look into. There can be both. Go find a phone call where Trump asked someone to investigate any other candidate in a blanket inquiry and maybe you might have a point. Go find a phone call where Trump asked for a general (not specific) investigation of Biden and maybe you might have a point. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 10 minutes ago, snafu said: List of candidates who may have been a corrupt VP of the US who is now running for President? Sure it has political implications. And there’s a legit, specific, predicate to look into. There can be both. Go find a phone call where Trump asked someone to investigate any other candidate in a blanket inquiry and maybe you might have a point. Go find a phone call where Trump asked for a general (not specific) investigation of Biden and maybe you might have a point. “By the way, likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine.” Sorry it’s not in a phone call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 11 minutes ago, John Adams said: “By the way, likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine.” Sorry it’s not in a phone call. Bad example. Either way, he’s (A) trying to make your head explode, and more importantly (B) talking about another specific matter in China. That one is probably more egregious. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capco Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, John Adams said: “By the way, likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine.” Sorry it’s not in a phone call. He provided a quid pro quo on national television when he said that he wanted China to investigate political opponents and that his treatment of China in the trade war negotiations would depend on that. Edited October 5, 2019 by Capco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 59 minutes ago, Capco said: He provided a quid pro quo on national television when he said that he wanted China to investigate political opponents and that his treatment of China in the trade war negotiations would depend on that. Do you have a link for that, because that's not what I heard? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts