TakeYouToTasker Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 4:49 PM, Crayola64 said: it’s sad you care so much ? and nice job not answering my question. A bunch of whackos claiming a punishment for the coup plotters will come....but won’t explain who or what that means Expand Rational individuals don’t make time for those who “engage” as you have. Why would anyone take the time to make a detailed explanation to a person whom has already dedicated themselves to wholesale rejection of new information which cuts across his preferred biases? Such a person isn’t worth trying to inform, as they’ve already told you they don’t value the information you can provide. I’ve gone ahead and humored you this once because you directly engaged a post I make in response to another poster; but please understand that you’ve already planted your flag and declared that you’re not worth my time. If you require an education, and decide to seek one in earnest: feel free to ask mea culpa, and I’ll likely honor it. Until such point, you and I are done, as you don’t offer me anything of value. Cheers. 3
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted October 2, 2019 Author Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 4:40 PM, Deranged Rhino said: There's hundreds of pages of people going on the record -- and providing evidence to support it. Expand Really? Hundreds of pages of people? Ya know, that just sounds like it was cooked up in the fake news kitchen. On 10/2/2019 at 4:50 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Expand Your hero! On 10/2/2019 at 4:52 PM, Chef Jim said: That is how polite people with class refer to one another whether they are truly friends or not. And I'm not one bit surprised you don't understand that because you possess neither. And Nancy Pelosi will have a grilled chicken salad with a raspberry vinaigrette, and I'm a Chef. Expand Polite people? Man are you a stupid sh it head!
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 5:00 PM, TakeYouToTasker said: Rational individuals don’t make time for those who “engage” as you have. Why would anyone take the time to make a detailed explanation to a person whom has already dedicated themselves to wholesale rejection of new information which cuts across his preferred biases? Such a person isn’t worth trying to inform, as they’ve already told you they don’t value the information you can provide. I’ve gone ahead and humored you this once because you directly engaged a post I make in response to another poster; but please understand that you’ve already planted your flag and declared that you’re not worth my time. If you require an education, and decide to seek one in earnest: feel free to ask mea culpa, and I’ll likely honor it. Until such point, you and I are done, as you don’t offer me anything of value. Cheers. Expand detailed explanation??? How about some names and “jail.” Whatever you just posted took more effort (I didn’t read it, seemed ramblish)
Chef Jim Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 5:01 PM, Tiberius said: Polite people? Man are you a stupid sh it head! Expand Oh yeah I completely messed that up. What I meant to say was mature people. I rarely call people names here but you, and many like you on the left here, for whatever reason, thrive on it. Why is that? I lived in the Bay area for nearly 9 years and boy is the left an angry lot.
Foxx Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 (edited) On 10/2/2019 at 4:45 PM, Crayola64 said: says someone who posts wayyyyyy more than me lol Expand upps, wrong browser. Edited October 2, 2019 by Foxx 1
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 5:07 PM, Foxx said: upps, wrong browser. Expand yes, people who disagree with your nonsense must actually be one person, because no way 2 people don't believe this nonsense. Great logic 1
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 2:32 PM, Chef Jim said: Refusal to answer a simple yes and no question and then resorting to name calling is not very becoming. Not surprising but unbecoming. Expand When did you stop beating your wife? No one asked the question for information, just to be douchey.
B-Man Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 Ukraine? Impeachment? Trump Can Survive It All, Foreign Analysts Say New York Times, by Steven Erlanger Original Article BRUSSELS — This summer, just after he visited the White House for the second time, President Andrzej Duda of Poland held forth about how much he admired President Trump’s transactional style. “I must tell you that in this respect I find it very easy and good to cooperate with President Donald Trump,” Mr. Duda said in an interview in Warsaw. “Because he’s very down to earth, very concrete. He tells me what he wants, he asks me what he can get from us.” . 1
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 4:51 PM, Rob's House said: Translation: Stop pointing to the evidence that proves I'm a left-wing shill. Expand Translation: I will simply paint people's positions as black or white, and cannot both appreciate some actions by Trump and criticize others. At least DR liked your post. You little lovebirds.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted October 2, 2019 Author Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 4:44 PM, Albwan said: tibs do you get paid by the account or per post Expand You'd know better than anyone, because you are obviously just DRs other log in name. On 10/2/2019 at 5:06 PM, Chef Jim said: Oh yeah I completely messed that up. What I meant to say was mature people. I rarely call people names here but you, and many like you on the left here, for whatever reason, thrive on it. Why is that? I lived in the Bay area for nearly 9 years and boy is the left an angry lot. Expand I just see you as a really dumb person
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 3:23 PM, 3rdnlng said: Did the Crowdstrike server and Joe Biden get mentioned at the same time? Which got mentioned first and in conjunction with "a favor"? If they weren't mentioned at the same time, how much conversation happened between the time they were individually brought up? Expand So the Bidens were just "[an]other thing" following the first/second "favor" and not actually a "favor?" Is this some critical distinction between the "favor" and how he asked for an investigation of the Bidens? What is "is" 3rdnng?
B-Man Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 Third and Long. Ukraine: A Political Rerun by Cal Thomas Original Article Back when reruns were a staple of summer programming, television networks aired repeats of their programs, giving viewers another opportunity to see what they had already seen. Democratic politicians are now conducting their own version of reruns. (Snip) The New York Times reports the whistleblower is a CIA agent who was on loan to the White House. I have known several CIA agents and two directors of the CIA--George H.W. Bush and Porter Goss--and none were known for the kind of prose contained in the complaint. The document appears to have been written by a team of lawyers with a political objective, namely impeachment of the president.
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 5:18 PM, John Adams said: So the Bidens were just "[an]other thing" following the first/second "favor" and not actually a "favor?" Is this some critical distinction between the "favor" and how he asked for an investigation of the Bidens? What is "is" 3rdnng? Expand Dude its impossible to prove these people wrong since they won't ever acknowledge it. Back when I engaged these people more substantively, I proved 3rdnlng as wrong as can be and he would not concede it. It was nonsensical . I get trying, but still.
John Adams Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 5:22 PM, Crayola64 said: Dude its impossible to prove these people wrong since they won't ever acknowledge it. Back when I engaged these people more substantively, I proved 3rdnlng as wrong as can be and he would not concede it. It was nonsensical . I get trying, but still. Expand I've been here a day or two. I know the morans.
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 (edited) On 10/2/2019 at 5:25 PM, John Adams said: I've been here a day or two. I know the morans. Expand Some once in awhile will admit when they are wrong, but he is an especially bad one. I'm sure you do know, its pretty obvious. He also isn't as smart as some of the others so he cant follow some things which is frustrating. Edited October 2, 2019 by Crayola64
Westside Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 5:26 PM, Crayola64 said: Some once in awhile will admit when they are wrong, he is an especially bad one. I'm sure you do know, its pretty obvious. He also isn't as smart as some of the others so he cant follow some things which is frustrating. Expand Isn't that cute! You're having a conversation with yourself!
3rdnlng Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 5:22 PM, Crayola64 said: Dude its impossible to prove these people wrong since they won't ever acknowledge it. Back when I engaged these people more substantively, I proved 3rdnlng as wrong as can be and he would not concede it. It was nonsensical . I get trying, but still. Expand Makingshit up, eh? You couldn't prove me wrong in court even if you had DNA evidence. a video and my confession. BTW, does the 3rd chair even get a microphone? 1
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 5:29 PM, westside2 said: Isn't that cute! You're having a conversation with yourself! Expand lol oh yea! On 10/2/2019 at 5:29 PM, 3rdnlng said: Makingshit up, eh? You couldn't prove me wrong in court even if you had DNA evidence. a video and my confession. BTW, does the 3rd chair even get a microphone? Expand No, it was one of the main reasons I stopped engaging with substance with you all. I realized you all arent reasonable, but are a bunch of weird conspiracy losers.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 Offers nothing. Refuses to read. Demands a list of names (despite those names being available in the material he refuses to read). Then blames others for his failure to read. Why? Because Crayola isn't an honest person. He's not a serious person. He's an asshat. And a spectacular one at that
Numark3 Posted October 2, 2019 Posted October 2, 2019 On 10/2/2019 at 5:32 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Offers nothing. Refuses to read. Demands a list of names (despite those names being available in the material he refuses to read). Then blames others for his failure to read. Why? Because Crayola isn't an honest person. He's not a serious person. He's an asshat. And a spectacular one at that Expand Teach me to be a SERIOUS PERSON!!!! You sound like a child
Recommended Posts